| Literature DB >> 34602010 |
Jiangju Huang1,2, Zhihao Zhang1, Benquan Liu1, Ying Gao1, Jiayi Nie1, Shihong Wen3, Xiaohong Lai1, Hua Liang1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Advancing renal fibrosis is the common histopathological feature of chronic obstructive nephropathy, representing the final pathway of nearly all chronic and progressive nephropathies. Increasing evidences suggest that circular RNAs (circRNAs) are crucial regulatory molecules present at virtually every level of the cellular pathophysiological process. Nonetheless, there are a few evidences for the role of circRNAs in renal fibrosis induced by obstructive nephropathy. AIMS: We performed RNA-seq analysis to analyze the expression profiles of circRNAs in the obstructed kidneys to identify the potential circRNAs and their network.Entities:
Keywords: Renal fibrosis; UUO; bioinformatics analysis; ceRNA; circRNAs
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34602010 PMCID: PMC8491726 DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2021.1979040
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ren Fail ISSN: 0886-022X Impact factor: 2.606
Figure 1.Flowchart of this study.
Figure 2.UUO model was conducted successfully. (A) H&E staining for kidneys of UUO mice or control mice. (B) Sirius red staining for kidneys of UUO mice or control mice. (C) Quantitative assessment of renal injury in the kidneys of UUO mice or control mice. (D) Quantitative assessment of collagen areas in the kidneys of UUO mice or control mice. (E) Representative photomicrographs of kidney sections stained for Fibronectin (green) and counterstained with DAPI (blue). (F) Quantitative analysis of the fibronectin-positive area in the kidneys. (G) Representative photomicrographs of kidney sections stained for collagen I (green) and counterstained with DAPI (blue). (H) Quantitative analysis of collagen I-positive area in the kidneys. (I) Representative photomicrographs of kidney sections stained for α smooth muscle actin (α-SMA; red) and counterstained with DAPI (blue). (J) Quantitative analysis of the α-SMA-positive area in the kidneys. **p < 0.01 versus control. n = 3 in each group. Scale bar: 50μm.
Figure 3.The circRNAs in mouse kidney. (A) Heat map generated by hierarchical clustering of differentially expressed circRNAs in UUO and control samples, red representing high read counts of circRNAs and blue for low expressed circRNAs. (B) The volcano plot shows the total change circRNAs in each group, left shows those down-regulated and right for up-regulated circRNAs. (C) Among detected circRNAs, 5454 and 2935 circRNAs were detected in the control and UUO group, respectively, and 13284 circRNAs were detected in both groups. (D) The TPM distributions of circRNAs. (E) The distribution of the sequence length of circRNAs. (F) The distribution of circRNAs host genes in all chromosomes, most are form exon.
Figure 4.The features of those DEcircRNAs. (A and B) The results of GO and KEGG pathway analysis for upregulated circRNAs. (C and D) The results of GO and KEGG pathway analysis for downregulated circRNAs.
Figure 5.The CeRNA network for the top 10 DEcircRNAs. (A) The ceRNA module network of the top 5 up and downregulated circRNAs; red spots represented circRNAs, blue for miRNAs, green for genes. The high-light red circles were the main ones to present those circRNAs that have been provided to be important in fibrosis renal progress. (B) Gene ontology (GO) analysis of dysregulated mRNAs in the triple network. (C) KEGG pathway shows the top 20 enrichment terms of biological processes.