| Literature DB >> 34601681 |
Ameneh Yousefzadeh1, Afshin Maleki2, Saeed Dehestani Athar3, Ebrahim Darvishi3, Manochehr Ahmadi4, Ebrahim Mohammadi3, Van Tai Tang5, Rasoul Nassiri Kalmarzi6, Hajar Kashefi3.
Abstract
Exposure to bioaerosols in the air of hospitals is associated with a wide range of adverse health effects due to the presence of airborne microorganisms. Intensity and type of health effects depend on many factors such as the type, density, and diversity of bioaerosols in hospital environments. Therefore, identifying and determining their distribution in hospital environment contribute to reduce their adverse effects and maintain the physical health of patients and staff, as well as find the source of infections and possible allergies due to the presence of bioaerosols. Therefore, the present study was conducted to determine the type and concentration of the bacterial and fungal bioaerosols, and their distribution in the indoor and outdoor air of a teaching hospital to establish a reference for future studies or measures. The air samples were collected with a one-stage Anderson sampler and particle mass counter for a period of four months in the fall and winter of 2019. In total, 262 bacterial and fungal samples were collected from the air of the wards of Tohid Hospital, Sanandaj, Iran. Antibiotic resistance test, bacterial identification by PCR method, and modeling the dispersion of concentrations of bio-aerosols were also conducted. In order to identify bacteria and fungi, some biochemical and molecular tests and microscopic and macroscopic characteristic methods were applied, respectively. The results showed that the highest and lowest densities of the bioaerosols were observed in lung and operating wards (336.67 and 15.25 CFU/m3). Moreover, the highest and least concentrations of particles were seen in the emergency and operating wards, respectively. The most common fungi isolated from the hospital air were Penicillium (24.7%), Cladosporium (23. 4%), Aspergillus niger (13.3%), and Aspergillus Flavus (11.4%). Furthermore, the highest concentration of the isolated bacterium was Staphylococcus hemolyticus (31.84%). Most bacteria showed the highest resistance to gentamicin. The overall average hospital air pollution to bioaerosols was slightly higher than the standards proposed by international organizations. Due to the high concentration of bioaerosols and particles in the studied hospital, providing suitable conditions such as temperature, humidity, proper ventilation, and intelligent air conditioning system using efficient ventilation systems, and restricting the entrance of wards can reduce airborne particles in hospital environment.Entities:
Keywords: Airborne pollutants; Antibiotic resistance; Medical center; Microbial load; PCR,; Particulate matter
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34601681 PMCID: PMC8487404 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-16733-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Results of previous studies
| Reference | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital indoor PM10/PM2. 5 and associated trace elements in Guangzhou, China | 2009 | The results showed that indoor PM2.5 levels with an average of 99 μg / m3 were significantly higher than the outdoor PM2.5 standard (65 g / m3) as recommended by the EPA. | (Wang et al. |
| Evaluation of hospital wards indoor air quality: the particles concentration | 2016 | The mean 24 h concentrations of PM10, PM2.5 and PM0.3 were, respectively, 83.09, 21.47 and 1.6 μg/m3 at indoor parts of the hospital. The highest concentrations were observed in men cardiac, women internal, and women cardiac wards. As a result, a significant positive relationship as observed between temperature and humidity with the concentration of suspended particles in the mentioned sizes in the ambient air inside the wards. | (Shokri et al. |
| Profiles and seasonal distribution of airborne fungi in indoor and outdoor environments at a French hospital | 2009 | The mean viable fungal load was 122.1 CFU/m3 in outdoor air samples, and 4.1 and 3.9 CFU/m3 in samples from adult and pediatric hematology units, respectively. In outdoor samples, | (Sautour et al. |
| Antibiotic resistant airborne bacteria and their multidrug resistance pattern at University teaching referral Hospital in South Ethiopia | 2017 | (Solomon et al. | |
| Microbiological Surveillance of Operation Theatres: Five Year Retrospective Analysis from a Tertiary Care Hospital in North India | 2017 | The results showed that the lowest and highest rates of bacterial colony unit (CFU) was shown 17 200 CFU / m3 in eye surgery and emergency wards, respectively. And, 15 out of 64 samples taken were positive; th predominant Isolates were as follows: 4 | (Najotra et al. |
| Prevalence and susceptibilities of Coagulase Negative Staphylococci isolated in health care workers in a millitary hospital, Kermanshah | 2015 | 62% of the isolates were CNS strains ( | (Dadashi et al. |
Mean and standard deviation of fungal pollution load (CFU/m3) in the hospital
| Ward | Internal men | Internal women | Lung | Neurology | Infectious | Burn | ICU | Operating room | Emergency | Outside air |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average (CFU/m3) | 62.20 | 124.25 | 223.09 | 154.09 | 63.27 | 42.70 | 55.55 | 0.42 | 106.42 | 52.73 |
| Standard Deviation (CFU/m3) | 26.72 | 283.79 | 164.98 | 25.38 | 12.66 | 24.07 | 13.03 | 0.50 | 71.23 | 27.51 |
Fig. 1Frequency distribution of fungal species isolated in different wards of the hospital
The mean of bacterial number observed in each ward
| Ward | Average | Standard deviation | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Internal men | 148.00 | 65.154 | 0.071 |
| Internal women | 142.00 | 54.513 | |
| Lung | 113.58 | 37.378 | |
| Neurology | 92.66 | 28.053 | |
| Burn | 133.50 | 39.877 | |
| 90.33 | 18.712 | ||
| Infectious | 100.08 | 99.235 | |
| Operating room | 14.83 | 16.059 | |
| Emergency | 38.91 | 20.887 | |
| Outside air | 84.50 | 59.046 |
Fig. 2The percentage of bacterial colonies of the sampling points in different surfaces: EU GMP standard
Fig. 3Frequency distribution of different bacteria isolated in this study
Fig. 4General density of bioaerosols in each ward of the hospital (CFU/m3)
Antibiotic-resistant bacteria
| Staphylococcus hemolyticus | GM- CP- AZM- AMX- CFM |
| Staphylococcus aureus | GM - AMX- CFM |
| Pneumococcus | SXT- CFM- GM |
| Staphylococcus CONs (epidermidis) | CP- GM |
| Staphylococcus CONs (Saprophyticus) and Staphylococcus CONs (Epidermidis) and Bacillus | CFM |
| Lateus micrococcus | AMX |
| Streptococcus pyogenes | GM |
Fig. 5Agarose gel electrophoresis of the samples amplified by the PCR method
Fig. 6Possible dispersion of particles in each ward of the hospital
Fig. 7Arrangement of patient beds and ventilator outlets in the ICU
Fig. 8Possible dispersion of bacteria in each ward of the hospital
Fig. 9Possible dispersion of fungi in the ICU of the hospital