Literature DB >> 34609409

Assessment of programmed death-ligand 1 receptor immunohistochemical expression and its association with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and p53 status in triple-negative breast cancer.

Mariana Deacu1, Liliana Ana Tuţă, Mădălina Boşoteanu, Mariana Aşchie, Anca Florentina Mitroi, Antonela Anca Nicolau, Manuela Enciu, Oana Cojocaru, Lucian Cristian Petcu, Gabriela Izabela Bălţătescu.   

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is the second most frequent type of cancer for both sexes combined, after lung cancer. Triple-negative BC (TNBC) molecular subtype is characterized by lack of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunoexpression or amplification and represent 10-20% of all BC cases. The issue of the present study was to analyze the associations between programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunoexpression and distribution of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (stTILs) combined with clinico-morphological features of patients with TNBC. Secondly, our research evaluated PD-L1 immunoexpression as a prognostic factor and its correlation with p53 immunoexpression. Thirty cases with primary TNBC without prior neoadjuvant therapy were included in this research. stTILs were identified in all cases, most of them with low distribution (66.7%). A positive immunoreaction for PD-L1 was observed in 40% of cases. The PD-L1 immunoexpression was statistically significant associated with age, pathological tumor size, lymphovascular invasion, stTILs level, the presence of cluster of differentiation 8-positive (CD8+) TILs and p53 immunoexpression. In the present study, a positive PD-L1 immunoexpression was associated with a worse distant metastasis free survival (DMFS). We also found not only that high stTILs level were associated with a better DMFS but also that there was a statistically significant association between stTILs level and PD-L1 immunoexpression. Our results bring new insights to the fine connections between tumor microenvironment and molecular changes of TNBC. It helps us to better understand these aggressive tumors to identify the more useful biomarkers for predicting the response to adjuvant therapy and can represent a method for selecting the most suitable patients for immunotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34609409      PMCID: PMC8597365          DOI: 10.47162/RJME.62.1.06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rom J Morphol Embryol        ISSN: 1220-0522            Impact factor:   1.033


⧉ Introduction

Breast cancer (BC) is the second most frequent type of cancer for both sexes combined, after lung cancer, with a 16.6% incidence worldwide, according to Bray et al. (2018) [1]. In the last two decades, numerous studies highlighted the huge heterogeneity of the BC and tailor therapies were developed to improve the survival and quality of life for these patients. Despite of all efforts, BC continues to be the leading cause of death in female population in more than 100 countries, with 15% mortality rate worldwide [1]. From the first molecular classification of BC realized by Perou et al. in 2000 [2] and Sørlie et al. in 2001 [3], huge progresses have been done in understanding the molecular biology of different morphological subtypes of BC and four molecular surrogate subtypes of BC emerged at the St. Gallen Consensus in 2013, with different therapeutic and prognostic implications: luminal A-like, luminal B-like, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and triple-negative BC (TNBC). Their definition is based on the immunoexpression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), proliferation rate and immunoexpression or amplification of HER2 [4]. TNBC subtype is characterized by lack of ER, PR and HER2 immunoexpression or amplification and represents 10–20% of all BC cases [5]. But this category of BCs is not a simple one and, in fact, it is extremely heterogeneous. It includes different morphological subtypes of BC, and it is associated with variable prognosis. Most of them have an aggressive clinical behavior comparing with the other subtypes. The heterogeneity of TNBC is under the debate of several studies, which try to characterize it furthermore, to unravel new potential therapeutic agents which can improve the overall survival (OS). A special attention is paid to immune microenvironment of the tumors and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) emerge as a biomarker for the immunogenicity of BC. High value of TILs is associated with an improvement of disease-free survival (DFS) and OS in TNBC, and it can be used as a strong prognostic factor [6,7,8]. The composition of TILs is complex, 75% of TILs are represented by T-lymphocytes, most of them being cluster of differentiation (CD)8+ (cytotoxic T-lymphocytes) and secondly CD4+ (T-helper cells) [9]. One way of the malignant cell to escape from immune defense is through the axis of programmed death 1 (PD1) receptor and its ligand [programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)]. PD1 receptor, known also as “checkpoint molecule”, is expressed mainly on the mononuclear inflammatory cells and its activation by PD-L1 or PD-L2 ligands acts as a “brake” for the immune response [10]. Therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) not only proved its efficacy in several aggressive cancers, like melanoma or non-small cell lung carcinoma, but recently is considered as a therapeutic option for metastatic or locally advanced TNBC [11]. Aim The aim of the present study was to analyze the associations between PD-L1 immunoexpression and distribution of stromal TILs (stTILs) in conjunction with clinico-morphological features of patients with TNBC from a single institution in southeastern of Romania. The second objective was to evaluate the value of PD-L1 immunoexpression as a prognostic factor and its correlation with p53 immunoexpression.

⧉ Patients, Materials and Methods

Patient cohort In the present study, cases were selected from the recoded medical data and electronic database of the Department of Clinical Pathology between 2014 and 2018. We identified all the patients clinically diagnosed with BC in the Department of Surgery of our Hospital, which proved to be ER/PR negative and with a HER2/neu negative status evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or/and by chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH). All these cases were reviewed according to internal protocol of the Department of Clinical Pathology based on criteria of World Health Organization (WHO) breast tumor [12] and recommendations of St. Gallen Consensus, to establish molecular surrogate subtypes [4]. Thirty cases with primary TNBC without prior neoadjuvant therapy were included in this research. Clinico-morphological features were taken from pathological file of the patients including: age at the time of diagnosis, type of surgery, tumor size, morphological type of BC, tumor grade, the presence of in situ component, lymphovascular invasion, lymph node status, presence or absence of distant metastasis and type of adjuvant therapy followed by the patient after surgical intervention. It has been also recorded the date when distant metastases had been identified and the last date of follow-up, both criteria being useful for survival analysis. Incomplete clinical data or preoperative neoadjuvant therapy were considered as exclusion criteria. A written consent signed by each patient included in our study was available. TILs evaluation TILs evaluation was performed on usual Hematoxylin–Eosin (HE) whole stained slides according to the Guidelines established by the International TILs Working Group 2014 [13] by a trained pathologist on scoring TILs using the available on-line resource [13,14]. A semiquantitative analysis of stTILs was performed as a continuous parameter (increment of 10%). The percentage of stTILs was defined by the average area occupied by all mononuclear inflammatory cell over total intra-tumoral connective tissue stroma, which was considered the adjacent area to invasive tumor [13]. For statistical analyses, it was further stratified in categorical variable in which absent or focal stTILs if <10%, low stTILs if the score was ≥10% – <50% and high stTILs if ≥50% [15]. Immunohistochemical staining and evaluation The most representative formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded blocks were sectioned 4 μm thick and followed the immunostaining protocol for manual method. Incubation of slides was done using the following ready-to-use, primary antibodies from Master Diagnóstica (Granada, Spain): rabbit anti-human PD-L1 monoclonal antibody (clone CAL10); rabbit anti-human p53 monoclonal antibody (clone SP5); rabbit anti-human CD8 monoclonal antibody (clone SP16). Master Polymer Plus Detection System, which include 3,3’-Diaminobenzidine (DAB) chromogen, was used for detection and brown staining of antigen concerned. The final step consisted in counterstaining with Mayer’s Hematoxylin and mounting the slides. Tonsil was used as positive control for PD-L1 and CD8 biomarkers and serous carcinoma of the ovary as positive control for p53 assessment. HER2 status was reviewed using the recommendations of American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) 2018 [16]. Statistical analysis In the current research, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20.0 (SPSS Inc.; Chicago, IL, USA) software was used for data recording and statistical analysis. Each data was labeled as either nominal or quantitative variable. A descriptive statistic was performed for quantitative variables. Comparisons of ratios in independent groups were performed with χ (chi-squared) test. Kaplan–Meier method was applied to obtain the cumulative percentages of distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) time followed by log-rank tank test for further analyze. DMFS was defined as the time from initial diagnose to the time of distant metastasis. Those cases without distant metastases or those cases in which the follow-up had been lost before the established period of two years, were labeled as censored. A two-tailed p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

⧉ Results

Thirty female patients were included in current study, with a mean age of 62.47±11.649 years (from 43 to 84 years), from which 73.3% were more than 50 years old. Most of the patients underwent radical mastectomies ± regional lymphadenectomy, with a mean tumor diameter 42±34.482 mm (10–180 mm) and 16.7% of them were multifocal tumors. Regarding the morphological type, we observed a high prevalence for invasive ductal carcinoma–not otherwise specified (IDC–NOS) in our group (80%) and the remaining were represented by three cases of IDC with medullary features (Figure 1A,1B,1C,1D), one case of IDC with sebaceous differentiation, and one case with inflammatory BC. High histopathological grade was recorded in 63.4% of our cohort, most of them (75%) having also a positive reaction for PD-L1 (Figure 2). An intraductal component was observed in 66.7% of cases and lymphovascular invasion was noted within 15 cases. stTILs were identified in all cases, with mean 44±22.984, most of them with low distribution (66.7% of cases). According to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor stages, we observed that pT2 was the most frequent one (40%) followed by pT3 and pT4, each with six cases. The mean time of follow-up was 16.2±7.286 months (range 2–24 months).
Figure 1

Representative morphological and IHC features of a TNBC, IDC with medullary architecture: (A) High stTILs level (HE staining, ×100); (B) Positive membranous immunostaining for anti-PD-L1 antibody in more than 1% of immune cells adjacent to tumor cells (IHC, ×200); (C) Positive nuclear immunostaining for CD8 TILs in more than 10% of tumor cells (IHC, ×40); (D) “Null-type” immunoexpression for p53 (IHC, ×40). CD8: Cluster of differentiation 8; HE: Hematoxylin–Eosin; IDC: Invasive ductal carcinoma; IHC: Immunohistochemistry; PD-L1: Programmed death-ligand 1; stTILs: Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; TNBC: Triple-negative breast cancer

Figure 2

Representative morphological and IHC features of a TNBC, IDC–NOS, poorly differentiated G3: (A) Low stTILs level (HE staining, ×100); (B) Positive membranous immunostaining for anti-PD-L1 antibody in more than 1% of immune cells and tumor cells (IHC, ×200); (C) Positive nuclear immunostaining for CD8 TILs in more than 10% of tumor cells (IHC, ×40); (D) “Overexpression” immunostaining for p53 (IHC, ×40). CD8: Cluster of differentiation 8; HE: Hematoxylin–Eosin; IDC–NOS: Invasive ductal carcinoma–not otherwise specified; IHC: Immunohistochemistry; PD-L1: Programmed death-ligand 1; stTILs: Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; TNBC: Triple-negative breast cancer

Representative morphological and IHC features of a TNBC, IDC with medullary architecture: (A) High stTILs level (HE staining, ×100); (B) Positive membranous immunostaining for anti-PD-L1 antibody in more than 1% of immune cells adjacent to tumor cells (IHC, ×200); (C) Positive nuclear immunostaining for CD8 TILs in more than 10% of tumor cells (IHC, ×40); (D) “Null-type” immunoexpression for p53 (IHC, ×40). CD8: Cluster of differentiation 8; HE: Hematoxylin–Eosin; IDC: Invasive ductal carcinoma; IHC: Immunohistochemistry; PD-L1: Programmed death-ligand 1; stTILs: Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; TNBC: Triple-negative breast cancer We analyzed the pattern of distribution and the percentage of positive cells for each antibody. A positive immunoreaction for PD-L1 was considered when >1% of mononuclear inflammatory cells from the stromal compartment or/and tumor cells are membranous stained [17] and it was observed in 40% of cases, from which 58.3% were positive in only stTILs (Figure 1B) and 16.7% positive only in tumor cells. A simultaneous positive immunostaining of both compartments was identified in 11 cases (Figure 2B). Associations between PD-L1 immunoexpression and the main clinico-pathological and IHC features of the cases included in our study are detailed in Table 1.
Table 1

Clinico-pathological features of TNBC according to PD-L1 immunoexpression

Clinico-pathological features

PD-L1 negative

n (%)

PD-L1 positive

n (%)

χ2 score

p-value*

Total cases

18 (60.0%)

12 (40.0%)

 

 

Age [years]

 

 

5.568

0.018

▪ ≤50

2 (11.1%)

6 (50.0%)

 

 

▪ ˃50

16 (88.9%)

6 (50.0%)

 

 

Morphological type

 

 

0.139

0.709

▪ IDC–NOS

14 (77.8%)

10 (83.3%)

 

 

▪ Others

4 (22.2%)

2 (16.7%)

 

 

Tumoral grade (G)

 

 

1.172

0.279

▪ G2

8 (44.4%)

3 (25.0 %)

 

 

▪ G3

10 (55.6%)

9 (75.0%)

 

 

DCIS

 

 

0.625

0.429

▪ Yes

13 (72.2%)

7 (58.3%)

 

 

▪ No

5 (27.8%)

5 (41.7%)

 

 

Pathological tumor size (pT)

 

 

5.000

0.025

▪ pT1–pT2

12 (66.7%)

3 (25.0%)

 

 

▪ pT3–pT4

6 (33.7%)

9 (75.0%)

 

 

Pathological lymph node status (pN)

 

 

2.738

0.098

▪ <3

10 (55.6%)

3 (25.0%)

 

 

▪ ≥3

8 (44.4%)

9 (75.0%)

 

 

Lymphovascular invasion

 

 

5.000

0.025

▪ No

12 (66.7%)

3 (25.0%)

 

 

▪ Yes

6 (33.3%)

9 (75.0%)

 

 

stTILs level

 

 

5.625

0.018

▪ <50%

9 (50.0%)

11 (91.7%)

 

 

▪ ≥50%

9 (50.0%)

1 (8.3%)

 

 

CD8 TILs

 

 

8.167

0.004

▪ Negative (CD8– TILs)

4 (22.2%)

9 (75.0%)

 

 

▪ Positive (CD8+ TILs)

14 (77.8%)

3 (25.0%)

 

 

Ki67 status

 

 

1.118

0.290

▪ Low Ki67 index

3 (16.7%)

4 (33.4%)

 

 

▪ High Ki67 index

15 (83.3%)

8 (66.7%)

 

 

p53 immunoexpression

 

 

4.043

0.044

▪ p53 nonmutated

14 (73.7%)

5 (26.3%)

 

 

▪ p53 mutated

4 (36.4%)

7 (63.6%)

 

 

Metastatic relapse

 

 

15.648

<0.001

▪ No

16 (88.9%)

2 (16.7%)

 

 

▪ Yes

2 (11.1%)

10 (83.3)

 

 

CD8: Cluster of differentiation 8; DCIS: Ductal carcinoma in situ; IDC–NOS: Invasive ductal carcinoma–not otherwise specified; n: No. of cases; PD-L1: Programmed death-ligand 1; stTILs: Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; TNBC: Triple-negative breast cancer. *Chi-squared test

The most statistically significant associations were represented by age more than 50 years old (p=0.018), pathological tumor size (p=0.025), lymphovascular invasion (p=0.025), stTILs level (p=0.018), the presence of CD8+ TILs (p=0.004), and p53 immunoexpression (p=0.044) (Table 1). Representative morphological and IHC features of a TNBC, IDC–NOS, poorly differentiated G3: (A) Low stTILs level (HE staining, ×100); (B) Positive membranous immunostaining for anti-PD-L1 antibody in more than 1% of immune cells and tumor cells (IHC, ×200); (C) Positive nuclear immunostaining for CD8 TILs in more than 10% of tumor cells (IHC, ×40); (D) “Overexpression” immunostaining for p53 (IHC, ×40). CD8: Cluster of differentiation 8; HE: Hematoxylin–Eosin; IDC–NOS: Invasive ductal carcinoma–not otherwise specified; IHC: Immunohistochemistry; PD-L1: Programmed death-ligand 1; stTILs: Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; TNBC: Triple-negative breast cancer Clinico-pathological features of TNBC according to PD-L1 immunoexpression Clinico-pathological features PD-L1 negative PD-L1 positive score -value* Total cases 18 (60.0%) 12 (40.0%) Age [years] 5.568 0.018 ▪ ≤50 2 (11.1%) 6 (50.0%) ▪ ˃50 16 (88.9%) 6 (50.0%) Morphological type 0.139 0.709 ▪ IDC–NOS 14 (77.8%) 10 (83.3%) ▪ Others 4 (22.2%) 2 (16.7%) Tumoral grade (G) 1.172 0.279 ▪ G2 8 (44.4%) 3 (25.0 %) ▪ G3 10 (55.6%) 9 (75.0%) DCIS 0.625 0.429 ▪ Yes 13 (72.2%) 7 (58.3%) ▪ No 5 (27.8%) 5 (41.7%) Pathological tumor size (pT) 5.000 0.025 ▪ pT1–pT2 12 (66.7%) 3 (25.0%) ▪ pT3–pT4 6 (33.7%) 9 (75.0%) Pathological lymph node status (pN) 2.738 0.098 ▪ <3 10 (55.6%) 3 (25.0%) ▪ ≥3 8 (44.4%) 9 (75.0%) Lymphovascular invasion 5.000 0.025 ▪ No 12 (66.7%) 3 (25.0%) ▪ Yes 6 (33.3%) 9 (75.0%) stTILs level 5.625 0.018 ▪ <50% 9 (50.0%) 11 (91.7%) ▪ ≥50% 9 (50.0%) 1 (8.3%) CD8 TILs 8.167 0.004 ▪ Negative (CD8– TILs) 4 (22.2%) 9 (75.0%) ▪ Positive (CD8+ TILs) 14 (77.8%) 3 (25.0%) Ki67 status 1.118 0.290 ▪ Low Ki67 index 3 (16.7%) 4 (33.4%) ▪ High Ki67 index 15 (83.3%) 8 (66.7%) p53 immunoexpression 4.043 0.044 ▪ p53 nonmutated 14 (73.7%) 5 (26.3%) ▪ p53 mutated 4 (36.4%) 7 (63.6%) Metastatic relapse 15.648 <0.001 ▪ No 16 (88.9%) 2 (16.7%) ▪ Yes 2 (11.1%) 10 (83.3) CD8: Cluster of differentiation 8; DCIS: Ductal carcinoma in situ; IDC–NOS: Invasive ductal carcinoma–not otherwise specified; n: No. of cases; PD-L1: Programmed death-ligand 1; stTILs: Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; TNBC: Triple-negative breast cancer. *Chi-squared test A membranous staining of the stTILs in more than 10% of cells was considered the cutoff for a positive immunoreaction to CD8 biomarker [18] and it was recorded for 56.7% of all cases (CD8+ TILs) (Figures 1C and 2C). It was observed only three cases with CD8+ TILs from those which had also a positive immunostaining for PD-L1, but a higher rate (77.8%) was noticed in the PD-L1 negative category. A positive immunostaining for p53 was consider when the nuclei were brown-stained, and 10% value was considered as the cut-off point [19]. The intensity and distribution of p53 immunostaining was also analyzed: “null-type” – no nuclear staining; “wild-type” – weakly and focal brown nuclear staining; “overexpression” – strong and diffuse nuclear staining [20]. An aberrant p53 protein immunoexpression (“null-type” and “overexpression” type) was observed in 36.7% of cases, from which 63.6% were “overexpression” type (Figure 2D). The vast majority of those cases with an “overexpression” pattern (85.7%) were noticed in the CD8+ TILs category. Ki67 index was reassessed using criteria of the St. Gallen Consensus 2015, in which a 20% value was recommended as a cut-off value for low/high level of proliferate tumoral rate [21]. Median value for Ki67 index was 60, interquartile range (IQR) (30–80), most of the tumors having a high proliferation rate (76.7%). Most of the tumors with an immunopositive reaction for PD-L1 were associated with a high Ki67 index (66.7%). PD-L1 immunoexpression proved to have a significant influence on DMFS, analyzed by Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test, with p<0.0001 [PD-L1 negative: mean 22.471, 95% confidence interval (CI): 20.473–24.468; PD-L1 positive: mean 11.375, 95% CI: 7.788–14.962] (Figure 3A). A statistically significant differences regarding DMFS was also observed for stTILs values with an improvement for high values of stTILs, p=0.014 (low stTILs: mean 15.359, 95% CI: 11.872–18.846; high stTILs: mean 22.800, 95% CI: 20.569–25.031) (Figure 3B). A CD8+ TILs also had a statistically significant positive effect on MDFS with p<0.001 (CD8– TILs: mean 12.215, 95% CI: 8.247–16.184; CD8+ TILs: mean 21.765, 95% CI: 19.462–24.068) (Figure 3C). The p53 status (mutational and non-mutational) has also an impact on DMFS with p=0.010 (p53 non-mutated: mean 20.659, 95% CI: 17.702–23.617; p53 mutated: mean 13.727, 95% CI: 9.495–17.960) (Figure 3D).
Figure 3

Kaplan–Meier curves for DMFS analyses of TNBC patients according to PD-L1 immunoexpression (A), stTILs level (B), CD8 TILs immunoexpression (C) and p53 status (D). CD8: Cluster of differentiation 8; DMFS: Distant metastasis free survival; PD-L1: Programmed death-ligand 1; stTILs: Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; TNBC: Triple-negative breast cancer

⧉ Discussions

TNBC is a relatively rare type of molecular subtype of BC, which is associated with a poor prognosis. Its morphological features and molecular changes make it difficult to treat, being responsible for up to 25% of BC deaths [22]. Because it is not responsive to hormonotherapy or to the Trastuzumab, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are the only accepted possibilities as an adjuvant therapy for these patients. Immunotherapy is a new approach to treat tumors which are highly “immunogenic” (tumors who have the capacity to induce host adaptive immunity). ICIs can have a negative impact on tumor progression and huge successes were obtained when this new form of therapy was approved and administrated in a variety of malignancy, resulting in great improvements of DFS and OS [23,24]. Starting from this point, which it was considered a “breakthrough of the year 2013” [25], a special attention was paid to the distribution and quantity of immune infiltrate through different morphological subtype of BC. In 2019, a big step was done by obtaining the approval of Atezolizumab (an ICI drug which target the PD-L1) as adjuvant therapy for advance or metastatic TNBC, secondary to the results obtained by IMpassion130, a phase III trial [11, 26]. Nevertheless, less than half of patients will benefit from immunotherapy [27] and further studies are necessary to refine those biological factors which can be used as predictive and prognostic factors. Kaplan–Meier curves for DMFS analyses of TNBC patients according to PD-L1 immunoexpression (A), stTILs level (B), CD8 TILs immunoexpression (C) and p53 status (D). CD8: Cluster of differentiation 8; DMFS: Distant metastasis free survival; PD-L1: Programmed death-ligand 1; stTILs: Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; TNBC: Triple-negative breast cancer In our study, we identified 40.0% of cases positive for PD-L1 in more than 1% of either tumor cells or stromal inflammatory cells. Differences between PD-L1 immunoexpression and clinico-morphological features were analyzed, and we observed a statistically significant differences with age (≤/>50 years old), a positive PD-L1 immunoexpression being associated with less than 50 years old. In the research of Zeng et al. (2019), which included 132 cases of TNBC, it was also observed statistically significant association with age, but a PD-L1 immunopositive tumors were more frequent associated with more than 50 years old, and no association with menopausal status [22]. In concordance with literature, the most predominant morphological type was represented by IDC-NOS, with no statistically significant differences between PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative group [22]. The same result was observed for “in situ” component, which was identified in 58.3% of PD-L1 positive cases. All ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) had not HER2/neu immunoexpression, having a perfect concordance with the invasive component, as it was previously reported [28]. Even if some researches proved to be an association between PD-L1 immuno-expression and tumoral grade or tumor proliferation rate, our study showed no statistically significant differences between PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative group, both being characterized by high rates of poorly differentiated tumors and high Ki67 index. We recorded a positive correlation for tumor diameter, the presence of lymphovascular invasion and the present of metastasis in more than three loco-regional lymph nodes (Table 1), similar with other studies [29,30]. In the present study, a positive PD-L1 immunoexpression is associated with a worse DMFS. This result is in concordance with data from the literature which also emphasized the negative impact of PD-L1 immunoexpression over the DMFS in previous untreated patients [22, 31,32]. But not all the studies had the same results as there are reports which had shown a better survival if there is high (>10%) PD-L1 immunoexpression on tumor cells [33,34]. All these divergent results reported in the literature lead to the necessity to further explore the role of PD-L1 immunoexpression on larger cohort for a longer period of follow-up, taking in considerations all the factors which can influence the prognosis. Because TNBC is characterized by a highly tumor mutational burden, this leads to an enhancement of immune response and consecutively an increase levels of stTILs compared to other molecular BC subtypes [35]. The prognostic value of stTILs in TNBC was highlighted by several studies and clinical phase III trials, like FinHer trial [36] or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 2197 + ECOG 1199 [37]. Quantification of stTILs level is nowadays included in the last edition of breast tumors classification from WHO 2019, as a useful prognostic biomarker [12]. An increase with 10% of stTILs is associated with 15% reduced risk of relapse and 17% reduced risk of death regardless of adjuvant therapy [15]. Even if there are reports which demonstrated that high stTILs levels are more common in TNBC, still their levels varied great among tumors belonging to this BC molecular subgroup. In the present research, 33.3% of the cases had high stTILs level, consistent with other reports which demonstrated an increased level of stTILs in previously untreated patients with TNBC [36]. Loi et al. (2017) proved in their study that stTILs can be used as a predictive biomarker since high levels of stTILs are associated with a good response after Pembrolizumab immunotherapy (a humanized antibody which blocks PD-1 located on lymphocytes), and it is associated with an improvement of the objective response rate [36]. We also found not only that high stTILs level are associated with a better DMFS but also that there is a statistically significant association between TILs level and PD-L1 immunoexpression. In the study of Tomioka et al. (2018), it was noticed that low stTILs and high PD-L1 immunoexpression cases are characterized by the poorest DFS and OS, and it was suggested that immunotherapy should be more effective for these category of patients [32]. For these reasons, it is better both biomarkers to be evaluated and to be used together in prediction of ICIs therapy. Not only presence of stTILs is important but also its composition. The microenvironment of a tumor is complex and different types of inflammatory cells are part of it, playing specific role in the progression of the malignant cells. A special attention had been paid to interactions between cytotoxic T cells – CD8 positive (CD8+), regulatory T cells – CD4 positive (CD4+), and regulatory forkhead box protein P3 (FOXP3) T-cells positivity. In the systematic review and meta-analysis of Gao et al. (2020), it is shown that both high stTILs level and specific immunophenotype of stTILs (CD8+, CD4+ and FOXP4+) have an important prognostic value, with improvement of DFS or OS [38]. In our study, we investigated the role CD8+ TILs and its possible association with PD-L1 immunoexpression. The results proved a statistically significant association between them, consistent with other studies [38,39,40]. In addition, we also noted an improvement of DMFS when there is a positive immunoexpression of CD8+ TILs, confirming the importance of using CD8 as a biomarker in the stratification of patients suitable for immunotherapy. The tumor protein p53 (TP53) gene plays an important role in carcinogenesis and its mutation is identified in almost 80% of TNBC cases [22, 41]. There have been identified two types of TP53 mutations, which leads to an aberrant p53 protein immunoexpression: those which are involving the protein-encoding reading frame and have as result an absence of p53 protein immunoexpression (“null-type” mutations), and “missense” mutations with an “overexpression” for p53 protein [42]. Consistent with data from literature, we also demonstrated that an aberrant p53 immunoexpression has a prognostic value since its presence is associated with a worse DMFS. The mutant p53 protein acquired more functions than the “wild-type” p53 protein (normal immunoexpression) and can trigger the immune system by expressing itself on the tumor cell surface through histocompatibility complex (neoantigen) [22, 43,44]. It was also demonstrated that mutation of TP53 gene can lead to a poor reaction of CD8+ T-cells, which can affect the response to the immunotherapy [45]. In our cohort, we identified six cases with overexpression of p53, 85.7% of them being also positive for CD8 TILs, in concordance with the study of Lee et al. (2019), which demonstrated that “missense” mutations of TP53 gene can trigger a highly immunological response different from the “null-type” mutations of TP53 in TNBC. So, even TNBC are frequently associated with a good immunological response, still these patients can be further stratified by stTILs and p53 immunoexpression because these potential biomarkers can predict a better response to adjuvant therapy. Study of Lee et al. (2019) on 798 of TNBC cases highlighted the importance to identify those cases with aberrant p53 immunoexpression because it can also predict a good response to immunotherapy [44], and novel therapy targeting this pathway of carcinogenesis may developed [46].

⧉ Conclusions

The present research analyzes the association between PD-L1 immunoexpression with multiple clinico-morphological features of TNBC, with the presence of stTILs and its composition, and with p53 immunoexpression. Our results bring new insights of the fine connections between tumor microenvironment and molecular changes and help us to better understand these highly aggressive tumors to identify the more useful biomarkers for predicting the response to adjuvant therapy. Testing both PD-L1 status and other factors which are correlated with PD-L1 immunoexpression can represent a method for selecting the most suitable patients for the treatment with ICIs, as monotherapy or in combination with other drugs. Our results can represent a solid base for further researches on larger group, to be able to establish the best biomarkers with predictive and prognostic role, and may lead to the outlining of a diagnostic and treatment protocol.

Conflict of interest

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Informed consent

The experiments were performed with prior informed consent (written) from each participant.
  40 in total

1.  Tailoring therapies--improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015.

Authors:  A S Coates; E P Winer; A Goldhirsch; R D Gelber; M Gnant; M Piccart-Gebhart; B Thürlimann; H-J Senn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 2.  Checkpoint inhibitors in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): Where to go from here.

Authors:  Maryann J Kwa; Sylvia Adams
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications.

Authors:  T Sørlie; C M Perou; R Tibshirani; T Aas; S Geisler; H Johnsen; T Hastie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; T Thorsen; H Quist; J C Matese; P O Brown; D Botstein; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and prognosis in different subtypes of breast cancer: a pooled analysis of 3771 patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Carsten Denkert; Gunter von Minckwitz; Silvia Darb-Esfahani; Bianca Lederer; Barbara I Heppner; Karsten E Weber; Jan Budczies; Jens Huober; Frederick Klauschen; Jenny Furlanetto; Wolfgang D Schmitt; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Thomas Karn; Berit M Pfitzner; Sherko Kümmel; Knut Engels; Andreas Schneeweiss; Arndt Hartmann; Aurelia Noske; Peter A Fasching; Christian Jackisch; Marion van Mackelenbergh; Peter Sinn; Christian Schem; Claus Hanusch; Michael Untch; Sibylle Loibl
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are a powerful prognostic marker in patients with triple-negative breast cancer enrolled in the IBCSG phase III randomized clinical trial 22-00.

Authors:  Giancarlo Pruneri; Kathryn P Gray; Andrea Vingiani; Giuseppe Viale; Giuseppe Curigliano; Carmen Criscitiello; István Láng; Thomas Ruhstaller; Lorenzo Gianni; Aron Goldhirsch; Roswitha Kammler; Karen N Price; Giuseppe Cancello; Elisabetta Munzone; Richard D Gelber; Meredith M Regan; Marco Colleoni
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-07-02       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Prognostic Role and Clinical Association of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte, Programmed Death Ligand-1 Expression with Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in Locally Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jieun Lee; Dong-Min Kim; Ahwon Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 4.679

7.  Association between p53 Expression and Amount of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Miseon Lee; In Ah Park; Sun-Hee Heo; Young-Ae Kim; Gyungyub Gong; Hee Jin Lee
Journal:  J Pathol Transl Med       Date:  2019-03-11

8.  Expression of PD-1/PD-L1 in primary breast tumours and metastatic axillary lymph nodes and its correlation with clinicopathological parameters.

Authors:  Chenxi Yuan; Zhaoyun Liu; Qian Yu; Xinzhao Wang; Mengxue Bian; Zhiyong Yu; Jinming Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guoxuan Gao; Zihan Wang; Xiang Qu; Zhongtao Zhang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Role of TP53 mutations in triple negative and HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Silvia Darb-Esfahani; Carsten Denkert; Albrecht Stenzinger; Christoph Salat; Bruno Sinn; Christian Schem; Volker Endris; Peter Klare; Wolfgang Schmitt; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Wilko Weichert; Markus Möbs; Hans Tesch; Sherko Kümmel; Peter Sinn; Christian Jackisch; Manfred Dietel; Toralf Reimer; Sherene Loi; Michael Untch; Gunter von Minckwitz; Valentina Nekljudova; Sibylle Loibl
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-10-18
View more
  1 in total

1.  A Rare Case of Plasmablastic Lymphoma in a Patient with HIV and SARS-CoV-2 Infections.

Authors:  Adriana Teodora Campeanu; Elena Dumea; Mihaela Rus; Claudia Fodor; Anita Cristina Ionescu; Elena Mocanu; Mihaela Botnarciuc; Irina Magdalena Dumitru
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.677

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.