Literature DB >> 34599487

The reward positivity is sensitive to affective liking.

Darin R Brown1, Trevor C J Jackson2, James F Cavanagh2.   

Abstract

The EEG feature known as the Reward Positivity (RewP) is elicited by reward receipt and appears to reflect sensitively and specifically positive prediction errors during reinforcement learning. Yet, the RewP also is modulated by state and trait affect, suggesting that it has a more complex computational role than simple reinforcement surprise. We conducted a series of experiments aimed to investigate underlying affect processing reflected in the RewP during a reinforcement learning task. In the first experiment (N = 25), we manipulated the type of rewards a person could win (simple points or hedonically-appraised pictures). Although there were no differences in the amplitudes of the RewP for different types of rewards, there was a significant correlation between the individual rating of liking for the images and RewP amplitude. In a second experiment (N = 25), we manipulated reinforcement rates (easy vs. hard) and affective picture content (liked vs. ambivalent) to examine the potential interaction of prediction error and liking on RewP amplitude. We again found a significant relationship between liking and RewP amplitude, however, only in the hard condition. These findings suggest that the RewP reflects cortical computations of reward surprise as well as hedonic liking, identifying it as a possible nexus where multidimensional value is computed.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affect; Emotion; Liking; Prediction error; Reward positivity

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34599487      PMCID: PMC9578330          DOI: 10.3758/s13415-021-00950-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.526


  46 in total

Review 1.  Neural representations of subjective reward value.

Authors:  J Peters; C Büchel
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  The human orbitofrontal cortex: linking reward to hedonic experience.

Authors:  Morten L Kringelbach
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 3.  Review. The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: some current issues.

Authors:  Terry E Robinson; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  A study of emotional processing in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  T Benke; S Bösch; B Andree
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Reward positivity elicited by predictive cues.

Authors:  Clay B Holroyd; Olav E Krigolson; Seung Lee
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Dopamine Modulates the Functional Organization of the Orbitofrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Thorsten Kahnt; Philippe N Tobler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Rewarding images do not invoke the reward positivity: They inflate it.

Authors:  Darin R Brown; James F Cavanagh
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  Ventromedial prefrontal cortex encodes emotional value.

Authors:  Amy Winecoff; John A Clithero; R McKell Carter; Sara R Bergman; Lihong Wang; Scott A Huettel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Selective Devaluation Affects the Processing of Preferred Rewards.

Authors:  Dana M Huvermann; Christian Bellebaum; Jutta Peterburs
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.282

View more
  1 in total

1.  Amphetamine alters an EEG marker of reward processing in humans and mice.

Authors:  James F Cavanagh; Sarah L Olguin; Jo A Talledo; Juliana E Kotz; Benjamin Z Roberts; John A Nungaray; Joyce Sprock; David Gregg; Savita G Bhakta; Gregory A Light; Neal R Swerdlow; Jared W Young; Jonathan L Brigman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.530

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.