| Literature DB >> 34602799 |
Shu Zhao1, Ying Yao2, Nan Ya3.
Abstract
Mobile social media are increasingly being used in education. They provide an effective way to address the imbalance between teaching supply and demand for older adults. However, few studies have investigated which factors contribute to older adults' intention to use mobile social media for learning. This study uses a sequential explanatory mixed method to investigate the factors impacting older Chinese adults' adoption of mobile social media for learning. Results of the quantitative phase indicated that Technology Anxiety (TA), Self-efficacy (SE), Previous Experience (PE), and Subjective Norm (SN) had significant effects on Perceived Usefulness (PU). TA, SE, PE, and Facilitating Conditions (FC) had significant effects on Perceived Ease of Use (PEU). PU and PEU are significant predictors of Behavioral Intention (BI), and PEU had a positive effect on PU. In the qualitative study, the significant effects of these extension factors on PU and/or PEU were investigated further. Perceptions and concerns about using mobile social media for learning were analyzed based on the participants' interview data. On the basis of these results, recommendations are made to promote the use of mobile social media for learning by older adults. Specifically, teachers and colleges should: (a) select appropriate social media applications and set up relevant courses, and (b) supply inexpensive network service and high-quality learning support service. These research results have important implications for academic researchers, senior college managers, and teachers. © Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2021.Entities:
Keywords: Mobile learning; Mobile social media; Older adult education; Technology acceptance model
Year: 2021 PMID: 34602799 PMCID: PMC8475833 DOI: 10.1007/s11423-021-10048-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Educ Technol Res Dev ISSN: 1042-1629
Fig. 1The extended TAM
Measurement items of constructs
| Construct | Measurement Items | Adapted from |
|---|---|---|
| TA | TA1: Using mobile social media (WeChat, QQ, TikTok, etc.) for learning makes me very nervous TA2: Using social media (WeChat, QQ, TikTok, etc.) for learning makes me worried TA3: Using social media (WeChat, QQ, TikTok, etc.) for learning makes me feel uncomfortable | Deng et al. ( |
| SE | SE1: I could use mobile social media (WeChat, QQ, TikTok, etc.) for learning if there was no one around to tell me what to do as I go SE2: I could use mobile social media (WeChat, QQ, TikTok, etc.) for learning if I could call someone for help if I got stuck SE3: I could use mobile social media (WeChat, QQ, TikTok, etc.) for learning if someone showed me how to do it first | Compeau and Higgin ( |
| PE | (Experience in using social media for learning, such as watching videos; scanning and sharing information; uploading homework; asking questions and getting answers) PE1: I have lots of experience in using the above-mentioned services for learning PE2: I believe that these previous experiences were quite useful for me PE3: I can verify that these previous experiences were quite positive | Ryu et al. ( |
| SN | SN1: People who influence my behavior would think that I should use the system SN2: People who are important to me would think that I should use the system SN3: In general, the senior citizen college has supported the use of mobile social media for learning | Venkatesh and Bala ( |
| FC | FC1: Guidance was available to me in the process of using mobile social media for learning FC2: A specific person (or group) is available for assistance with the process of using mobile social media for learning FC3: The necessary device and network are available to me in the process of using mobile social media for learning FC4: The cost of using mobile social media for learning is affordable | Venkatesh et al. ( |
| PU | PU1: Using mobile social media (WeChat, QQ, TikTok, etc.) for learning is convenient PU2: Using mobile social media (WeChat, QQ, TikTok, etc.) for learning is efficient PU3: I find using mobile social media (WeChat, QQ, TikTok, etc.) for learning to be useful | Davis ( |
| PEU | PEU1: I can use the mobile social media (WeChat, QQ, TikTok, etc.) for learning easily PEU2: Learning to use the mobile social media (WeChat, QQ, TikTok, etc.) is easy for me PEU3: I find it easy to use mobile social media (WeChat, QQ, TikTok, etc.) to do what I want | Davis ( |
| BI | BI1: I intend to use mobile social media (WeChat, QQ, TikTok, etc.) for learning BI2: I predict that I would use mobile social media (WeChat, QQ, TikTok, etc.) for learning BI3: I plan to use the mobile social media (WeChat, QQ, TikTok, etc.) for learning in the near future | Venkatesh and Bala ( |
Demographics of respondents (N = 391)
| Category | Frequency | Percent (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Age | ||
| 50–54 years old | 105 | 26.9 |
| 55–59 years old | 225 | 57.5 |
| 60–64 years old | 54 | 13.8 |
| Over 64 years old | 7 | 1.8 |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 73 | 18.7 |
| Female | 318 | 81.3 |
| Education level | ||
| Elementary school and below | 23 | 5.9 |
| Middle school education | 273 | 69.8 |
| Bachelor’s degree | 92 | 23.5 |
| Master’s degree | 3 | 0.8 |
| Past experience of using mobile social media applications | ||
| Less than one year | 54 | 13.8 |
| One to two years | 151 | 38.6 |
| Two to three years | 92 | 23.5 |
| More than three years | 94 | 24.0 |
Reliability and convergent validity
| Constructs | Items | Cronbach’s alpha | Factor loadings | CR | AVE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA | TA1 | 0.77 | 0.87 | 0.77 | 0.54 |
| TA2 | 0.66 | ||||
| TA3 | 0.65 | ||||
| SE | SE1 | 0.85 | 0.74 | 0.86 | 0.67 |
| SE2 | 0.73 | ||||
| SE3 | 0.97 | ||||
| PE | PE1 | 0.83 | 0.72 | 0.85 | 0.66 |
| PE2 | 0.99 | ||||
| PE3 | 0.69 | ||||
| SN | SN1 | 0.88 | 0.78 | 0.88 | 0.72 |
| SN2 | 0.80 | ||||
| SN3 | 0.95 | ||||
| FC | FC1 | 0.87 | 0.72 | 0.88 | 0.64 |
| FC2 | 0.74 | ||||
| FC3 | 0.99 | ||||
| FC4 | 0.73 | ||||
| PU | PU1 | 0.83 | 0.70 | 0.83 | 0.63 |
| PU2 | 0.73 | ||||
| PU3 | 0.93 | ||||
| PEU | PEU1 | 0.85 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 0.67 |
| PEU2 | 0.73 | ||||
| PEU3 | 0.74 | ||||
| BI | BI1 | 0.82 | 0.96 | 0.84 | 0.63 |
| BI2 | 0.68 | ||||
| BI3 | 0.72 |
Correlation matrix and discriminant validity
| FC | SE | SN | TA | PE | PEU | PU | BI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FC | 0.800 | |||||||
| SE | 0.431 | 0.819 | ||||||
| SN | 0.548 | 0.469 | 0.849 | |||||
| TA | − 0.441 | − 0.411 | − 0.553 | 0.735 | ||||
| PE | 0.416 | 0.424 | 0.434 | − 0.289 | 0.812 | |||
| PEU | 0.442 | 0.464 | 0.419 | − 0.420 | 0.434 | 0.819 | ||
| PU | 0.464 | 0.521 | 0.513 | − 0.456 | 0.435 | 0.470 | 0.794 | |
| BI | 0.269 | 0.293 | 0.277 | − 0.260 | 0.258 | 0.432 | 0.440 | 0.794 |
Model fit indices
| Fit indices | Value | Level of acceptable fit | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| X2/df | 1.105 | < 3 (Kline, | Good |
| CFI | 0.995 | > 0.9 (Kline, | Good |
| GFI | 0.948 | > 0.9 (Kline, | Good |
| AGFI | 0.933 | > 0.9 (Kline, | Good |
| RMSEA | 0.016 | < 0.08 (Byrne, | Good |
CFI Comparative fit index, GFI Goodness of fit index, AGFI Adjusted goodness of fit index, RMSEA Root mean square error of approximation
Hypothesized relationships
| Casual path | Standardized coefficients | Supported | |
|---|---|---|---|
| H3a: PU⟵TA | − 0.131 | .037 | Yes |
| H3b: PEU⟵TA | − 0.178 | .006 | Yes |
| H4a: PU⟵SE | 0.228 | < .001 | Yes |
| H4b: PEU⟵SE | 0.214 | < .001 | Yes |
| H5a: PU⟵PE | 0.125 | .017 | Yes |
| H5b: PEU⟵PE | 0.206 | < .001 | Yes |
| H6a: PU⟵SN | 0.162 | .011 | Yes |
| H6b: PEU⟵SN | 0.042 | .514 | No |
| H7a: PU⟵FC | 0.105 | .060 | No |
| H7b: PEU⟵FC | 0.162 | .005 | Yes |
| H1: BI⟵PU | 0.304 | < .001 | Yes |
| H2a: BI⟵PEU | 0.289 | < .001 | Yes |
| H2b: PU⟵PEU | 0.140 | .013 | Yes |
Five constructs frequency counts
| Constructs | fparticipant | fcode |
|---|---|---|
| TA | ||
| + | 1 | 2 |
| − | 12 | 27 |
| SE | ||
| + | 7 | 11 |
| − | 2 | 2 |
| PE | ||
| + | 9 | 11 |
| − | 2 | 3 |
| SN | ||
| + | 10 | 17 |
| − | 2 | 4 |
| FC | ||
| + | 13 | 34 |
| − | 1 | 2 |
Details and example quotes of each construct
| Constructs | Descriptions | Example quotes |
|---|---|---|
| TA | To some degree, TA is determined by familiarity with an application. Most participants show low TA toward the applications they are familiar with, but high TA toward new applications. They are afraid and unconfident about mastering a new learning application | “I have used WeChat for two years. I am familiar with using it. I do not feel anxiety if using WeChat for learning. In fact, we use it frequently. I have many WeChat groups, like family member groups and senior citizen college groups. In my class group, we always share learning materials. I can get notifications in time. Our teachers or class monitors use it to post notifications. Our teachers use it during teaching, too. After each calligraphy class, our teacher sent us the writing video and a picture of his work. We can review the video after school.” (Sun, age 53) |
| SE | Participants demonstrated low SE for using a new application when learning by themselves, but high SE to master an application when learning with help | “I think I can grasp the application for learning very well with someone’s help. My son helped me to register a TikTok account and taught me how to use it. Now, I manage it by myself. I learned many methods of cooking from this software. I record many Tai Chi videos and upload them to my TikTok accounts. Now I have about three hundred fans.” (Bai, age 56) |
| PE | Participants reported that their PE mainly comes from their careers before retirement. They explained that PE could alleviate their anxiety and increase their self-confidence to learn something new. They thought PE could help them to get a better understanding of the values of social media and to learn to use social media more easily | “I was an accountant before I retired. I used IT to deal with everything. This [experience] made me know that using a mobile phone for learning is convenient and effective. As I can use a complex computer and system, I can easily learn to use mobile social media for learning.” (Wang, age 53) |
| SN | Most participants’ behaviors in using technology for learning have largely been influenced by social peers instead of their family members. The one-child policy in China has replaced many traditional big families with nuclear families. Senior citizens have more time for social activities. The elderly students can easily receive encouragement and help from the people around them | “I have been using WeChat for three or four years. At first, it was used by other members of our elder dance team. They always chatted and posted activity notifications via WeChat. I don’t want to miss these group activities. They encouraged me and taught me how to use it.” (Wang, age 53) |
| FC | Most students cared about affordable pricing and learning support services. Several elderly students were sensitive and cautious about cost. Senior citizens’ lower pension levels and past hard life experiences when they were young are critical factors that could explain their cautious behavior. Their requirements for FC are focused on learning support services | “Frankly, I do care how much it costs to study through the mobile phone. My pension is not very high. I just want to spend only a little money on learning. If the cost exceeds my expectations, I will give up.” (Liu, age 57) |
Frequency counts of preferences for social media
| Mobile social media | fparticipant | fcode |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | 42 | |
| Toutiao | 13 | 25 |
| TikTok | 11 | 14 |
| 7 | 9 |
Popular social media applications and their potential use in education
| Types of social media | Name of application | Possible learning activities |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-purpose messaging applications | WeChat, QQ | Creating class-based groups; communicating with teachers or peers; watching live lectures or pre-recorded lectures; sharing homework assignments; organizing discussions; receiving notifications; etc |
| Short-form mobile video applications | TikTok, Kwai | Creating class-based groups; presenting, sharing, and commenting on a series of videos; etc |
| News applications | Toutiao, Tencent | Following topics and news sources related to the course; collecting together articles to share with peers; organizing news with tags; etc |
| Microblog applications | Creating a class blog for discussions; posting class updates; sharing school events; etc |
Fig. 2WeChat official account of China Open University for the Aged (in Chinese)
Fig. 3WeChat mini-application of China Open University for the Aged (in Chinese)