Literature DB >> 34602837

BIOVERA-Tree: tree diversity, community composition, forest structure and functional traits along gradients of forest-use intensity and elevation in Veracruz, Mexico.

María Leticia Monge González1, Patrick Weigelt1, Nathaly Guerrero-Ramírez1, Dylan Craven2, Gonzalo Castillo-Campos3, Thorsten Krömer4, Holger Kreft1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Here, we describe BIOVERA-Tree, a database on tree diversity, community composition, forest structure and functional traits collected in 120 forest plots, distributed along an extensive elevational gradient in Veracruz State, Mexico. BIOVERA-Tree includes information on forest structure from three levels of forest-use intensity, namely old-growth, degraded and secondary forest, replicated across eight elevations from sea-level to near the tree line at 3500 m and on size and location of 4549 tree individuals with a diameter at breast height ≥ 5 cm belonging to 216 species, 154 genera and 80 families. We also report measurements of eight functional traits, namely wood density for 143 species, maximum height for 216 species and leaf traits including: specific leaf area, lamina density, leaf thickness, chlorophyll content and leaf area for 148 species and leaf dry matter content for 145 species. NEW INFORMATION: BIOVERA-Tree is a new database comprising data collected in a rigorous sampling design along forest-use intensity and elevational gradients, contributing to our understanding of how interactive effects of forest-use intensity and elevation affect tree diversity, community composition and functional traits in tropical forests. María Leticia Monge González, Patrick Weigelt, Nathaly Guerrero-Ramírez, Dylan Craven, Gonzalo Castillo-Campos, Thorsten Krömer, Holger Kreft.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34602837      PMCID: PMC8445910          DOI: 10.3897/BDJ.9.e69560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biodivers Data J        ISSN: 1314-2828


Introduction

Mountains are fascinating ecosystems and natural laboratories for evolutionary and ecological research as they encompass a wide variety of different climatic conditions over short distances (Körner 2004, Malhi et al. 2010). Mountains have captivated and inspired scientists since the seminal research by Alexander von Humboldt (von Humboldt 1806) and mountain research still contributes to our understanding of how environmental conditions affect plant distributions and how diversity may be impacted by global change (McCain and Grytnes 2010, Körner 2004, Malhi et al. 2010,Morueta-Holme et al. 2016). Mountains cover 25% of the Earth’s land surface and support an estimated one third of all terrestrial species (Körner 2004). Tropical mountains account for 10% of the terrestrial land area and are reservoirs of species diversity and hotspots of endemism with the potential to provide safe havens for species under current and predicted future anthropogenic global warming (Körner 2004, Sundqvist et al. 2013, Perrigo et al. 2020). Finally, tropical mountain forests provide a plethora of important ecosystem functions, for example, water storage and yield, carbon storage and pollination, that underpin ecosystem services and are a basis for human well-being (Díaz et al. 2018). Yet increasing human population and land-use intensification are altering forest structure, tree species diversity and functional diversity of tropical mountain forests around the world. Land-use change and intensification are occurring at rapid rates and are strongly impacting mountain ecosystems (Payne et al. 2017). For instance, during a period of high deforestation in Mexico between 1980 and 2010, the State of Veracruz experienced the second highest rate of deforestation amongst all states, with 75% of its area being deforested (Ellis et al. 2011, Secretaría del Medio ambiente y recursos naturales 2016). Specifically between 1990 and 2000, Veracruz lost approximately 4.8% of its natural and secondary vegetation during this period, while only 8.6% of its vegetation remains conserved (Ellis et al. 2011). Afterwards, however, the region experienced a mild recovery in forest cover between 2000 and 2014 (Gómez-Díaz et al. 2018). Land-use change and intensification for timber extraction, agriculture and cattle pastures alter tree species diversity and community composition in this region (Monge‐González et al. 2020). Further, land-use change is not only a major threat to species diversity, but also has consequences for ecosystem functioning (Chapin et al. 2000, Newbold et al. 2015, Hooper et al. 2005). Therefore, high-quality databases of tree diversity and ecosystem functions are essential to understand the impacts of land-use change and elevation on tropical forests. Here, our objective is to contribute to the knowledge on how elevation and forest-use intensity interactively affect tropical tree diversity, community composition, functional traits and forest structure.

General description

Purpose

BIOVERA-Tree originated from the interdisciplinary research project BIOVERA, which aims at documenting and understanding biodiversity patterns along gradients of altitude, climate, soil and disturbance along an elevational transect at the Cofre de Perote in central Veracruz, Mexico (Carvajal‐Hernández et al. 2017, Gómez-Díaz et al. 2017, Bautista-Bello et al. 2019, Guzmán‐Jacob et al. 2020, Monge‐González et al. 2020). BIOVERA-Tree comprises forest plot data from eight elevational sites and three levels of forest-use intensity, namely old-growth, degraded and secondary forests. It contains descriptions of 120 non-permanent forests plots of 20 × 20 m and a community matrix including abundances for 216 species. Further, it contains measurements for 216 species including diameter at breast height (DBH) > 5 cm and tree height (metres) of 4548 and 4549 individuals, respectively. BIOVERA-Tree also includes functional traits for the common tree species, with data for wood density of 143 species calculated, based on 483 individuals, maximun height for 216 species calculated, based on 4549 individuals and leaf traits for 148 species, specific leaf area (n = 3148 leaves), lamina density (n = 3194 leaves), chlorophyll content (n = 3280 leaves), leaf area (n = 3214 leaves), leaf thickness (n = 3299) and leaf dry matter content for 145 species (n = 3081 leaves).

Project description

Study area description

The study area is located along an elevational gradient from sea level close to the Gulf of Mexico to near the tree line at 3545 m on the eastern slopes of the Cofre de Perote volcano, in the central part of the State of Veracruz, Mexico (Fig. 1). This region is located at the intersection of the Trans-Mexican volcanic belt and the Sierra Madre Oriental, resulting in complex geological conditions and is a transition zone where floristic elements from the Neotropics and Nearctic mix. Veracruz (including the study area) is part of the Mesoamerican biodiversity hotspot (Myers et al. 2000). The State harbours a diverse vascular flora of approximately 8500 species, which represents about 36% of the Mexican flora (Villaseñor 2016). The elevational gradient is characterised by a wide range of different environmental conditions. For instance, climate varies between tropical-dry at lower elevations, to temperate-humid at mid-elevations and cold-dry at high elevations (Soto-Esparza and Giddings-Berger 2011). The mean annual temperature ranges from 26°C near sea level to 9°C at the highest site. Mean annual precipitation varies between 1222 mm at low elevations, 2952 mm at mid-elevations and 708 mm at high elevations (Servicio Meteorológico Nacional 2019). Six main vegetation types along this elevation gradient are typically recognised, including tropical semi-humid deciduous, tropical oak, humid montane, pine-oak, pine and fir forests (Leopold 1950, Carvajal-Hernández et al. 2020). However, land-use change has altered these ecosystems into mostly degraded and secondary forests. The forests in the lowlands (0, 500 and 1000 m) have been largely replaced by agricultural systems, for example, sugar cane, corn, mango and lemon plantations and grasslands for cattle (Travieso-Bello et al. 2006, Thiébaut et al. 2017), while the forests at mid-elevations (1500, 2000 and 2500 m) have been transformed by illegal logging for charcoal production and firewood and converted into cattle pastures, coffee plantations and agricultural fields (Cruz-Angón et al. 2010) and the forests in the highlands (3000 and 3500 m) have been altered by timber extraction, agricultural fields for potatoes and broad beans, as well as pastures for goats and sheep (Pineda-López et al. 2013). Land-use modifications at every elevational site change with the primary economic activities.
Figure 1.

Location of the eight study sites along the elevational gradient at the eastern slopes of Cofre de Perote in Veracruz, Mexico. Black dots show the location of sites along the elevational gradient 1) 0 m; 2) 500 m; 3) 1000 m; 4) 1500 m; 5) 2000 m; 6) 2500 m; 7) 3000 m; 8) 3500 m.

Sampling methods

Sampling description

We selected eight sites along the elevational gradient, separated by about 500 m in elevation (Fig. 1). At each site, we established 15 plots of 20 × 20 m, with five plots located in old-growth, degraded and secondary forests, respectively (Suppl. material 1). This study design led to a total of 120 non-permanent forest plots (120 × 0.04 ha = 4.8 ha) inventoried along the elevation gradient. Old-growth forests were defined as mature forests with low forest-use intensity and showed no signs of recent human use. Degraded forests were classified as intermediate forest-use intensity which had been subjected to selective logging and grazing by cattle or goats at high elevations. Finally, secondary forests were defined as high forest-use intensity, having regenerated following clear-cutting 15-20 years prior or with cattle grazing (Gómez-Díaz et al. 2017). In each plot, we inventoried all trees with a DBH > 5 cm and identified individual trees to the highest taxonomic resolution possible. For each individual, we measured its DBH (in cm) and tree height (in m), which was measured with a Leica laser (Homeier et al. 2010, Monge‐González et al. 2020). We calculated maximum tree height for each species following King et al. (2006) and classified the trees into three groups: 1) species with more than 20 individuals, 2) species with between 5-19 individuals and 3) species with less than five individuals. For the first group, we calculated maximum tree height as the mean of the tallest three individuals. For the second group, we estimated maximum tree height as the mean of the tallest two individuals; and for the third group, we used the height of the tallest individual (King et al. 2006). In addition, we collected functional traits for the common tree species and we measured the following functional traits: maximum height, wood density, specific leaf area, leaf dry matter content, lamina density, leaf thickness, chlorophyll content and leaf area (Table 1). We selected these traits because they were expected to respond to both elevation and forest-use intensity (Díaz et al. 2016). For instance, the abundance of species with slow growth and conservative resource acquisition was expected to decrease, while that of species with fast growth and acquisition rates should increase with forest-use intensity (Table 1) (Lavorel and Garnier 2002, Díaz et al. 2016). For trait measurements, we selected one to three tree individuals per species and collected at least five to ten leaves per individual and one to three wood cores per species along the gradients of elevation and forest-use intensity.
Table 1.

Number of individuals and species with measurements of eight functional traits.

Ecological relevance Functional Trait Unit Measured individuals Number of species
Seed dispersion, competitive abilityMaximum heightm4549216
Structure and mechanical supportWood densityg cm-3483143
Leaf energy and water balance, physical strengthSpecific leaf aream2 kg-13148148
Leaf dry matter contentg g-13081145
Leaf thicknessmm3299148
Lamina densityg cm-33194148
PhotosynthesisLeaf areacm23214148
Chlorophyll contentμg cm−23280148
For wood density, we collected wood samples using an increment borer. We used the water-displacement method for measuring wood sample volume and oven-dried samples at 70°C for 48 to 72 hours until they reached a constant dry weight (Chave 2005). We determined maximum height for each species following King et al. (2006). For leaf traits, we followed standardised trait measurement protocols (Pérez-Harguindeguy et al. 2016). We weighed the fresh leaves and then oven-dried them at 60°C for 48 hours or until they had reached a constant dry weight. We measured leaf thickness with a digital caliper. For chlorophyll concentration, we used a SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter (Spectrum Technologies, Plainfield, IL, USA) and converted measurements to chlorophyll concentration following (Coste et al. 2010). We calculated leaf area using WinFOLIA (Version 2016b Pro, Regent Instruments Canada, 2016). In total, we collected wood samples for 143 species and leaf samples for 148 species, except leaf dry matter content, for which we have samples for 145 species. We followed the definition and categories according to Darwin Core, Functional Diversity thesaurus (Suppl. material 6).

Geographic coverage

Description

The BIOVERA elevational gradient is located close to the Gulf of Mexico and spans from close to sea level (19.5894N, -96.375167W) to close to the treeline at 3545 m elevation (19.5182N, -97.154525W) along the eastern slopes of Cofre de Perote volcano (4282 m) in Veracruz State, Mexico (Fig. 1).

Taxonomic coverage

Taxonomic information on valid species, genus and family names was obtained from The Plant List version 1.1 (2013). Individuals were identified to the species level by specialists (Dr. Francisco Lorea-Hernández, M.Sc. Claudia Gallardo-Hernández and Biol. Carlos M. Durán-Espinosa, Instituto de Ecología, A. C.), while some individuals could only be identified to the family or genus level or could not be identified. Vouchers of specimens were deposited at the Herbarium XAL of Instituto de Ecología, A.C. at Xalapa, Mexico. Tree diversity and community composition The database contains information of 216 tree species (Suppl. material 2) distributed amongst 80 families and 154 genera and tree abundances across plots along the forest-use intensity and elevation gradients (Suppl. material 3, Suppl. material 4). We recorded a total of 4,549 individual trees, we identified 4136 individuals to species, 307 individuals were identified to genus, 57 individuals were identified to family and 49 individual trees were not identified. The number of species per plot ranged from 1 to 18, with a mean 8.1 species (Table 2).
Table 2.

Mean tree species and individual numbers per plot.

Elevation (m) Species(mean ± SD)Individuals(mean ± SD)
06.8 ± 4.1617.46 ± 8.68
50011.06 ± 3.6336.4 ± 11.91
100013.33 ± 2.2235.4 ± 12.7
15009.6 ± 4.5644.73 ± 15.9
200013.13 ± 2.9444.13 ± 10.4
25006.8 ± 2.9942.20 ± 13.2
30003.06 ± 0.9628.93 ± 10.5
35001.66 ± 0.7251.4 ± 30.81
The number of individuals per plot ranged from 4 to 120 with a mean of 8.19 individuals (Table 2). Species-abundance distributions across levels of forest-use intensity indicated a higher proportion of rare species in old-growth and degraded forests than in secondary forests (Fig. 2A). Species-abundance distributions across elevations revealed that forests at high elevations (3000-3500 m) are dominated by a small number of species, while forests at low elevations (0-1000 m) and mid-elevations (1500-2000 m) exhibited higher evenness (Fig. 2B).
Figure 2.

Species-abundance distributions (n = 120 plots) using an empirical cumulative distribution function A for different levels of forest-use intensity and B for eight sites along the elevation gradient. Vertical axis shows each species from most to least abundant. Horizontal axis shows the relative abundance of the species on a logarithmic scale. Forest-use intensity levels are old-growth forest (OF), degraded forest (DF) and secondary forest (SF).

Forest structure Across all plots, DBH ranged from 5 to 148 cm, with a mean of 14 ± 15.5 SD (Fig. 3). DBH mean per forest-use intensity varied from 20.84 ± 17.6 SD in old-growth forests, 19.3 ± 15.2 SD in degraded forests and 17.4 ± 13.3 SD in secondary forests. The four species with the highest mean DBH were , , and .
Figure 3.

Diameter at breast height (DBH; n = 4127 individuals) for A different levels of forest-use intensity and for B eight sites along the elevation gradient. Vertical axis shows tree diameter at breast height (DBH) on a logarithmic scale. Forest-use intensity levels are old-growth forest (OF), degraded forest (DF) and secondary forest (SF). Boxes are second and third quartile, whiskers upper and lower quartile and horizontal lines indicate mean values.

Traits coverage

Tree functional traits This dataset contains eight functional traits (Table 1, Fig. 4). The number of species per functional trait varies, from 216 species for maximum height, to 143 for wood density and 143- 148 species for leaf traits.
Figure 4.

Distribution of eight functional traits along elevation and forest-use intensity gradients in the BIOVERA-Tree. Points represent leaf-level data for specific leaf area (n = 3148), leaf dry matter content (n = 3081), lamina density (n= 3194), leaf area (n = 3214), leaf thickness (n = 3299), and chlorophyll content (n = 3280); individual-level data for wood density (n = 483); and species-level data for maximum height (n = 216). Boxes are second and third quartile, whiskers upper and lower quartile and horizontal lines indicate mean values.

Usage licence

Usage licence

Creative Commons Public Domain Waiver (CC-Zero)

Data resources

Data package title

Data package title BIOVERA-Tree: community, functional traits and forest structure along forest-use intensity and elevational gradients in Veracruz, Mexico.

Number of data sets

6

Data set 1.

Data set name

BIOVERA-Tree forest plots description

Number of columns

13

Description

Location of the 120 plots along the elevational gradient at the eastern slopes of Cofre de Perote in Veracruz, Mexico. Available as Suppl. material 1.

Data set 2.

BIOVERA-Tree scientific name 3 List of tree species along the elevational gradient and different levels of forest-use intensity. Available as Suppl. material 2.

Data set 3.

BIOVERA-Tree community matrix 2 Tree community matrix composition along eight elevational sites and three different forest-use intensity levels of 216 tree species (n = 5 plots per forest-use intensity within elevation). The numbers within the matrix are the number of individuals. Available as Suppl. material 3.

Data set 4.

BIOVERA-Tree forest structure 5 Diameter at breast height (DBH) > 5 cm and tree height (metres) for 216 species along the elevational gradient and different levels of forest-use intensity. Available as Suppl. material 4.

Data set 5.

BIOVERA-Tree functional traits 7 Plant functional traits measured along the elevational gradient and different levels of forest-use intensity; including leaf traits, wood density and maximum height. Available as Suppl. material 5 .

Data set 6.

BIOVERA Tree metadata 3

Character set

metadata Definition and categories according with Darwin Core, Functional Diversity thesaurus and this research.

Additional information

The data underpinning the analysis reported in this paper are deposited in the Dryad Data Repository at https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.ngf1vhhvb. BIOVERA-Tree forest plots description Location Data File: oo_549009.csv BIOVERA-Tree scientific name Taxonomy File: oo_549044.csv BIOVERA-Tree community matrix Species community data Tree community matrix with abundances File: oo_549021.csv BIOVERA-Tree forest structure Forest structure, DBH, tree height File: oo_549014.csv BIOVERA-Tree functional traits Functional trait data File: oo_549015.csv BIOVERA-Tree metadata metadata Definition and categories according with Darwin Core, Functional Diversity thesaurus and this research. File: oo_549022.csv
Data set 1.
Column labelColumn description
locationIDAn identifier for the set of location information (data associated with dcterms:Location). May be a global unique identifier or an identifier specific to the dataset.
roundElevationround metres above sea level
verbatimElevationThe original description of the elevation (altitude, usually above sea level) of the Location.
habitatA category or description of the habitat in which the Event occurred.
forestUseIntensityOld growth forest (OF) a mature forest with low forest-use intensity, degraded forest (DF) classified as intermediate forest-use intensity and secondary forest (SF) high forest-use intensity
verbatimLatitudeThe verbatim original latitude of the Location. The coordinate ellipsoid, geodeticDatum or full Spatial Reference System (SRS) for these coordinates should be stored in verbatimSRS and the coordinate system should be stored in verbatimCoordinateSystem.
verbatimLongitudeThe verbatim original longitude of the Location. The coordinate ellipsoid, geodeticDatum or full Spatial Reference System (SRS) for these coordinates should be stored in verbatimSRS and the coordinate system should be stored in verbatimCoordinateSystem.
temperatureMean annual temperature (in degrees Celsius)
precipitationMean annual precipitation (in millimetres)
countryThe name of the country or major administrative unit in which the Location occurs.
eventDateThe date or interval during which an Event occurred. For occurrences, this is the date when the event was recorded.
coordinateUncertaintyInMetresThe horizontal distance (in metres) from the given decimalLatitude and decimalLongitude describing the smallest circle containing the whole of the Location.
geodeticDatumThe ellipsoid, geodetic datum or spatial reference system (SRS) upon which the geographic coordinates given in decimalLatitude and decimalLongitude are based. Here: WGS84
Data set 2.
Column labelColumn description
treeIdentificationIDAn identifier for the nomenclatural (not taxonomic) details of a scientific name.
treeIdentificationThe full scientific name, with authorship and date information, if known. When forming part of an Identification, this should be the name in lowest level taxonomic rank that can be determined.
familyThe full scientific name of the family in which the taxon is classified
Data set 3.
Column labelColumn description
locationIDForest plot identifier from supplementary table 1 (rows)
treeIdentificationIDScientific name identifier from supplementary table 1 (columns)
Data set 4.
Column labelColumn description
locationIDAn identifier for the set of location information (data associated with dcterms:Location). May be a global unique identifier or an identifier specific to the dataset.
treeIdentificationIDAn identifier for the nomenclatural (not taxonomic) details of a scientific name.
organismIDAn identifier for the Organism instance (as opposed to a particular digital record of the Organism). May be a globally unique identifier or an identifier specific to the dataset.
variableNamename of the variable
variableValuevalue
Data set 5.
Column labelColumn description
treeIdentificationIDAn identifier for the nomenclatural (not taxonomic) details of a scientific name.
organismIDAn identifier for the Organism instance (as opposed to a particular digital record of the Organism). May be a globally unique identifier or an identifier specific to the dataset.
leafIDAn identifier for leaf
heightGroupIt is the classification of trees into three groups: 1) species with more than 20 individuals, 2) species with between 5-19 individuals and 3) species with less than five individuals.
resolutionScale
traitNameFunctional trait
traitValueFunctional trait value
Data set 6.
Column labelColumn description
AccordingType of terminological resource for plant characteristics.
ConceptTerm, name of the variable
DefinitionExplanation of concepts and variables
  7 in total

1.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities.

Authors:  N Myers; R A Mittermeier; C G Mittermeier; G A da Fonseca; J Kent
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The global spectrum of plant form and function.

Authors:  Sandra Díaz; Jens Kattge; Johannes H C Cornelissen; Ian J Wright; Sandra Lavorel; Stéphane Dray; Björn Reu; Michael Kleyer; Christian Wirth; I Colin Prentice; Eric Garnier; Gerhard Bönisch; Mark Westoby; Hendrik Poorter; Peter B Reich; Angela T Moles; John Dickie; Andrew N Gillison; Amy E Zanne; Jérôme Chave; S Joseph Wright; Serge N Sheremet'ev; Hervé Jactel; Christopher Baraloto; Bruno Cerabolini; Simon Pierce; Bill Shipley; Donald Kirkup; Fernando Casanoves; Julia S Joswig; Angela Günther; Valeria Falczuk; Nadja Rüger; Miguel D Mahecha; Lucas D Gorné
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Reply to Sklenář: Upward vegetation shifts on Chimborazo are robust.

Authors:  Naia Morueta-Holme; Kristine Engemann; Pablo Sandoval-Acuña; Jeremy D Jonas; R Max Segnitz; Jens-Christian Svenning
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Mountain biodiversity, its causes and function.

Authors:  Christian Körner
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.129

Review 5.  Consequences of changing biodiversity.

Authors:  F S Chapin; E S Zavaleta; V T Eviner; R L Naylor; P M Vitousek; H L Reynolds; D U Hooper; S Lavorel; O E Sala; S E Hobbie; M C Mack; S Díaz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-05-11       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity.

Authors:  Tim Newbold; Lawrence N Hudson; Samantha L L Hill; Sara Contu; Igor Lysenko; Rebecca A Senior; Luca Börger; Dominic J Bennett; Argyrios Choimes; Ben Collen; Julie Day; Adriana De Palma; Sandra Díaz; Susy Echeverria-Londoño; Melanie J Edgar; Anat Feldman; Morgan Garon; Michelle L K Harrison; Tamera Alhusseini; Daniel J Ingram; Yuval Itescu; Jens Kattge; Victoria Kemp; Lucinda Kirkpatrick; Michael Kleyer; David Laginha Pinto Correia; Callum D Martin; Shai Meiri; Maria Novosolov; Yuan Pan; Helen R P Phillips; Drew W Purves; Alexandra Robinson; Jake Simpson; Sean L Tuck; Evan Weiher; Hannah J White; Robert M Ewers; Georgina M Mace; Jörn P W Scharlemann; Andy Purvis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Assessing nature's contributions to people.

Authors:  Sandra Díaz; Unai Pascual; Marie Stenseke; Berta Martín-López; Robert T Watson; Zsolt Molnár; Rosemary Hill; Kai M A Chan; Ivar A Baste; Kate A Brauman; Stephen Polasky; Andrew Church; Mark Lonsdale; Anne Larigauderie; Paul W Leadley; Alexander P E van Oudenhoven; Felice van der Plaat; Matthias Schröter; Sandra Lavorel; Yildiz Aumeeruddy-Thomas; Elena Bukvareva; Kirsten Davies; Sebsebe Demissew; Gunay Erpul; Pierre Failler; Carlos A Guerra; Chad L Hewitt; Hans Keune; Sarah Lindley; Yoshihisa Shirayama
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 47.728

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Global patterns of vascular plant alpha diversity.

Authors:  Francesco Maria Sabatini; Borja Jiménez-Alfaro; Ute Jandt; Milan Chytrý; Richard Field; Michael Kessler; Jonathan Lenoir; Franziska Schrodt; Susan K Wiser; Mohammed A S Arfin Khan; Fabio Attorre; Luis Cayuela; Michele De Sanctis; Jürgen Dengler; Sylvia Haider; Mohamed Z Hatim; Adrian Indreica; Florian Jansen; Aníbal Pauchard; Robert K Peet; Petr Petřík; Valério D Pillar; Brody Sandel; Marco Schmidt; Zhiyao Tang; Peter van Bodegom; Kiril Vassilev; Cyrille Violle; Esteban Alvarez-Davila; Priya Davidar; Jiri Dolezal; Bruno Hérault; Antonio Galán-de-Mera; Jorge Jiménez; Stephan Kambach; Sebastian Kepfer-Rojas; Holger Kreft; Felipe Lezama; Reynaldo Linares-Palomino; Abel Monteagudo Mendoza; Justin K N'Dja; Oliver L Phillips; Gonzalo Rivas-Torres; Petr Sklenář; Karina Speziale; Ben J Strohbach; Rodolfo Vásquez Martínez; Hua-Feng Wang; Karsten Wesche; Helge Bruelheide
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 17.694

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.