Literature DB >> 10210074

Isokinetic evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: hamstring versus patellar tendon.

T R Carter1, S Edinger.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare the hamstring and quadriceps isokinetic results 6 months postoperatively in patients having patellar tendon or hamstring anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The study group was comprised of 106 randomly selected patients who had ACL reconstruction with either autogenous patellar tendon (PT), semitendinosus (ST), or semitendinosus and gracilis (ST/G). Hamstring and quadriceps isokinetic strength were assessed at 180 degrees/sec and 300 degrees/sec with the results of the operatively treated leg expressed as a percent compared with the nonoperative leg. The mean results for knee extension at 180 degrees/sec were 68.3%, 74.3%, and 78.1%; and at 300 degrees/sec were 70.7%, 76.7%, and 81.7% for PT, ST, and ST/G, respectively. The mean results for knee flexion at 180 degrees/sec were 86.1%, 80.6%, and 81.7%; and at 300 degrees/sec were 77.6%, 79.1%, and 75.6% for PT, ST, and ST/G, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in regard to knee extension or flexion strength when evaluating the different tissue sources. The results show that selection of autogenous hamstring or PT used for ACL reconstruction should not be based solely on the assumption of the tissue source altering the recovery of quadriceps and/or hamstring strength. In addition, a majority of the patients had not achieved adequate strength to safely partake in unlimited activities at 6 months postoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10210074     DOI: 10.1053/ar.1999.v15.0150161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  37 in total

1.  Current concepts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a criterion-based rehabilitation progression.

Authors:  Douglas Adams; David S Logerstedt; Airelle Hunter-Giordano; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.751

2.  Optimal screw diameter for interference fixation in a bone tunnel: a porcine model.

Authors:  M W J Morris; J L Williams; A J Thake; Y Lang; J N Brown
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Ability of a new hop test to determine functional deficits after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jesper Augustsson; Roland Thomeé; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-05-08       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Muscle strength and hop performance criteria prior to return to sports after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Roland Thomeé; Yonatan Kaplan; Joanna Kvist; Grethe Myklebust; May Arna Risberg; Daniel Theisen; Elias Tsepis; Suzanne Werner; Barbara Wondrasch; Erik Witvrouw
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Comparison of clinical outcomes and second-look arthroscopic findings after ACL reconstruction using a hamstring autograft or a tibialis allograft.

Authors:  Seung-Hyun Yoo; Eun-Kyoo Song; Young-Rok Shin; Sung-Kyu Kim; Jong-Keun Seon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts versus hamstring autografts for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis.

Authors:  David J Biau; Caroline Tournoux; Sandrine Katsahian; Peter J Schranz; Rémy S Nizard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-04-07

Review 7.  Hamstring tendons regeneration after ACL reconstruction: an overview.

Authors:  Vassilios S Nikolaou; Nicolas Efstathopoulos; Torsten Wredmark
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Development of a strength test battery for evaluating leg muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction.

Authors:  Camille Neeter; Alexander Gustavsson; Pia Thomeé; Jesper Augustsson; Roland Thomeé; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Four-strand hamstring tendon autograft versus LARS artificial ligament for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Zhong-tang Liu; Xian-long Zhang; Yao Jiang; Bing-Fang Zeng
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Differences in the rehabilitation period following two methods of anterior cruciate ligament replacement: semitendinosus/gracilis tendon vs. ligamentum patellae.

Authors:  Tim Rose; Thomas Engel; Joachim Bernhard; Pierre Hepp; Christoph Josten; Helmut Lill
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.