| Literature DB >> 34611516 |
Chengyuan Yang1, Cheng Gao2, Naicheng Liu1, Yitong Zhu3, Xu Zhu1, Xinlin Su1, Qin Zhang1, Yanglin Wu1, Chenhui Zhang1, Ang Liu1, Weifeng Lin4, Luyang Tao2, Huilin Yang1, Jun Lin1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) combined with long bone fracture, the fracture healing is always faster than that of patients with single fracture, which is characterized by more callus growth at the fracture site and even ectopic ossification. Exosomes are nanoscale membrane vesicles secreted by cells, which contain cell-specific proteins, miRNAs, and mRNAs.Entities:
Keywords: Bone healing; Exosomes; Liposomes; Osteoblasts; Traumatic brain injury; miRNAs
Year: 2021 PMID: 34611516 PMCID: PMC8476897 DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2021.09.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Translat ISSN: 2214-031X Impact factor: 5.191
Primer sequences used for the validation amongst upregulated genes.
| Name | Direction | 5’→3′ |
|---|---|---|
| COL1A1 | Forward | GCTCCTCTTAGGGGCCACT |
| Reverse | ATTGGGGACCCTTAGGCCAT | |
| RUNX2 | Forward | GACTGTGGTTACCGTCATGGC |
| Reverse | ACTTGGTTTTTCATAACAGCGGA | |
| GAPDH | Forward | AATGGATTTGGACGCATTGGT |
| Reverse | TTTGCACTGGTACGTGTTGAT |
Figure 1Representative X-ray (A) and Micro-CT (B) images of mice in TF and SF groups at 3 and 5 weeks after modeling (C–F) Quantitative analysis of fracture healing parameters (BV, TV, BV/TV, and Tb.N) of mice in TF and SF groups at 3 (n = 9 in each group) and 5 (n = 7 in each group) weeks after modeling (∗p < 0.05).
Figure 2Histopathology differences of mice in TF group and SF group 3 and 5 weeks after modeling (A) H&E staining of fracture specimens in each group. RUNX2 (B) and Osterix (C) immunohistochemical staining of fracture specimens from TF and SF groups (D–E) Quantitative analysis of RUNX2 and Osterix positive cells (n = 4 in each group, ∗∗p < 0.01) Red arrows indicate RUNX2 and Osterix positive cells.
Figure 3Identification of exosomes (A) Circular membrane-like structures with diameters of about 100 nm under transmission electron microscopy (B) The sample size is concentrated at about 100 nm (C) Western-blotting for exosome markers, TSG101and CD9.
Figure 4The effect of exosomes on the proliferation of MC3T3-E1 cells (A) The concentration of exosomes extracted at different time points (B) The time gradient of the effect of exosomes on the proliferation of MC3T3-E1 cells (C) Cell proliferation of each group of exosomes co-cultured with MC3T3-E1 cells for 24 h. CTRL: without exosomes intervention; NOR: exosomes extracted from normal mice. TF1, TF3, TF7: exosomes extracted on the 1st, 3rd and 7th day after TBI combined with left tibia fracture modeling. SF1, SF3, SF7: exosomes extracted on the 1st, 3rd and 7th day after sham-TBI combined with left tibia fracture modeling (∗p < 0.05).
Figure 5The mRNA and protein expression levels of COL1A1 and RUNX2 (A–B) qPCR analysis of COL1A1 and RUNX2 mRNA expression levels (C–F) Western blotting bands and quantification of COL1A1 and RUNX2 (G–H) Representative immunofluorescence images and quantification analysis of COL1A1 and RUNX2 (∗∗p < 0.01).
Figure 6The matrix mineralization and quantification analysis after osteogenic differentiation under Alizarin Red staining. (A) Representative Alizarin Red staining images. (B) Quantification analysis of OD values of the destained solution from above cells staining. (∗∗ p<0.01).
Figure 7(A) Highly expressed in the TBI group (TF group and T group) and low expressed in the non-TBI group (NOR group and SF group) (B–C) The matrix mineralization and quantification of cells after osteogenic differentiation under Alizarin Red staining (∗∗p < 0.01).