Literature DB >> 34609278

Neural excitability and sensory input determine intensity perception with opposing directions in initial cortical responses.

Tilman Stephani1,2, Alice Hodapp1, Mina Jamshidi Idaji1,2,3, Arno Villringer1,4,5, Vadim V Nikulin1,6.   

Abstract

Perception of sensory information is determined by stimulus features (e.g., intensity) and instantaneous neural states (e.g., excitability). Commonly, it is assumed that both are reflected similarly in evoked brain potentials, that is, larger amplitudes are associated with a stronger percept of a stimulus. We tested this assumption in a somatosensory discrimination task in humans, simultaneously assessing (i) single-trial excitatory post-synaptic currents inferred from short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), (ii) pre-stimulus alpha oscillations (8-13 Hz), and (iii) peripheral nerve measures. Fluctuations of neural excitability shaped the perceived stimulus intensity already during the very first cortical response (at ~20 ms) yet demonstrating opposite neural signatures as compared to the effect of presented stimulus intensity. We reconcile this discrepancy via a common framework based on the modulation of electro-chemical membrane gradients linking neural states and responses, which calls for reconsidering conventional interpretations of brain potential magnitudes in stimulus intensity encoding.
© 2021, Stephani et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; alpha; excitability; human; intensity perception; neuroscience; oscillations; somatosensory

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34609278      PMCID: PMC8492057          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.67838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.140


  50 in total

1.  Recurrent neural processing and somatosensory awareness.

Authors:  Ryszard Auksztulewicz; Bernhard Spitzer; Felix Blankenburg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Functional localization of brain sources using EEG and/or MEG data: volume conductor and source models.

Authors:  Fernando Lopes da Silva
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Voltage dependence of excitatory postsynaptic potentials of rat neocortical neurons.

Authors:  R A Deisz; G Fortin; W Zieglgänsberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Distinction between added-energy and phase-resetting mechanisms in non-invasively detected somatosensory evoked responses.

Authors:  T Fedele; H-J Scheer; M Burghoff; G Waterstraat; V V Nikulin; G Curio
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2013

5.  The phase of ongoing EEG oscillations predicts visual perception.

Authors:  Niko A Busch; Julien Dubois; Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Dynamics of ongoing activity: explanation of the large variability in evoked cortical responses.

Authors:  A Arieli; A Sterkin; A Grinvald; A Aertsen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Spontaneous Brain Oscillations and Perceptual Decision-Making.

Authors:  Jason Samaha; Luca Iemi; Saskia Haegens; Niko A Busch
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Prestimulus alpha-band power biases visual discrimination confidence, but not accuracy.

Authors:  Jason Samaha; Luca Iemi; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2017-02-17

9.  Neural excitability and sensory input determine intensity perception with opposing directions in initial cortical responses.

Authors:  Tilman Stephani; Alice Hodapp; Mina Jamshidi Idaji; Arno Villringer; Vadim V Nikulin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Brainstorm: a user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis.

Authors:  François Tadel; Sylvain Baillet; John C Mosher; Dimitrios Pantazis; Richard M Leahy
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-13
View more
  2 in total

1.  Respiration, Heartbeat, and Conscious Tactile Perception.

Authors:  Martin Grund; Esra Al; Marc Pabst; Alice Dabbagh; Tilman Stephani; Till Nierhaus; Michael Gaebler; Arno Villringer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 6.709

2.  Neural excitability and sensory input determine intensity perception with opposing directions in initial cortical responses.

Authors:  Tilman Stephani; Alice Hodapp; Mina Jamshidi Idaji; Arno Villringer; Vadim V Nikulin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 8.140

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.