Literature DB >> 34609640

Outcome of patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy: a single institution retrospective analysis.

Nadia Bianco1, Monica Milano2, Eleonora Pagan3, Chiara Oriecuia4, Vincenzo Bagnardi3, Elena Guerini Rocco5, Giorgia Irene Santomauro6, Giulia Peruzzotti6, Marco Colleoni2, Giuseppe Viale5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is associated with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. It is known to be high immunogenic, with a high level of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. PD-L1 expression in TNBC does not have a clear prognostic relevance. In this study, we aimed to assess survival outcomes according to PD-L1 expression in the real world.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed mTNBC patients treated with first-line chemotherapy at European Institute of Oncology with evaluable PD-L1 expression. Primary endpoints were Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) according to PD-L1 expression.
RESULTS: From January 2000 to December 2018, 190 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria for final analysis. PD-L1 positive (≥ 1%) subgroup showed a median PFS of 6.8 vs 5.6 months in PD-L1 negative subgroup (PFS-HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.89-1.74, p-value = 0.191), while at data cutoff we had 120 deaths in the PD-L1 < 1% population with a median OS of 22.1 months and 42 deaths in PD-L1 positive patients with a median OS of 20.8 months (OS-HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.76-1.55, p-value = 0.64). No difference in PFS and OS was related to the choice of chemotherapy (p-value for PFS: 0.19, p-value for OS: 0.53).
CONCLUSION: No differences in clinical outcome were found according to PD-L1 status or chemotherapy regimen chosen. In "unselected" patients, single agent or combination chemotherapy could be appropriate, although in the immunotherapy era patients with newly diagnosed mTNBC should be routinely tested for PD-L1 status. The variability in PD-L1 expression by metastatic site warrants further investigation.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  First-line chemotherapy; Immunotherapy; PD-L1 expression; Triple negative breast cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34609640     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06407-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  10 in total

1.  Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes are prognostic in triple negative breast cancer and predictive for trastuzumab benefit in early breast cancer: results from the FinHER trial.

Authors:  S Loi; S Michiels; R Salgado; N Sirtaine; V Jose; D Fumagalli; P-L Kellokumpu-Lehtinen; P Bono; V Kataja; C Desmedt; M J Piccart; S Loibl; C Denkert; M J Smyth; H Joensuu; C Sotiriou
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Outcomes of systemic therapy for advanced triple-negative breast cancer: A single centre experience.

Authors:  Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti; David Okonji; Thubeena Manickavasagar; Kabir Mohammed; Mark Allen; Alistair Ring
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 4.380

3.  Lack of Robust Prognostic Biomarkers for Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer-Adverse Events-In Reply.

Authors:  Sylvia Adams; Elizabeth A Mittendorf
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 31.777

4.  Time trends of overall survival among metastatic breast cancer patients in the real-life ESME cohort.

Authors:  Elisa Gobbini; Monia Ezzalfani; Véronique Dieras; Thomas Bachelot; Etienne Brain; Marc Debled; William Jacot; Marie Ange Mouret-Reynier; Anthony Goncalves; Florence Dalenc; Anne Patsouris; Jean Marc Ferrero; Christelle Levy; Veronique Lorgis; Laurence Vanlemmens; Claudia Lefeuvre-Plesse; Simone Mathoulin-Pelissier; Thierry Petit; Lionel Uwer; Christelle Jouannaud; Marianne Leheurteur; Magali Lacroix-Triki; Audrey Lardy Cleaud; Mathieu Robain; Coralie Courtinard; Christian Cailliot; David Perol; Suzette Delaloge
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 5.  Triple-negative breast cancer--current status and future directions.

Authors:  O Gluz; C Liedtke; N Gottschalk; L Pusztai; U Nitz; N Harbeck
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Impact of Specimen Characteristics on PD-L1 Testing in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Validation of the IASLC PD-L1 Testing Recommendations.

Authors:  Andréanne Gagné; Emily Wang; Nathalie Bastien; Michèle Orain; Patrice Desmeules; Sylvain Pagé; Sylvain Trahan; Christian Couture; David Joubert; Philippe Joubert
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 7.  Deconstructing the molecular portraits of breast cancer.

Authors:  Aleix Prat; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 8.  Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 in Breast Cancer: Technical Aspects, Prognostic Implications, and Predictive Value.

Authors:  Federica Miglietta; Gaia Griguolo; Valentina Guarneri; Maria Vittoria Dieci
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-08-23

9.  Comparison of PD-L1 protein expression between primary tumors and metastatic lesions in triple negative breast cancers.

Authors:  Mariya Rozenblit; Richard Huang; Natalie Danziger; Priti Hegde; Brian Alexander; Shakti Ramkissoon; Kim Blenman; Jeffrey S Ross; David L Rimm; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 13.751

10.  Loss of antigenicity with tissue age in breast cancer.

Authors:  Susan E Combs; Gang Han; Nikita Mani; Susan Beruti; Michael Nerenberg; David L Rimm
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 5.502

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.