Literature DB >> 29660596

Time trends of overall survival among metastatic breast cancer patients in the real-life ESME cohort.

Elisa Gobbini1, Monia Ezzalfani2, Véronique Dieras3, Thomas Bachelot4, Etienne Brain3, Marc Debled5, William Jacot6, Marie Ange Mouret-Reynier7, Anthony Goncalves8, Florence Dalenc9, Anne Patsouris10, Jean Marc Ferrero11, Christelle Levy12, Veronique Lorgis13, Laurence Vanlemmens14, Claudia Lefeuvre-Plesse15, Simone Mathoulin-Pelissier16, Thierry Petit17, Lionel Uwer18, Christelle Jouannaud19, Marianne Leheurteur20, Magali Lacroix-Triki21, Audrey Lardy Cleaud2, Mathieu Robain22, Coralie Courtinard22, Christian Cailliot22, David Perol2, Suzette Delaloge23.   

Abstract

AIM: Real-life analysis of overall survival (OS) trends among metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients may help define medical needs and evaluate the impact of public health investments. The present study aimed to evaluate the independent impact of the year of MBC diagnosis on OS in the Epidemio-Strategy-Medical-Economical (ESME)-MBC cohort.
METHODS: ESME-MBC (NCT03275311) is a French, national, multicentre, observational cohort including 16,702 consecutive newly diagnosed MBC patients (01 January 2008-31 December 2014). Of 16,680 eligible patients, 15,085 had full immunohistochemistry data, allowing classification as hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-, N = 9907), HER2-positive (HER2+, N = 2861) or triple-negative (HR-/HER2-, N = 2317) subcohorts. Multivariate analyses of OS were conducted among the full ESME cohort and subcohorts.
RESULTS: Median OS of the whole cohort was 37.22 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 36.3-38.04). Year of diagnosis was an independent predictor of OS (hazard ratio 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-1.00], P = .01) together with age, subtype, disease-free interval, visceral metastases and number of organs involved. Median OS of HR+/HER2-, HER2+ and HR-/HER2- subcohorts was, respectively, 42.12 (95% CI, 40.90-43.10), 44.91 (95% CI, 42.51-47.90) and 14.52 (95% CI, 13.70-15.24) months. Year of diagnosis was a strong independent predictor of OS in HER2+ subcohort (hazard ratio 0.91 [95% CI, 0.88-0.94], P < .001), but not in HR+/HER2- nor HR-/HER2- subcohorts (hazard ratio 1.00 [95% CI, 0.98-1.01], P = .80 and 1.00 [95% CI, 0.97-1.02], P = .90, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The OS of MBC patients has slightly improved over the past decade. However, this effect is confined to HER2+ cases, highlighting the need of new strategies in the other subtypes.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HER2; Metastatic breast cancer; Overall survival; Subtypes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29660596     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  61 in total

1.  HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer: Epidemiology, Prescription Patterns, Healthcare Resource Utilisation and Costs from a Large Italian Real-World Database.

Authors:  Carlo Piccinni; Letizia Dondi; Giulia Ronconi; Silvia Calabria; Antonella Pedrini; Immacolata Esposito; Nello Martini; Maurizio Marangolo
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  Biomarkers of response to camrelizumab combined with apatinib: an analysis from a phase II trial in advanced triple-negative breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Jieqiong Liu; Ying Li; Qian Li; Dandan Liang; Quanren Wang; Qiang Liu
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 3.  Immune Checkpoint Inhibition for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Current Landscape and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Huimei Yi; Ying Li; Yuan Tan; Shujun Fu; Faqing Tang; Xiyun Deng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients With Resistance to Standard Systemic Chemotherapies.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Furuta; Junichiro Watanabe; Takeshi Aramaki; Akifumi Notsu; Hirofumi Yasui
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Comparison of outcomes in a population-based cohort of metastatic breast cancer patients receiving anti-HER2 therapy with clinical trial outcomes.

Authors:  Inna Y Gong; Andrew T Yan; Craig C Earle; Maureen E Trudeau; Andrea Eisen; Kelvin K W Chan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Direct Medical Costs of Advanced Breast Cancer Treatment: A Real-World Study in the Southeast of The Netherlands.

Authors:  Paul Peter Schneider; Bram L Ramaekers; Xavier Pouwels; Sandra Geurts; Khava Ibragimova; Maaike de Boer; Birgit Vriens; Yes van de Wouw; Marien den Boer; Manon Pepels; Vivianne Tjan-Heijnen; Manuela Joore
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 5.725

7.  Circulating tumor cell count: A reliable biomarker for treatment selection in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Bingzhen Li; Ying Zheng
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Nab-paclitaxel and atezolizumab for the treatment of PD-L1-positive, metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: review and future directions.

Authors:  Jodi A Kagihara; Michelle Andress; Jennifer R Diamond
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2020-02-20

9.  Long-Lasting Response after Pembrolizumab in a Patient with Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Paloma Peinado; Carmen Ramírez; José Angel García-Sáenz; Alejandro Pascual; Jesús Fuentes-Antrás; Natalia Vidal; Mónica Antoñanzas; Fernando Moreno
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Emerging Concepts in the Surgical Management of Peri-Acetabular Metastatic Bone Disease.

Authors:  Aaron Gazendam; Daniel Axelrod; David Wilson; Michelle Ghert
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.