Literature DB >> 8290475

Utilization of a human intestinal epithelial cell culture system (Caco-2) for evaluating cytoprotective agents.

A S Tang1, P J Chikhale, P K Shah, R T Borchardt.   

Abstract

Human intestinal epithelial cells (Caco-2) were cultured as confluent monolayers on polycarbonate membranes in Transwells for investigating their applicability in evaluating the cytoprotective activity of sucralfate. The control experiments established a reproducible chemical method (using 0.5 mM indomethacin in Hanks' balanced salt solution) for inducing damage to the Caco-2 cell monolayers. Damage was determined by measuring changes in transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER). Twenty-day-old Caco-2 cell monolayers were significantly and reproducibly damaged (compared to buffer alone) (P < 0.001) by application of 0.5 mM indomethacin to the apical side for 1 hr. While sucralfate, at a 0.5, 2, or 5 mg/mL concentration in the buffer, was shown not to reverse (treat) the damage caused by indomethacin in this cellular model, it was able to protect (prevent) the cells from indomethacin-induced damage (P < 0.001). We observed that indomethacin-induced damage to the Caco-2 cell monolayers greatly affected the paracellular pathway since the percentage transport of [3H]methoxyinulin was significantly elevated. In contrast, protection of the Caco-2 cells with 5 mg/mL sucralfate in the presence of the damaging agent resulted in transport of the paracellular marker similar to that in the control (HBSS-treated) cell monolayers. This direct cytoprotective effect was thus independent of vascular factors at neutral pH and was observed to be dose dependent (0.5 to 5 mg/mL) when sucralfate was applied to the cells in the presence of the damaging agent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8290475     DOI: 10.1023/a:1018976804403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  26 in total

1.  Role of vascular factors, including angiogenesis, in the mechanisms of action of sucralfate.

Authors:  S Szabo; P Vattay; E Scarbrough; J Folkman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1991-08-08       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Effect of sucralfate and its components on taurocholate-induced damage to rat gastric mucosal cells in tissue culture.

Authors:  M Romano; M Razandi; K J Ivey
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Sucralfate.

Authors:  B F McGraw; E G Caldwell
Journal:  Drug Intell Clin Pharm       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug

4.  Mechanism of L-alpha-methyldopa transport through a monolayer of polarized human intestinal epithelial cells (Caco-2).

Authors:  M Hu; R T Borchardt
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  The influence of peptide structure on transport across Caco-2 cells. II. Peptide bond modification which results in improved permeability.

Authors:  R A Conradi; A R Hilgers; N F Ho; P S Burton
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Endoscopic evaluation of the effect of sucralfate therapy and other clinical parameters on the recurrence rate of gastric ulcers.

Authors:  T Miyake; J Ariyoshi; T Suzaki; M Oishi; M Sakai; S Ueda
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Effects of an antiulcer drug, sucralfate (a basic aluminum salt of sulfated disaccharide), on experimental gastric lesions and gastric secretion in rats.

Authors:  S Okabe; K Takeuchi; H Kunimi; M Kanno; M Kawashima
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Reduction by cytoprotective agents of ethanol-induced damage to the rat gastric mucosa: a correlated morphological and physiological study.

Authors:  J L Wallace; G P Morris; E J Krausse; S E Greaves
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.273

9.  Efficacy of sucralfate for duodenal ulcers: a multicenter, double-blind trial.

Authors:  D Hollander
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.062

10.  Does sucralfate affect the normal gastric mucosa? Histologic, ultrastructural, and functional assessment in the rat.

Authors:  A Tarnawski; D Hollander; W J Krause; R D Zipser; J Stachura; H Gergely
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  3 in total

1.  Bioprinted 3D Primary Human Intestinal Tissues Model Aspects of Native Physiology and ADME/Tox Functions.

Authors:  Lauran R Madden; Theresa V Nguyen; Salvador Garcia-Mojica; Vishal Shah; Alex V Le; Andrea Peier; Richard Visconti; Eric M Parker; Sharon C Presnell; Deborah G Nguyen; Kelsey N Retting
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2018-03-27

2.  Imaging modification of colon carcinoma cells exposed to lipid based nanovectors for drug delivery: a scanning electron microscopy investigation.

Authors:  Nicoletta Depalo; Elisabetta Fanizza; Fabio Vischio; Nunzio Denora; Valentino Laquintana; Annalisa Cutrignelli; Marinella Striccoli; Gianluigi Giannelli; Angela Agostiano; Maria Lucia Curri; Maria Principia Scavo
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.036

3.  Feasibility of Using Seaweed (Gracilaria coronopifolia) Synbiotic as a Bioactive Material for Intestinal Health.

Authors:  Po-Hsien Li; Wen-Chien Lu; Yung-Jia Chan; Yu-Ping Zhao; Xiao-Bao Nie; Chang-Xing Jiang; Yu-Xiang Ji
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2019-11-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.