| Literature DB >> 30965656 |
Elena Martínez-Klimova1, Omar Emiliano Aparicio-Trejo2, Edilia Tapia3, José Pedraza-Chaverri4.
Abstract
Renal fibrosis is the common pathway for most forms of progressive renal disease. The Unilateral Ureteral Obstruction (UUO) model is used to cause renal fibrosis, where the primary feature of UUO is tubular injury as a result of obstructed urine flow. Furthermore, experimental UUO in rodents is believed to mimic human chronic obstructive nephropathy in an accelerated manner. Renal fibrosis is the common pathway for most forms of progressive renal disease. Removing the obstruction may not be sufficient to reverse fibrosis, so an accompanying treatment may be of benefit. In this review, we have done a revision on treatments shown to ameliorate fibrosis in the context of the UUO experimental model. The treatments inhibit the production of fibrotic and inflammatory proteins such as Transforming Growth Factor β1 (TGF-β₁), Tumor Necrosis Factor α (TNF-α), collagen and fibronectin, Heat Shock Protein 47 (HSP47), suppress the proliferation of fibroblasts, prevent epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, reduce oxidative stress, inhibit the action of the Nuclear Factor κB (NF-κB), reduce the phosphorylation of mothers against decapentaplegic homolog (SMAD) family members 2 and 3 (Smad2/3) or Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases (MAPKs), inhibit the activation of the renin-angiotensin system. Summaries of the UUO experimental methods and alterations observed in the UUO experiments are included.Entities:
Keywords: UUO; fibrosis; fibrosis-attenuating treatment; unilateral ureteral obstruction
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30965656 PMCID: PMC6523883 DOI: 10.3390/biom9040141
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Summary of technical details of UUO experiments discussed in this review.
| Experimental Animal | Treatment Supplementation | Anesthesia | Ureter Ligation | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male Sprague-Dawley rats | Drinking water | Isoflurane | Left, 5-0 silk | [ |
| Male Sprague-Dawley rats | Drinking water | Sodium pentobarbital | Left, triple ligation, 4-0 silk, | [ |
| Male Sprague-Dawley rats | Intraperitoneal injection | 10% Chloral hydrate | Right, 5-0 silk, ligation in two places and cut between, penicillin | [ |
| Male Sprague-Dawley rats | Intraperitoneal injection | Mixture of isoflurane and oxygen, pentobarbital | Left, double ligation, 4-0 silk, cut | [ |
| Male Sprague-Dawley rats | Gavage in 1% carboxymethylcellulose-Na | Pentobarbital sodium | Left, double ligation, 4-0 silk, cut | [ |
| Male Sprague-Dawley rats | Gavage | Tiletamine/zolazepam | Left, 4-0 silk, ligation at two locations and cut in between | [ |
| Male Sprague-Dawley rats | Gavage in 1% | Pentobarbital sodium | Left, 4-0 silk, triple ligation and cut | [ |
| Male Sprague-Dawley rats | Tube-fed | Pentobarbital | Left, 4-0 silk, ligation in two points and cut in between | [ |
| Male Sprague-Dawley rats | Subcutaneous implanted mini-osmotic pump and intraperitoneal injection | Isoflurane | Left, double ligation, 7-0 silk | [ |
| Male Wistar rats | Intraperitoneal injection | Ketamine/xylazine | Left, 4-0 silk, ligation at two points and cut between | [ |
| Male Wistar rats | Oral administration | Ketamine/chlorpromazine | Left, silk | [ |
| Male Wistar rats | Gavage in 0.5% | Ketamine/xylazine hydrochloride | Left, 3-4 mm long bisected PVC tube of 0.58 mm internal diameter, tube constriction with 4-0 silk (reversed UUO) | [ |
| Male Wistar rats | Gavage | Thiopental | Left, 3-0 silk, double ligation | [ |
| Female nu/nu mice | Intravenous injection through tail vein | Chloral hydrate 10% | Left, ligation of lower third, 4/0 suture | [ |
| Male BALB/cCrSlc mice | Drinking water | Pentobarbital (50 mg/kg) | Left, ligation, 4-0 silk | [ |
| Male BALB/c mice | Gavage | Sodium pentobarbital | Left, double ligation, 4-0 nylon | [ |
| Male C57BL/6 mice | Drinking water | Sevofrane | Left, complete ligation at the ureteropelvic junction, 4-0 silk | [ |
| Male C57BL/6J mice | Intraperitoneal injection | Medetomidine, midazolam, butorphanol | Left, double ligation | [ |
| Male C57BL/6 mice | Intraperitoneal injection | 3.5% Chloral hydrate | Right, double ligation, 6-0 silk | [ |
| Male C57BL/6 mice | Intraperitoneal injection | Pentobarbital sodium | Left, tightening at midportion, 5-0 suture | [ |
| Male C57BL/6 mice | Intraperitoneal injection | Ketamine/xylazine (100/10 mg/kg) | Right, double ligation, 3-0 silk | [ |
| Male C57BL/6 mice | Intraperitoneal injection | 10% Chloral hydrate | NS | [ |
| Male C57BL/6 mice | Gavage | Sodium pentobarbital | Left, 4-0 silk, ligation at two points and cut in between | [ |
| Male C57BL/6 mice | Gavage | Isoflurane/oxygen | 4-0 silk | [ |
| Male and female C57Bl/6 mice | None | Isoflurane | Left, double ligation, 5-0 silk | [ |
| Male ICR mice | Injection into left kidney via ureter | Pentobarbital (75 mg/kg) | Left, complete obstruction, silk | [ |
| Male ICR mice | Intraperitoneal injection | Pentobarbital sodium | Left, double ligation, 4-0 silk | [ |
NS: Not Specified.
Figure 1Summarized events that occur in the Unilateral Ureteral Obstruction-Obstructed Kidney (UUO-OK). The Unilateral Ureteral Obstruction (UUO) procedure typically consists of ligating one ureter with silk thread. Several variations on the technique have been reported and are listed in Table 1.
Antibodies used to detect proteins by immunohistochemistry or Western Blot or gene expression measured by RT-qPCR. Arrows indicate increase or decrease in levels of UUO-OKs compared to Sham-kidneys.
| Marker↓ Technique➝ | Immunohistochemistry | RT-qPCR | Western Blot |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18s rRNA | =[ | ||
| α-SMA | ↑[ | ↑[ | ↑[ |
| α-Tubulin | ↓[ | ||
| α-Tubulin acetylated | ↑[ | ||
| β-Actin | =[ | ||
| β-Catenin | ↑[ | ||
| β-Catenin active | ↑[ | ||
| β-cateninnuclear | ↑[ | ||
| A1AR, A3AR, A2AAR, A2BAR | ↑[ | ||
| ACE | ↓[ | ↑[ | |
| ACE2 | ↓[ | ||
| AGT | ↑[ | ||
| Angiotensin II | ↑[ | ||
| ASC | ↑[ | ↑[ | |
| AQP1, AQP2, AQP3, AQP4 | ↓[ | ↓[ | |
| p-ATM | ↑[ | ||
| AT1R | ↑[ | ↑[ | |
| Bax | ↑[ | ||
| Bcl-2 | ↓[ | ||
| Bim | ↑[ | ||
| BMP-7 | ↓[ | ↓[ | ↓[ |
| Caspase-1 | ↑[ | ↑[ | |
| Caspase-1 cleaved | ↑[ | ||
| pro-Caspase-1 | ↑[ | ||
| Caspase-3 cleaved | ↑[ | ||
| Caspase-8 | ↑[ | ||
| Caspase-9 | ↑[ | ||
| Catalase | ↓[ | ||
| CD3 | ↑[ | ||
| CD34 | ↓[ | ||
| Collagen I | ↑[ | ↑[ | ↑[ |
| Collagen III | ↑[ | ↑[ | ↑[ |
| Collagen IV | ↑[ | ↑[ | ↑[ |
| CTGF | ↑[ | ↑[ | |
| CuSOD | ↓[ | ||
| E-cadherin | ↓[ | ↑[ | ↓[ |
| ED1 (CD68) | ↑[ | ↑[ | |
| ED2 (CD163) | ↑[ | ||
| ED3 (CD169) | ↑[ | ||
| EGFR | ↑[ | ||
| p-EGFR | ↑[ | ||
| ERK1/2 MAPK | ↑[ | ||
| p-ERK1/2-MAPK | ↑[ | ||
| F4/80 | ↑[ | ↑[ | |
| Fibronectin | ↑[ | ↑[ | ↑[ |
| FSP-1 (S100A4) | ↑[ | ↑[ | |
| GAPDH (G3PDH) | =[ | =[ | |
| GLP-1R | ↓[ | ||
| GSTa2 | =[ | ||
| GSTm3 | ↓[ | ||
| HIF-1[α] | ↑[ | ↑[ | |
| Histone H3 | =[ | ||
| Histone H3 acetylated | =[ | ||
| HO-1 | =[ | ↓[ | |
| HSP47 | ↑[ | ↑[ | |
| IκBα | ↓[ | ||
| p-IκBα | ↑[ | ||
| IκKα | ↑[ | ||
| p-IκKα | ↑[ | ||
| ICAM-1 | ↑[ | ↑[ | ↑[ |
| IL-1[β] | ↑[ | ↑[[ | ↑[ |
| Cleaved-IL-1β | ↑[ | ||
| pro-IL-1β | ↑[ | ||
| IL-6 | ↑[ | ||
| IL-17 | ↑[ | ↑[ | |
| IL-18 | ↑[ | ||
| JNK-MAPK | ↑[ | ||
| p-JNK-MAPK | ↑[ | ||
| Keap1 | ↑[ | ||
| Ki-67 | ↑[ | ||
| Klotho | ↓[ | ↓[ | |
| LRP5 LRP6 | ↑[ | ||
| p-LRP5 p-LRP6 | ↑[ | ||
| Lysyl oxidase (LOx) | ↑[ | ||
| MCP-1 | ↑[ | ↑[ | ↑[ |
| MMP2 | ↑[ | ↑[ | |
| MMP7 | ↑[ | ↑[ | |
| MMP9 | ↑[ | ↑[ | |
| MnSOD | ↓[ | ||
| p-MYPT-1 | ↑[ | ||
| NF-κB | ↑[ | ||
| p-NF-κB | ↑[ | ||
| NLRP3 | ↑[ | ↑[ | |
| Nox1, Nox2, Nox4 | ↑[ | ||
| NQO1 | ↓[ | ↓[ | |
| Nrf2cytoplasmic | ↓[ | ||
| Nrf2nuclear | =[ | ||
| OPN | ↑[ | ||
| P16INK4a | ↑[ | ↑[ | ↑[ |
| p22Phox | ↑[ | ||
| p38-MAPK | ↑[ | ||
| p-p38-MAPK | ↑[ | ||
| p53 | ↑[ | ↑[ | |
| p-p53 | ↑[ | ||
| PAI-1 | ↑[ | ↑[ | ↑[ |
| PCNA | ↑[ | ↑[ | ↑[ |
| PPAR-𝝲 | ↑[ | ||
| PRR | ↑[ | ||
| Renin | ↑[ | ↑[ | |
| Renin Receptor | ↑[ | ||
| ROCK1 and ROCK2 | ↑[ | ||
| RIP | ↓[ | ||
| Smad1/5/8 | ↓[ | ||
| Smad2 | ↑[ | ↑[ | |
| p-Smad2 | ↑[ | ||
| Smad3 | ↑[ | ↑[ | |
| p-Smad3 | ↑[ | ||
| Smad2/3 | ↑[ | ↑[ | |
| p-Smad2/3 | ↑[ | ||
| Smad4 | ↑[ | ||
| Smad7 | ↓[ | ||
| Smad8 | ↓[ | ||
| Snail1 | ↑[ | ↑[ | |
| p-Src | ↑[ | ||
| STAT3 | =[ | ||
| p-STAT3 | ↑[ | ||
| TAZ | ↑[ | ↑[ | |
| TIMP-1 | ↑[ | ||
| TGF-β1 | ↑ [ | ↑[ | ↑[ |
| TGF-βRI | ↑[ | ↑[ | ↑[ |
| TGF-βRII | ↓[ | ||
| TLR4 | ↑[ | ||
| TNF-α | ↑[ | ↑[ | ↑[ |
| TNFR1 | =[ | ||
| TNFR2 | ↑[ | ||
| TRAF2 | ↓[ | ||
| Twist | ↑[ | ||
| V2R | ↓[ | ||
| VCAM-1 | ↑[ | ||
| VEGF | ↓[ | ↓[ | |
| Vimentin | ↑[ | ↑[ | |
| Wnt1 | ↓[ | ↑[ | |
| Wnt2 | ↑[ | ||
| Wnt3 | ↑[ | ↑[ | ↑[ |
| Wnt4 | ↑[ | ↑[ | ↑[ |
| YAP | ↑[ | ↑[ |
Figure 2Smad-dependent onset of fibrosis. TGF-β1 binds to TGF-β Receptors type I and II (TGF-βRI and TGFβ-RII), involving Smad2/3, which must become phosphorylated in order to form a complex with Smad4. Smad7 has the capacity to repress the complex. The complex translocates to the nucleus, where it is required for the transcription of their target fibrogenesis genes.
Summary of the treatments to ameliorate renal fibrosis discussed in this review.
| Treatment | Amount Supplied | Time of Supplementation | Days until Euthanasia | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aliskiren | 20 mg/kg/day (3 or 7 days) | Immediately before UUO | 3, 7 | [ |
| Aliskiren and MZR | 20 mg/kg/day and 10 mg/kg/day | One day after and daily | 14 | [ |
| Alpha-lipoic acid | 60 mg/kg/day | Two days before and daily | 7 | [ |
| AKBA | 10, 20, 40 mg/kg/day | Immediately after and daily | 14 | [ |
| Amlodipine | 6.7 mg/kg/day | Immediately after | 7 | [ |
| Amygdalin | 3, 5 mg/kg/day | Immediately after and daily | 7, 14, 21 | [ |
| Applephenon | 0.05, 0.1, 0.15% where 0.1% is 40 mg/kg/day | One day after and daily | 7, 14, 21 | [ |
| ASPA | 10, 20, 40 mg/kg/day | Immediately after and daily | 14 | [ |
| AS-IV | 20 mg/kg/day | Immediately after and daily | 7, 14 | [ |
| BAIBA | 150 mg/kg/day | Immediately after and daily | 14 | [ |
| Colchicine | 30, 60, 100 µg/kg/day | Immediately after and daily | 7 | [ |
| Cryptotanshinone | 50 mg/kg/day | Seven days before and daily | 7 | [ |
| Curcumin | 50, 100 mg/kg/day | One day after and daily | 14 | [ |
| Curcumin | 200 mg/kg/day | Five days before and daily | 3 | [ |
| Curcumin | 200, 800 mg/kg/day | Seven days before and daily | 7 | [ |
| DIM | 100 mg/kg/day | Four weeks before and daily | 7 | [ |
| Empagliflozin | 10 mg/kg/day | One week before and daily | 14 | [ |
| Empagliflozin | 10 mg/kg/day | Immediately after | 14 | [ |
| Empagliflozin | 10 mg/kg/day | One week after and daily | 21 | [ |
| EGCG | 50 mg/kg/day | Immediately after and daily | 14 | [ |
| Erythropoietin | 1000 U/kg/day | One day before and every other day | 3, 7, 14 | [ |
| Fasudil | 1 g/L | Two days before and daily | 3, 7, 14 | [ |
| Fimasartan | 3 mg/kg/day | Immediately after and daily | 7 | [ |
| Fluorofenidone | 500 mg/kg/day | One day before and daily | 3, 7 | [ |
| hAFSCs | 3.5 × 105 cells | Immediately after | 1, 3, 7, 14 | [ |
| HSP47 siRNA | 50 µg/mouse | Immediately before | 0, 7, 14 | [ |
| Liraglutide | 600 µg/kg/day | Immediately after and daily | 7 | [ |
| LJ-1888 | 1, 10 mg/kg | Five days before and daily | 5 | [ |
| LJ-1888 | 1, 10 mg/kg | Three days after | 10 | [ |
| Meloxicam | 1 mg/kg/day | Immediately after and daily | 7 | [ |
| Metformin | 200 mg/kg/day | One day before | 7, 14 | [ |
| Pomolic acid | 0.4 mg/kg/day | Immediately after and two days after | 7 | [ |
| Poricoic acids | 5, 10, 20, 40 mg/kg/day | Immediately after and daily | 7 | [ |
| PR-619 | 100 µg per day | Immediately after | 7 | [ |
| Telbivudine | 1, 1.5, 2 g/kg/day | From day two and daily | 36 | [ |
| Thymoquinone | 10 mg/kg | Three days before and daily | 14 | [ |
| Valproic acid | 300 mg/kg/day | Five days before and daily | 14 | [ |
| Verteporfin | 100 mg/kg | Every other day after | 7, 14 | [ |
| Verteporfin | 100 mg/kg | Seven days after | 7, 14 | [ |
Figure 3Chemical structures of vitamin and antioxidant compounds tested for fibrosis-ameliorating activity in the context of the UUO model. The structures were obtained from the PubChem database [60]: the “PubChem CID” for each compound has been listed in the text next to the compound’s name.
Figure 4Chemical structures of pharmaceutical compounds tested for fibrosis-ameliorating activity in the context of the UUO model. The structures were obtained from the PubChem database [60]: the “PubChem CID” for each compound has been listed in the text next to the compound’s name.
Figure 5Chemical structures of plant-derived compounds tested for fibrosis-ameliorating activity in the context of the UUO model. The structures were obtained from the PubChem database [60]: the “PubChem CID” for each compound has been listed in the text next to the compound’s name.
Figure 6Chemical structures of purified or synthesized compounds and a selected recombinant protein tested for fibrosis-ameliorating activity in the context of the UUO model. The structures were obtained from the PubChem database [60]: the “PubChem CID” for each compound has been listed in the text next to the compound’s name.
Figure 7Encompassing summary of the histological lesions, protein levels or protein activities in untreated UUO and treated-UUO. The “UUO” section is the comparison between the untreated-UUO groups and the Sham-groups, whereas the “Treated-UUO” section is a comparison between the untreated-UUO groups and the treated UUO-groups. Up-arrows indicate increase, down-arrows indicate decrease and gray-underline indicates unchanged levels.