Literature DB >> 34606759

Adaptive Measurement of Change: A Novel Method to Reduce Respondent Burden and Detect Significant Individual-Level Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

David J Weiss1, Chun Wang2, Andrea L Cheville3, Jeffrey R Basford3, Joseph DeWeese4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the adaptive measurement of change (AMC) as a means to identify psychometrically significant change in reported function of hospitalized patients and to reduce respondent burden on follow-up assessments.
DESIGN: The AMC method uses multivariate computerized adaptive testing (CAT) and psychometric hypothesis tests based in item response theory to more efficiently measure intra-individual change using the responses of a single patient over 2 or more testing occasions. Illustrations of the utility of AMC in clinical care and estimates of AMC-based item reduction are provided using the Functional Assessment in Acute Care Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Test (FAMCAT), a newly developed functional multidimensional CAT-based measurement of basic mobility, daily activities, and applied cognition.
SETTING: Two quaternary hospitals in the Upper Midwest. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred ninety-five hospitalized patients who completed the FAMCAT on 2 to 4 occasions during their hospital stay. INTERVENTION: N/A.
RESULTS: Of the 495 patients who completed more than 1 FAMCAT, 72% completed 2 sessions, 13% completed 3, and 15% completed 4, with 22.1%, 23.4%, and 23.0%, respectively, exhibiting significant multivariate change. Use of the AMC in conjunction with the FAMCAT reduced respondent burden from that of the FAMCAT alone for follow-up assessments. On average, when used without the AMC, 22.7 items (range, 20.4-24.4) were administered during FAMCAT sessions. Post hoc analyses determined that when the AMC was used with the FAMCAT a mean±standard deviation reduction in FAMCAT number of items of 13.6 (11.1), 13.1 (9.8), and 18.1 (10.8) would occur during the second, third, and fourth sessions, respectively, which corresponded to a reduction in test duration of 3.0 (2.4), 3.0 (2.8), and 4.7 (2.6) minutes. Analysis showed that the AMC requires no assumptions about the nature of change and provides data that are potentially actionable for patient care. Various patterns of significant univariate and multivariate change are illustrated.
CONCLUSIONS: The AMC method is an effective and parsimonious approach to identifying significant change in patients' measured CAT scores. The AMC approach reduced FAMCAT sessions by an average of 12.6 items (55%) and 2.9 minutes (53%) among patients with psychometrically significant score changes.
Copyright © 2021 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FAMCAT; Item response theory; Measurement of individual change; Multidimensional computerized adaptive testing; Patient-reported outcomes; Rehabilitation; Respondent burden

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34606759      PMCID: PMC8971145          DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.07.814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   4.060


  18 in total

Review 1.  Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Dennis Revicki; Ron D Hays; David Cella; Jeff Sloan
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Hypothesis Testing Methods for Multivariate Multi-Occasion Intra-Individual Change.

Authors:  Chun Wang; David J Weiss; King Yiu Suen
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Perceived Burden of Completion of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials:: Results of a Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Serge Bodart; Bill Byrom; Mabel Crescioni; Sonya Eremenco; Emuella Flood
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 1.778

4.  Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Potential Path Toward the Efficient and Precise Assessment of Applied Cognition, Daily Activity, and Mobility for Hospitalized Patients.

Authors:  Chun Wang; David J Weiss; Shiyang Su; King Yiu Suen; Jeffrey Basford; Andrea L Cheville
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  Patient-reported outcomes: instrument development and selection issues.

Authors:  Ralph R Turner; Alexandra L Quittner; Bhash M Parasuraman; Joel D Kallich; Charles S Cleeland
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.725

6.  Performance of an item response theory-based computer adaptive test in identifying functional decline.

Authors:  Andrea L Cheville; Kathleen J Yost; Dirk R Larson; Katiuska Dos Santos; Megan M O'Byrne; Megan T Chang; Terry M Therneau; Felix E Diehn; Ping Yang
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare.

Authors:  Nick Black
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-01-28

Review 8.  Follow-up by mail in clinical trials: does questionnaire length matter?

Authors:  Phil Edwards; Ian Roberts; Peter Sandercock; Chris Frost
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2004-02

9.  Depression Outcomes in Smokers and Nonsmokers: Comparison of Collaborative Care Management Versus Usual Care.

Authors:  Joseph A Akambase; Nathaniel E Miller; Gregory M Garrison; Paul Stadem; Heather Talley; Kurt B Angstman
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec

Review 10.  A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting.

Authors:  Jack Chen; Lixin Ou; Stephanie J Hollis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  4 in total

1.  Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Potential Path Toward the Efficient and Precise Assessment of Applied Cognition, Daily Activity, and Mobility for Hospitalized Patients.

Authors:  Chun Wang; David J Weiss; Shiyang Su; King Yiu Suen; Jeffrey Basford; Andrea L Cheville
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Correlation and Crosswalks Between Patient-Reported Functional Outcomes and PROMIS Physical Function Among Medically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Elizabeth Marfeo; Pengsheng Ni; Chun Wang; David Weiss; Andrea L Cheville
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Responsiveness and interpretation of the PROMIS Cancer Function Brief 3D Profile.

Authors:  Sean R Smith; Mary Vargo; David S Zucker; Samman Shahpar; Lynn H Gerber; Maryanne Henderson; Gina Jay; Andrea L Cheville
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 6.921

Review 4.  Key considerations to reduce or address respondent burden in patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection.

Authors:  Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi; Jessica Roydhouse; Samantha Cruz Rivera; Paul Kamudoni; Peter Schache; Roger Wilson; Richard Stephens; Melanie Calvert
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 17.694

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.