| Literature DB >> 34611217 |
Mahsa Mahmoudinezhad1, Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi2, Houman Kahroba3, Parvin Dehghan4.
Abstract
Obesity prevalence have tripled in the past decades. It is logical to consider new approaches to halt its prevalence. In this concept, considering the effect of interaction between fatty acid desaturase 2 (FADS2) gene variants and dietary advanced glycation end products (AGEs) on obesity-related characteristics seems to be challenging. The present cross-sectional study conducted among 347 obese individuals. A validated semi-quantitative 147-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was used to estimate dietary intakes and American multiethnic database was used to calculate AGEs content of food items which were not available in Iranian Food Composition Table (FCT). FADS2 gene variants were determined according to Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to evaluate the modifier effect of FADS2 gene-dietary AGEs on biochemical values. Based on our findings, no significant differences was reported in term of biochemical variables between AGEs tertiles. In contrast, percent of macronutrients (carbohydrate, protein and fat) of total calorie intake, amount of daily intake of fiber and meat groups showed a significant differences among AGEs tertiles. Furthermore, statistical assays clarified the modifier effects of FADS2 gene-AGEs on weight (Pinteraction = 0.04), fat mass (Pinteraction = 0.03), waist circumference (Pinteraction = 0.008) and cholesterol (Pinteraction = 0.04) level. Accordingly, higher consumption of protein or fat based foods constitute high amount of AGEs and heterozygote genotype for FADS2 tended to show lower level of AGEs content. These findings address further investigation to develop new approaches for nutritional interventions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34611217 PMCID: PMC8492634 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-99077-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure1Mechanisms of AGEs involved in obesity progression.
Figure 2The role of FADS2 gene in polyunsaturated fatty acids promoting obesity.
Figure 3Electrophoretic gels and blots for FADS2 gene.
Comparison of demographic characteristics and anthropometric values in AGEs tertiles.
| Variables | AGEs (kilo unit/gram) | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tertile 1 | Tertile 2 | Tertile 3 | ||
| 42.49 ± 8.66 | 39.94 ± 8.70 | 39.08 ± 9.44 | ||
| 0.18 | ||||
| Male, n (%) | 56 (29.2) | 74 (38.5) | 62 (32.3) | |
| Female, n (%) | 52 (36.1) | 42 (29.2) | 50 (34.7) | |
| Low | 3 (60) | 1 (20) | 1 (20) | 0.42 |
| Middle | 28 (28.3) | 35 (35.4) | 36 (36.4) | |
| High | 20 (24.1) | 36 (43.4) | 27 (32.5) | |
| 0.52 | ||||
| Low | 26 (28.9) | 35 (38.9) | 29 (32.2) | |
| Moderate | 12 (23.1) | 17 (32.7) | 23 (44.2) | |
| High | 13 (28.3) | 20 (43.5) | 13 (28.3) | |
| 91.88 ± 8.66 | 92.05 ± 14.36 | 92.20 ± 14.21 | 0.98 | |
| 33.10 ± 5.36 | 32.31 ± 4.36 | 32.62 ± 4.79 | 0.47 | |
| 36.49 ± 9.05 | 30.94 ± 7.17 | 34.87 ± 10.31 | ||
| 60.66 ± 12.25 | 64.18 ± 11.85 | 61.37 ± 12.87 | 0.23 | |
| 107.37 ± 10.08 | 107.09 ± 9.26 | 105.58 ± 9.51 | 0.32 | |
| 0.93 ± 0.07 | 0.94 ± 0.07 | 0.92 ± 0.08 | 0.06 | |
| 125.05 ± 15.83 | 119.74 ± 14.37 | 122.98 ± 17.64 | ||
| 83.54 ± 10.96 | 79.64 ± 11.05 | 81.61 ± 12.75 | ||
SES Socio-economic status, BMI Body Mass Index, FM Fat Mass, FFM Fat free mass, WC Waist Circumference, WHR Waist-to-Hip ratio, SBP Systolic Blood Pressure, DBP Diastolic Blood Pressure; values are presented based on mead (SD). Comparison was done using chi-square and One-Way ANOVA. *P values based on ANCOVA adjusted for age and sex. Bold values provide the significant threshold of P < 0.05.
Comparison of biochemical values in AGEs tertiles.
| Variables | AGEs (kilo unit/gram) | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tertile 1 | Tertile 2 | Tertile 3 | ||
| TC (mg/dL) | 194.42 ± 38.32 | 191.67 ± 35.61 | 189.33 ± 36.90 | 0.59 |
| HDL (mg/dL) | 43.24 ± 9.93 | 43.65 ± 9.04 | 43.78 ± 9.71 | 0.90 |
| LDL (mg/dL) | 125.15 ± 34.00 | 124.59 ± 31.70 | 120.94 ± 30.70 | 0.57 |
| TG (mg/dL) | 42.00, 765.00 | 33.00, 417.00 | 38.00, 768.00 | 0.18 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 64.00, 193.00 | 50.00, 125.00 | 64.00, 314.00 | 0.24 |
| Insulin (U/mL) | 2.20, 81.5 | 1.5, 65.10 | 1.80, 150.80 | 0.49 |
| HOMA-IR | 0.49, 15.09 | 0.25, 18.49 | 0.29, 32.02 | 0.40 |
| QUICKI | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.33 ± 0.03 | 0.33 ± 0.03 | 0.67 |
| Ag-RP (pg/mL) | 29.44 ± 14.28 | 29.25 ± 17.28 | 34.15 ± 22.87 | 0.25 |
| α-MSH (ng/L) | 199.68 ± 137.01 | 202.09 ± 150.41 | 249.76 ± 200.35 | 0.17 |
TC Total cholesterol, HDL High density lipoprotein, LDL Low density lipoprotein, TG Triglyceride, Ag-RP Agouti related peptide, α-MSH α-Melanocyte stimulating hormone. Values are presented based on mead (SD) or median (min, max). Comparison was done using One-Way ANOVA and Kruskal–Wallis. *P values based on ANCOVA adjusted for age and sex.
Comparison of daily macronutrients intake/ calorie intake across AGEs tertiles.
| Variables | AGEs (kilo unit/gram) | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tertile 1 | Tertile 2 | Tertile 3 | ||
| CHO/Cal.% | 60.26 ± 7.74 | 59.12 ± 6.14 | 54.85 ± 6.90 | < 0.001 |
| Pro/Cal% | 12.22 ± 2.39 | 13.20 ± 1.68 | 13.43 ± 1.74 | 0.005 |
| Fat/Cal% | 29.96 ± 7.94 | 30.26 ± 6.23 | 34.56 ± 5.89 | < 0.001 |
| Total fiber (gram) | 22.36, 311.76 | 16.21, 195.92 | 9.86, 200.64 | < 0.001 |
| Meats group (gram) | 0.13, 5.81 | 0.59, 9.92 | 0.48, 7.90 | 0.006 |
CHO Carbohydrate, Pro Protein. Comparison was done using One-Way ANOVA and Kruskal–Wallis. *P values based on ANCOVA adjusted for age and sex.
Comparison of dietary AGEs content in different FADS2 genotypes.
| Variables | Genotype | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC | CT | TT | ||
| Dietary AGEs content (kilo unit/gram) | 38.38 ± 7.39 | 37.23 ± 7.15 | 39.43 ± 6.62 | 0.43 |
*P values based on One-Way ANOVA.
Figure 4Interactions between FADS2 genotypes and different dietary AGEs tertiles to modify metabolic factors.