Literature DB >> 34603617

Influence of the adhesive strategy in the sealing ability of resin composite inlays after deep margin elevation.

Dayana Da Silva1, Laura Ceballos2, María-Victoria Fuentes3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the influence of the gingival margin position and the adhesive strategy selected to perform deep margin elevation (DME) in marginal sealing of resin composite inlays by a nanoleakage test.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 12 sound third molars were selected and expulsive MOD cavities for inlays were prepared. Experimental groups were established according to gingival margin location (enamel: 1 mm above cemento-enamel junction (CEJ), dentin: 1 mm below CEJ, or DME, and the adhesive strategy used to lute inlays and elevate the gingival margin. Therefore, the six experimental groups were: 1) Enamel + etch-and-rinse adhesive (ERA) Adper Scotchbond 1XT (SB1XT); 2) Dentin + SB1XT; 3) DME + SB1XT; 4) Enamel + self-etching adhesive (SEA) with enamel selective etching Clearfil SE Bond (CSE); 5) Dentin + CSE; 6) DME + CSE. Resin composite inlays were constructed (Gradia Indirect) and all luted with the same resin cement (RelyX ARC). Specimens were submitted to nanoleakage test. Results were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests with Bonferroni correction (p<0.05).
RESULTS: A perfect sealing ability was evidenced for experimental groups with gingival margins on enamel. Similar nanoleakage values were determined when CSE adhesive was applied regardless the gingival margin position. The highest silver nitrate infiltration was detected for elevated margins with the ERA SB1XT.
CONCLUSIONS: The SEA Clearfil SE Bond showed higher sealing ability than the ERA Adper Scotchbond 1XT when margins were located on dentin, regardless margin elevation. Gingival margins on enamel together with enamel acid etching provided an excellent sealing with both adhesive systems. Key words:Adhesion, composite inlays, gingival margin, deep margin elevation, marginal seal, nanoleakage test. Copyright:
© 2021 Medicina Oral S.L.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34603617      PMCID: PMC8464384          DOI: 10.4317/jced.58689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent        ISSN: 1989-5488


  37 in total

Review 1.  Have dentin adhesives become too hydrophilic?

Authors:  Franklin R Tay; David H Pashley
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.316

2.  Effects of a peripheral enamel margin on the long-term bond strength and nanoleakage of composite/dentin interfaces produced by self-adhesive and conventional resin cements.

Authors:  Alline C Kasaz; Carlos E Pena; Rodrigo S de Alexandre; Ronaldo G Viotti; Veronica B Santana; Cesar A G Arrais; Marcelo Giannini; Andre F Reis
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  Adhesion of indirect MOD resin composite inlays luted with self-adhesive and self-etching resin cements.

Authors:  T Inukai; T Abe; Y Ito; P Pilecki; R F Wilson; T F Watson; R M Foxton
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 2.440

Review 4.  Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials.

Authors:  M Peumans; P Kanumilli; J De Munck; K Van Landuyt; P Lambrechts; B Van Meerbeek
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  Influence of resin composite shade and location of the gingival margin on the microleakage of posterior restorations.

Authors:  Fabiano de Oliveira Araujo; Luiz Clovis Cardoso Vieira; Sylvio Monteiro Junior
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.440

6.  Evaluation of the In Vitro Effects of Cervical Marginal Relocation Using Composite Resins on the Marginal Quality of CAD/CAM Crowns.

Authors:  Roberto Spreafico; Giulio Marchesi; Gianluca Turco; Andrea Frassetto; Roberto Di Lenarda; Annalisa Mazzoni; Milena Cadenaro; Lorenzo Breschi
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Influence of cervical margin relocation (CMR) on periodontal health: 12-month results of a controlled trial.

Authors:  Marco Ferrari; Serhat Koken; Simone Grandini; Edoardo Ferrari Cagidiaco; Tim Joda; Nicola Discepoli
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Evaluation of dentin hardness and bond strength at different walls of class II preparations.

Authors:  Andrea Nóbrega Cavalcanti; Fabio Hiroyuki Mitsui; Adriano Fonseca de Lima; Paula Mathias; Giselle Maria Marchi
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching.

Authors:  M Peumans; J De Munck; K L Van Landuyt; A Poitevin; P Lambrechts; B Van Meerbeek
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 5.304

10.  Micropermeability of current self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesives bonded to deep dentine: a comparison study using a double-staining/confocal microscopy technique.

Authors:  Salvatore Sauro; David H Pashley; Francesco Mannocci; Franklin R Tay; Peter Pilecki; Martyn Sherriff; Timothy F Watson
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.612

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Deep Margin Elevation: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Theodora Kalliopi Samartzi; Dimokritos Papalexopoulos; Panagiotis Ntovas; Christos Rahiotis; Markus B Blatz
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-14
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.