Literature DB >> 3460926

Gastric protection by sucralfate. Role of mucus and prostaglandins.

T Shea-Donohue, L Steel, E Montcalm, A Dubois.   

Abstract

Sucralfate promotes the healing of peptic ulcers and, in large doses, increases gastric mucosal prostaglandins. The present study was designed to further elucidate the protective effect of sucralfate and to evaluate the role of prostaglandins in this action. Eight chair-adapted rhesus monkeys received a subcutaneous injection of either 150 mg/kg of aspirin or vehicle in combination with either a therapeutic oral dose of sucralfate (50 mg/kg X day) or water. Gastric soluble mucus concentration was determined in samples of gastric juice by Alcian blue dye binding of acidic glycoproteins, and mucus output was determined using a technetium 99m-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid dilution technique. Monkeys underwent endoscopy to assess gastric mucosal damage, which was ranked blindly on a scale of 0-5, and to obtain biopsy specimens for determination of mucosal prostaglandin E2, prostaglandin F2 alpha, and 6-keto-prostaglandin F1 alpha. Aspirin did not alter soluble mucus but did significantly increase gastric mucosal damage and suppress tissue levels of all prostaglandins. Sucralfate significantly increased the output of soluble mucus, even after aspirin treatment, and protected against aspirin-induced damage, although it did not modify aspirin-induced suppression of prostaglandins. These results suggest that the gastric protection afforded by sucralfate is related to a prostaglandin-independent increase in mucus production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3460926     DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(86)90636-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  14 in total

1.  Sialic acid: ambiguous marker of pepsin-degraded mucus.

Authors:  M Guslandi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Effect of bismuth subcitrate and sucralfate on rat duodenal and human gastric bicarbonate secretion in vivo.

Authors:  C J Shorrock; A Garner; A H Hunter; J R Crampton; W D Rees
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Effect of sucralfate and its components on taurocholate-induced damage to rat gastric mucosal cells in tissue culture.

Authors:  M Romano; M Razandi; K J Ivey
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Sucralfate and methylprednisolone enemas in active ulcerative colitis: a prospective, single-blind study.

Authors:  J P Wright; T A Winter; S Candy; I S Marks
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Effect of intragastric pH on mucosal protective action of sucralfate.

Authors:  J Z Danesh; A Duncan; R I Russell; G Mitchell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Effect of long-term sucralfate ingestion on antral and fundic epithelial proliferation in the rat.

Authors:  H Kuwayama
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Evaluation of putative cytoprotective properties of antiulcer drugs using quantitative histological techniques.

Authors:  P E O'Brien; G Frydman; R Holmes; C Malcontenti; D Phelan
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Stimulation of amphibian gastroduodenal bicarbonate secretion by sucralfate and aluminium: role of local prostaglandin metabolism.

Authors:  J R Crampton; L C Gibbons; W D Rees
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Utilization of a human intestinal epithelial cell culture system (Caco-2) for evaluating cytoprotective agents.

Authors:  A S Tang; P J Chikhale; P K Shah; R T Borchardt
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  Stimulation of prostaglandin biosynthesis mediates gastroprotective effect of rebamipide in rats.

Authors:  A Kleine; S Kluge; B M Peskar
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.