| Literature DB >> 33379160 |
Lydia Riepler1, Annika Rössler1, Albert Falch1, André Volland1, Wegene Borena1, Dorothee von Laer1, Janine Kimpel1.
Abstract
Neutralizing antibodies are a major correlate of protection for many viruses including the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Thus, vaccine candidates should potently induce neutralizing antibodies to render effective protection from infection. A variety of in vitro assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies has been described. However, validation of the different assays against each other is important to allow comparison of different studies. Here, we compared four different SARS-CoV-2 neutralization assays using the same set of patient samples. Two assays used replication competent SARS-CoV-2, a focus forming assay and a TCID50-based assay, while the other two assays used replication defective lentiviral or vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV)-based particles pseudotyped with SARS-CoV-2 spike. All assays were robust and produced highly reproducible neutralization titers. Titers of neutralizing antibodies correlated well between the different assays and with the titers of SARS-CoV-2 S-protein binding antibodies detected in an ELISA. Our study showed that commonly used SARS-CoV-2 neutralization assays are robust and that results obtained with different assays are comparable.Entities:
Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; neutralization assay; neutralizing antibodies; pseudotype virus
Year: 2020 PMID: 33379160 PMCID: PMC7824240 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9010013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vaccines (Basel) ISSN: 2076-393X