Literature DB >> 34612011

Prognostic impact of chronological age on efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer: Real-world data from 86 173 patients.

Shinkichi Takamori1, Mototsugu Shimokawa2,3, Takefumi Komiya4.   

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become standard pharmacological therapies in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because elderly patients with NSCLC are often excluded from clinical trials as a result of lower functional capacity or comorbidities, the prognostic impact of chronological age on the efficacy of ICIs is unclear. The National Cancer Database was queried for stage IV NSCLC patients between 2014 and 2015. Associations between ICI therapy and clinical characteristics were assessed using chi-squared tests. Kaplan-Meier curves were compared using the log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify clinical characteristics predictive of overall survival (OS). This study included 24 136 patients with stage IV NSCLC aged ≥75 years and 62 037 patients with stage IV NSCLC aged <75 years. Patients aged ≥75 years treated with ICIs had significantly longer OS than those not treated with ICIs (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-0.64, p < 0.0001). The corresponding HR in patients aged <75 years was 0.67 (95% CI 0.65-0.68, p < 0.0001). Cox modeling confirmed the survival benefit of ICI therapy in patients aged ≥75 years (HR for patients not receiving ICIs 1.63 [95% CI: 1.55-1.71], p < 0.0001). The corresponding HR in patients aged <75 years was 1.47 (95% CI 1.43-1.51, p < 0.0001). Chronological age does not appear to negatively impact the survival benefit of ICI therapy in patients with stage IV NSCLC according to this large real-world database analysis.
© 2021 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  age; immune checkpoint inhibitor; non-small-cell lung cancer; programmed cell death-1; survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34612011      PMCID: PMC8563149          DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.14178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorac Cancer        ISSN: 1759-7706            Impact factor:   3.500


INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer has one of the highest case‐fatality rates of all malignancies, and non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 85% of lung cancers. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death‐1 (PD‐1) or programmed cell death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) have been widely adopted for therapy of NSCLC. , , , , , Because of the small number of elderly patients with NSCLC included in the clinical trials of these drugs, the efficacy of ICIs among elderly patients with NSCLC remains unclear. , The age‐dependent loss of immune function is called immune senescence and is associated with decreased immune surveillance functions of both innate and adaptive immunity. Aging is associated with decreased antigen presentation by dendric cells, decreased numbers of naïve CD8+ T cells, and reduced chemotaxis by neutrophils and macrophages. , Given the potential for immune senescence, the efficacy of ICIs in elderly patients remains controversial. The aim of the current study was to clarify whether chronological age was a significant prognostic factor in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs using real‐world data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

METHODS

NCDB

The NCDB is a joint project between the Commission on Cancer (CoC) of the American College of Surgeons and the American Cancer Society. The CoC NCDB and the participating hospitals were the sources of the de‐identified data used herein. These organizations have not verified the data and are not responsible for the statistical validity of the data analysis nor the conclusions derived by the authors.

Statistical analyses

Clinical characteristics were summarized using contingency tables. The associations between ICI (yes vs. no) and clinical demographics were compared using the chi‐squared test. Survival curves were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared between the two groups using the log‐rank test. The hazard ratios (HR) for survival between groups with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify the independent prognostic factor. All Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed using JMP 14.0 (SAS Institute Inc.). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics

A total of 86 173 patients with stage IV NSCLC were selected for the analysis. Among patients aged <75 years, 8968 of 62 037 (14.5%) received ICIs, whereas 2241 of 24 136 (9.3%) patients aged ≥75 years received ICIs. The relationships between administration of ICIs and clinical factors, stratified by chronological age (≥75 vs. <75 years), are shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1

Clinical characteristics of patients with stage IV non‐small‐cell lung cancer aged <75 and ≥75 years (n = 86 173)

Factors<75 years old (n = 62 037)≥75 years old (n = 24 136)
Immune checkpoint inhibitor p valueImmune checkpoint inhibitor p value
Yes (n = 8968)No (n = 53 069)Yes (n = 2241)No (n = 21 895)
Sex
Male4645 (14%)28 309 (86%)0.00671222 (10%)11 211 (90%)0.0027
Female4323 (15%)24 760 (85%)1019 (9%)10 684 (91%)
Race
Whites7424 (15%)42 528 (85%)<0.00011973 (9%)18 910 (91%)0.0272
Others1544 (13%)10 541 (87%)268 (8%)2985 (92%)
Institution
Others5916 (15%)34 715 (85%)0.31311560 (9%)15 535 (91%)0.1877
Academic3052 (14%)18 354 (86%)681 (10%)6360 (90%)
Charlson–Deyo score
≥2909 (12%)6791 (88%)<0.0001342 (8%)3753 (92%)0.0247
≤18059 (15%)46 278 (85%)1899 (9%)18 142 (91%)
Year of diagnosis
20143754 (12%)27 238 (88%)<0.0001786 (7%)11 155 (93%)<0.0001
20155214 (17%)25 831 (83%)1455 (12%)10 740 (88%)
Histology
Others2430 (10%)21 293 (90%)<0.0001694 (7%)12 826 (93%)<0.0001
Adenocarcinoma NOS6538 (17%)31 776 (83%)1547 (12%)9069 (88%)
Nodal status
N02211 (13%)15 375 (87%)<0.0001719 (8%)8308 (92%)<0.0001
≥N16757 (15%)37 694 (85%)1522 (10%)13 587 (90%)
Brain metastasis
Yes709 (9%)7295 (91%)<0.000189 (5%)1682 (95%)<0.0001
No8259 (15%)45 774 (85%)2152 (10%)20 213 (90%)
Bone metastasis
Yes1403 (14%)8520 (86%)0.3343303 (8%)3337 (92%)0.0301
No7565 (15%)44 549 (85%)1938 (9%)18 558 (91%)
Liver metastasis
Yes464 (11%)3692 (89%)<0.000197 (6%)1448 (94%)<0.0001
No8504 (15%)49 377 (85%)2144 (9%)20 447 (91%)
Surgery for primary lesion
Yes225 (11%)1773 (89%)<0.000138 (8%)418 (92%)0.5155
No8743 (15%)51 296 (85%)2203 (9%)21 477 (91%)
Radiation
Yes4479 (14%)28 430 (86%)<0.0001865 (9%)8314 (91%)0.5680
No4489 (15%)24 639 (85%)1376 (9%)13 581 (91%)
Chemotherapy
Yes7398 (17%)34 928 (83%)<0.00011444 (13%)9752 (87%)<0.0001
No1570 (8%)18 141 (92%)797 (6%)12 143 (94%)

Abbreviation: NOS, not otherwise specified.

Clinical characteristics of patients with stage IV non‐small‐cell lung cancer aged <75 and ≥75 years (n = 86 173) Abbreviation: NOS, not otherwise specified.

Univariate survival analyses of patients with stage IV NSCLC treated with or without ICIs stratified by chronological age

Kaplan–Meier curves of OS among patients with stage IV NSCLC stratified by chronological age are shown in Figure 1. Among patients aged <75 years, those who received ICIs had significantly longer OS than those who did not receive ICIs (median OS 14.5 vs. 7.8 months, HR 0.67 [95% CI 0.65–0.68], p < 0.0001; Figure 1(a)). Similarly, among patients aged ≥75 years, those who received ICIs had significantly longer OS than the those who did not receive ICIs (median OS 11.9 vs. 5.4 months, HR 0.61 [95% CI 0.58–0.64], p < 0.000; Figure 1(b)).
FIGURE 1

Kaplan–Meier curves of overall survival (OS) among patients with stage IV non‐small‐cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) stratified by chronological age. (a) Among patients aged <75 years, those receiving ICIs had significantly longer OS than those who did not receive ICIs. (b) Among patients aged ≥75 years, those receiving ICIs had significantly longer OS those who did not receive ICIs. Hr, hazard ratio; mOS, median overall survival

Kaplan–Meier curves of overall survival (OS) among patients with stage IV non‐small‐cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) stratified by chronological age. (a) Among patients aged <75 years, those receiving ICIs had significantly longer OS than those who did not receive ICIs. (b) Among patients aged ≥75 years, those receiving ICIs had significantly longer OS those who did not receive ICIs. Hr, hazard ratio; mOS, median overall survival

Univariate and multivariate analyses of OS among patients with stage IV NSCLC aged <75 and ≥75 years

The results of univariate and multivariate analyses of OS among patients with stage IV NSCLC aged <75 and ≥75 years are shown in Table 2. Multivariate analysis of OS among patients aged <75 years demonstrated that male sex, white race, uninsured status, nonacademic institution, Charlson‐Deyo score ≥ 2, diagnosis in 2014, nonadenocarcinoma not otherwise specified [NOS] histology, nodal status ≥ N1, bone metastasis, liver metastasis, no surgery of the primary lesion, radiation, chemotherapy, and no ICI therapy were independent predictors of shorter OS (HR for patients not receiving ICIs 1.47 [95% CI 1.43–1.51], p < 0.0001; Table 2). Among patients aged ≥75 years, multivariate analysis of OS showed that male sex, white race, nonacademic institution, Charlson‐Deyo score ≥ 2, diagnosis in 2014, nonadenocarcinoma NOS histology, nodal status ≥ N1, brain metastasis, bone metastasis, liver metastasis, no surgery of the primary lesion, chemotherapy, and no ICI therapy were independent predictors of shorter OS (HR for patients not receiving ICIs 1.63 [95% CI 1.55–1.71], p < 0.0001; Table 2). In multivariate analyses, both no chemotherapy and no ICI therapy were independent predictors of shorter OS in patients with stage IV NSCLC aged <75 and ≥75 years. In each group, the HR for patients not receiving chemotherapy was greater than that for patients not receiving ICI.
TABLE 2

Multivariate analyses of overall survival in patients with stage IV non‐small‐cell lung cancer aged <75 and ≥75 years

Factors<75 years old (n = 62 037)≥75 years old (n = 24 136)
UnivariateMultivariableUnivariateMultivariable
HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)
p value p value p value p value
Sex
Male1.27 (1.24–1.29)1.22 (1.20–1.24)1.17 (1.14–1.21)1.19 (1.16–1.23)
Female<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
Race
Whites1.13 (1.11–1.16)1.14 (1.11–1.17)1.16 (1.11–1.21)1.16 (1.11–1.21)
Others<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
Insurance status
Uninsured1.12 (1.07–1.18)1.06 (1.01–1.12)1.01 (0.80–1.25)1.16 (0.94–1.46)
Insured<0.00010.01180.93070.1906
Institution
Others1.20 (1.17–1.22)1.19 (1.16–1.21)1.18 (1.14–1.21)1.14 (1.11–1.18)
Academic<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
Charlson–Deyo score
≥21.37 (1.33–1.40)1.26 (1.23–1.30)1.33 (1.28–1.38)1.22 (1.18–1.27)
≤1<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
Year of diagnosis
20141.05 (1.03–1.07)1.05 (1.02–1.07)1.04 (1.01–1.07)0.91 (0.88–0.94)
2015<0.0001<0.00010.0088<0.0001
Histology
Others1.23 (1.21–1.25)1.13 (1.11–1.15)1.14 (1.11–1.17)1.05 (1.02–1.08)
Adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified<0.0001<0.0001<0.00010.0014
Nodal status
≥N11.22 (1.19–1.24)1.33 (1.30–1.36)1.17 (1.14–1.21)1.31 (1.27–1.35)
N0<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
Brain metastasis
Yes1.09 (1.06–1.12)1.02 (0.99–1.05)1.24 (1.18–1.31)1.25 (1.18–1.32)
No<0.00010.2439<0.0001<0.0001
Bone metastasis
Yes1.24 (1.21–1.27)1.13 (1.11–1.15)1.17 (1.13–1.22)1.20 (1.15–1.25)
No<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
Liver metastasis
Yes1.45 (1.40–1.50)1.32 (1.27–1.36)1.32 (1.25–1.39)1.26 (1.19–1.33)
No<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
Surgery for primary lesion
No2.02 (1.90–2.14)2.04 (1.92–2.16)1.85 (1.66–2.08)1.83 (1.64–2.06)
Yes<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
Radiation
Yes1.10 (1.08–1.12)1.12 (1.10–1.14)1.06 (1.03–1.09)1.00 (0.98–1.04)
No<0.0001<0.0001<0.00010.7468
Chemotherapy
No2.19 (2.15–2.23)2.30 (2.25–2.34)2.11 (2.05–2.17)2.18 (2.12–2.24)
Yes<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
Immune checkpoint inhibitor
No1.50 (1.46–1.54)1.47 (1.43–1.51)1.65 (1.57–1.73)1.63 (1.55–1.71)
Yes<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; NOS, not otherwise specified.

Multivariate analyses of overall survival in patients with stage IV non‐small‐cell lung cancer aged <75 and ≥75 years Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; NOS, not otherwise specified.

DISCUSSION

The efficacy of ICIs among elderly patients is controversial given the potential for immune senescence. Aging may reduce the potency of the effector phase of the cancer immunity cycle because of decreased antigen presentation by dendritic cells and decreased numbers of naïve CD8+ T cells. , However, patients with melanoma aged ≥60 years old receiving ICIs responded more efficiently to anti‐PD‐1 inhibitors than younger patients. One potential explanation of this phenomenon is that in younger patients, regulatory T cells are more abundant in the tumor microenvironment and negatively impact the efficacy of ICIs. In addition, frequencies of CD8+ T cells, which play significant roles in the cancer immunity cycle, were decreased in melanoma tumors from younger patients. Thus, despite immune senescence, elderly patients with cancer can still potentially benefit from ICI therapy. An Italian multicenter retrospective study investigated the efficacy and safety of anti‐PD‐1 immunotherapy among patients with advanced NSCLC aged ≥75 years and found that the efficacy and toxicity of ICIs in elderly patients were comparable with the profiles observed in younger patients. A meta‐analysis showed that ICI therapy and non‐ICI therapy of NSCLC had comparable efficacy in patients aged ≥65 years and those aged <65 years. Another meta‐analysis of a large clinical dataset suggested that NSCLC patients aged ≥65 years can benefit even more from ICI therapy than younger patients. In the current study, we found that the HR for death among patients with stage IV NSCLC aged ≥75 years who did not receive ICIs was greater than among those aged <75 years (1.63 vs. 1.48). A survival benefit of ICI therapy was observed in both age strata. Consistently, the HR for death among patients with stage IV NSCLC aged ≥75 years who received ICIs was smaller than that among those who did not receive ICIs (1.23 vs. 1.32). These results suggest that aging does not negatively impact ICI efficacy in patients with stage IV NSCLC, in line with these previous reports. , , , , , In multivariate analyses, the HRs for patients not receiving chemotherapy were greater than those for patients not receiving ICI in patients with stage IV NSCLC aged <75 and ≥75 years. One of the explanations of this phenomenon is that cytotoxic chemotherapy is generally not suitable for frail patients and/or those with poor performance status due to their increased incidence of adverse events, but ICI may be a potential treatment option for such population. Therefore, patients receiving ICI may have included more frail patients compared with those treated with chemotherapy. Such bias arising from patients' selection may potentially result in the greater HR for patients not receiving chemotherapy. In addition, NCDB lacks data about names of medications, dose, and number of cycles, so detailed subset analysis cannot be conducted. These points make it difficult to compare the HRs of patients who received chemotherapy and those with ICI. Further advanced analysis is needed to determine the clinical impact of chemotherapy and that of ICI. Our study had several limitations. First, the NCDB lacks several prognostic factors, including performance status, PD‐L1 expression level, genetic mutation status, laboratory data, line of therapy, and immune‐related adverse events. Analyses including these factors may further elucidate correlates of the safety and efficacy of ICIs in elderly NSCLC patients. Second, this was a retrospective study and potential biases associated with physician decisions and/or patient status cannot be ruled out. Our findings should be validated in future well‐designed prospective studies. In conclusion, the present study showed that chronological age does not appear to impact the survival benefit of ICIs in patients with stage IV NSCLC. These findings should be validated in future prospective studies.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Takefumi Komiya received travel fees from Merck. All authors declare no conflicts of interest associated with this study.
  19 in total

1.  First-Line Nivolumab in Stage IV or Recurrent Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  David P Carbone; Martin Reck; Luis Paz-Ares; Benjamin Creelan; Leora Horn; Martin Steins; Enriqueta Felip; Michel M van den Heuvel; Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu; Firas Badin; Neal Ready; T Jeroen N Hiltermann; Suresh Nair; Rosalyn Juergens; Solange Peters; Elisa Minenza; John M Wrangle; Delvys Rodriguez-Abreu; Hossein Borghaei; George R Blumenschein; Liza C Villaruz; Libor Havel; Jana Krejci; Jesus Corral Jaime; Han Chang; William J Geese; Prabhu Bhagavatheeswaran; Allen C Chen; Mark A Socinski
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Leena Gandhi; Delvys Rodríguez-Abreu; Shirish Gadgeel; Emilio Esteban; Enriqueta Felip; Flávia De Angelis; Manuel Domine; Philip Clingan; Maximilian J Hochmair; Steven F Powell; Susanna Y-S Cheng; Helge G Bischoff; Nir Peled; Francesco Grossi; Ross R Jennens; Martin Reck; Rina Hui; Edward B Garon; Michael Boyer; Belén Rubio-Viqueira; Silvia Novello; Takayasu Kurata; Jhanelle E Gray; John Vida; Ziwen Wei; Jing Yang; Harry Raftopoulos; M Catherine Pietanza; Marina C Garassino
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy in elderly patients with PD-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Pooled analysis from the KEYNOTE-010, KEYNOTE-024, and KEYNOTE-042 studies.

Authors:  Kaname Nosaki; Hideo Saka; Yukio Hosomi; Paul Baas; Gilberto de Castro; Martin Reck; Yi-Long Wu; Julie R Brahmer; Enriqueta Felip; Takeshi Sawada; Kazuo Noguchi; Shi Rong Han; Bilal Piperdi; Debra A Kush; Gilberto Lopes
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 4.  Non-small cell lung cancer: current treatment and future advances.

Authors:  Cecilia Zappa; Shaker A Mousa
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2016-06

5.  Correlation between patients' age and cancer immunotherapy efficacy.

Authors:  Qiong Wu; Qiuhong Wang; Xin Tang; Ran Xu; Luzhong Zhang; Xinming Chen; Qun Xue; Ziheng Wang; Rongfeng Shi; Feiran Wang; Fei Ju; Bo Zhang; You Lang Zhou
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2019-02-03       Impact factor: 8.110

6.  Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy for Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Luis Paz-Ares; Alexander Luft; David Vicente; Ali Tafreshi; Mahmut Gümüş; Julien Mazières; Barbara Hermes; Filiz Çay Şenler; Tibor Csőszi; Andrea Fülöp; Jerónimo Rodríguez-Cid; Jonathan Wilson; Shunichi Sugawara; Terufumi Kato; Ki Hyeong Lee; Ying Cheng; Silvia Novello; Balazs Halmos; Xiaodong Li; Gregory M Lubiniecki; Bilal Piperdi; Dariusz M Kowalski
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Age Correlates with Response to Anti-PD1, Reflecting Age-Related Differences in Intratumoral Effector and Regulatory T-Cell Populations.

Authors:  Curtis H Kugel; Stephen M Douglass; Marie R Webster; Amanpreet Kaur; Qin Liu; Xiangfan Yin; Sarah A Weiss; Farbod Darvishian; Rami N Al-Rohil; Abibatou Ndoye; Reeti Behera; Gretchen M Alicea; Brett L Ecker; Mitchell Fane; Michael J Allegrezza; Nikolaos Svoronos; Vinit Kumar; Daniel Y Wang; Rajasekharan Somasundaram; Siwen Hu-Lieskovan; Alpaslan Ozgun; Meenhard Herlyn; Jose R Conejo-Garcia; Dmitry Gabrilovich; Erica L Stone; Theodore S Nowicki; Jeffrey Sosman; Rajat Rai; Matteo S Carlino; Georgina V Long; Richard Marais; Antoni Ribas; Zeynep Eroglu; Michael A Davies; Bastian Schilling; Dirk Schadendorf; Wei Xu; Ravi K Amaravadi; Alexander M Menzies; Jennifer L McQuade; Douglas B Johnson; Iman Osman; Ashani T Weeraratna
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for previously untreated, PD-L1-expressing, locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-042): a randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Tony S K Mok; Yi-Long Wu; Iveta Kudaba; Dariusz M Kowalski; Byoung Chul Cho; Hande Z Turna; Gilberto Castro; Vichien Srimuninnimit; Konstantin K Laktionov; Igor Bondarenko; Kaoru Kubota; Gregory M Lubiniecki; Jin Zhang; Debra Kush; Gilberto Lopes
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Atezolizumab in combination with carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (IMpower130): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Howard West; Michael McCleod; Maen Hussein; Alessandro Morabito; Achim Rittmeyer; Henry J Conter; Hans-Georg Kopp; Davey Daniel; Steven McCune; Tarek Mekhail; Alona Zer; Niels Reinmuth; Ahad Sadiq; Alan Sandler; Wei Lin; Tania Ochi Lohmann; Venice Archer; Lijia Wang; Marcin Kowanetz; Federico Cappuzzo
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 41.316

View more
  4 in total

1.  [Consensus of Chinese Experts on Medical Treatment of Advanced Lung Cancer 
in the Elderly (2022 Edition)].

Authors: 
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2022-06-20

2.  Efficacy of Atezolizumab for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Based on Clinical and Molecular Features: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wenjie Liu; Gengwei Huo; Peng Chen
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 8.786

3.  Inhibitors of PD-1 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Molecular Features.

Authors:  Gengwei Huo; Wenjie Liu; Peng Chen
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 8.786

4.  Prognostic impact of chronological age on efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer: Real-world data from 86 173 patients.

Authors:  Shinkichi Takamori; Mototsugu Shimokawa; Takefumi Komiya
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 3.500

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.