| Literature DB >> 34596507 |
Hovik Panosyan1, Armine Margaryan1, Nils-Kåre Birkeland2.
Abstract
Twelve thermophilic Anoxybacillus strains were isolated from sediment and water samples from a Karvachar hot spring located in the northern part of Nagorno-Karabakh. Based on phenotypic, chemotaxonomic and phylogenetic characteristics, one of the isolates, designated strain K1T, was studied in detail. The cells are straight, motile rods that are 0.2-0.4×2.3-7.2 µm in size. The strain is a Gram-stain-positive, moderately thermophilic facultative anaerobe with an optimum growth temperature of 60-65 °C and a growth temperature range of 45-70 °C. Growth of strain K1T was observed at pH 6-11 (optimum, pH 8-9) and was inhibited in the presence of NaCl concentrations above 2.5 % (optimum, 1-1.5 %). The isolate could utilize a wide variety of carbon sources, including d-arabinose, d-ribose, d-galactose, d-fructose, d-mannitol, maltose, aesculin, melibiose, sucrose, trehalose, raffinose, amidone, glycogen, turanose, d-lyxose, d-tagatose, potassium gluconate and 2-keto-gluconate. The strain was able to hydrolyse starch, casein and gelatin, was positive for oxidase and catalase, and reduced nitrate to nitrite, but was negative for H2S production. Production of urease and indole was not observed. The major cellular fatty acids were C15 : 0 iso, C16 : 0 and C17 : 0 iso (52.5, 13.6 and 19.6 % of total fatty acids, respectively). Strain K1T shares >99 % 16S rRNA sequence similarity and a genomic average nucleotide identity value of 94.5 % with its closest relative, Anoxybacillus flavithermus DSM 2641T, suggesting that it represents a separate and novel species, for which the name Anoxybacillus karvacharensis sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain of Anoxybacillus karvacharensis is K1T (=DSM 106524T=KCTC 15807T).Entities:
Keywords: Anoxybacillus; geothermal spring; next-generation sequencing; thermophiles; whole-genome sequencing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34596507 PMCID: PMC8604165 DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol ISSN: 1466-5026 Impact factor: 2.747
Fig. 1.Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences of strains K1T and K-99 (shown in bold) and representatives of all currently validly described species of the genus , inferred using the NJ method. Gaps and missing data were excluded. The optimal tree with the sum of branch length of 0.31395809 is shown. Accession numbers are shown in brackets. Bootstrap values (≥50 %) based on 1000 iterations are shown as percentages at the nodes. Bar, 0.01 nucleotide substitutions per site. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in mega X [28]. The tree was rooted with and 16S rRNA gene sequences.
Genome features and statistics of strain K1T
|
GenBank accession |
MQAD00000000 |
|---|---|
|
No. contigs |
59 |
|
No. base pairs |
2 722 200 |
|
Genome coverage |
1500× |
|
G+C content (mol%) |
41.6 |
|
No. rRNAs |
5, 4, 1 (5S, 16S, 23S) |
|
No. tRNAs |
64 |
|
No. genes (total) |
2883 |
|
No. CRISPRs |
Two arrays, 68 spacers |
*Assessed by CRISPRCasFinder (https://crisprcas.i2bc.paris-saclay.fr/CrisprCasFinder/Index).
Fig. 2.Phylogenomic tree of A. karvacharensis strain K1T and related type strains. The tree was inferred with FastME 2.1.6.1 [34] from genome blast distance phylogeny (GBDP) distances calculated from genome sequences using the TYGS server (https://tygs.dsmz.de) [35]. The branch lengths are scaled in terms of GBDP distance formula d5. The numbers at branches are GBDP pseudo-bootstrap support values ≥64 % from 100 replications with an average branch support of 97.7 %. The tree was rooted at the midpoint [36]. Genome sequence accession numbers are as follows: , CP020815.1; subsp. , GCA_000753835; , JACHES000000000.1; , JACHEQ000000000.1; , NZ_FOJQ00000000; , JXTH00000000.1; , JXTG00000000.1; , JACDUV000000000.1, , Gp0456347; , CP012152.1; , Gp0401003.
Fig. 3.Circular representation of the genome of strain K1T compared to DSM2641T as a reference. The rings were made using the blast Ring Image Generator (BRIG) server [37]. Rings from inside to outside: (1) G+C content (black); 2) GC skew (−, purple; +, green); (3) strain DSM2641T; (4) A. karvacharensis strain K1T, (5) the position of the nine rRNA operons (blue arcs) and the 12 genomic islands (red arcs) in the reference strain genome. Genomic islands were predicted by using IslandViewer 4 (www.pathogenomics.sfu.ca/islandviewer/).
Differential phenotypic characteristics of strain K1T and related species from the genus
Strain: 1, K1T; 2, subsp. DSM 2641T [1]; 3, subsp. KCTC 13759T [19]; 4, NCIMB 13971T [4]; 5, Anoxybacillus, salavatliensis DSM 22626T [20]; 6, JW/VK-KG4T [8]; 7, A. tengchongensis KCTC 13721T [13]; 8, KCTC 13720T [13]; 9, DSM 12423T [1, 38]. DSM 2641T was used as a reference strain. FA, facultative anaerobe; A, aerobe; AA, aerotolerant anaerobe; E, ellipsoidal; S, spherical; O, oval; T, terminal; ST, subterminal; VP, Voges–Proskauer; +, positive; −, negative; nd, not detected or no data.
|
Characteristics |
1* |
2* |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Size (µm), long/wide |
2.3–7.2/ 0.2–0.4 |
2.3–7.1/ 0.85 |
1.2–7.0/ 0.4–0.7 |
5.0/ 0.75 |
2.34/ 0.71 |
2.5–8.8/1.0 |
4.5–5.5/ 0.6–1.2 |
4.5–4.7/ 0.5–0.7 |
2.5–3.0/ 0.4–0.5 |
|
Motility |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
|
Spore shape |
E |
S |
E |
S |
E |
O |
E |
E |
S |
|
Spore location |
ST |
T |
T |
T |
T |
T |
T |
T |
T |
|
O2 requirement |
FA |
FA |
FA |
FA |
FA |
FA |
FA |
FA |
FA/AA |
|
Temperature range (°C) (optimum) |
45–70 (60–65) |
30–72 (60) |
30–66 (60) |
40–70 (55–60) |
37–69 (60) |
37–66 (57–62) |
30–75 (50) |
35–70 (55) |
37–65 (62) |
|
pH range (optimum) |
6.0–11.0 (8.0–9.0) |
6–9.0 (7.0) |
5.5–10.0 (7.0–7.5) |
6.0–10.0 (7.5–8.0) |
6.0–10.0 (8.0) |
5.7–9.9 (6.8–8.5) |
7.0–11.0 (8.5) |
7.0–11.0 (8.0) |
8.0–10.5 (9.5–9.7) |
|
NaCl tolerance (%, w/v) (optimum) |
2.5 (1.0–1.5) |
2.5 (0.5) |
3.5 (0.3) |
4 (2.0) |
4.5 (2) |
( |
4 (1.5) |
3 (0.5) |
3 (0.5–1.0) |
|
Catalase |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
|
Oxidase |
+ |
+ |
|
+ |
+ |
− |
+ |
+ |
|
|
VP test |
− |
+ |
|
|
− |
|
|
|
|
|
Nitrate reduction |
+ |
+ |
− |
+ |
+ |
|
+ |
− |
+ |
|
Utilization of: | |||||||||
|
|
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
|
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
|
|
− |
|
|
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
|
Maltose |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
|
|
+ |
+ |
− |
|
|
− |
|
|
− |
|
|
+ |
− |
+ |
|
+ |
+ |
|
|
− |
|
|
+ |
− |
− |
|
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
|
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
|
− |
+ |
|
|
− |
− |
|
|
− |
|
Hydrolysis of: | |||||||||
|
Starch |
+ |
+ |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
Casein |
+ |
+ |
|
− |
− |
− |
|
|
− |
|
Gelatin |
+ |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
*Data obtained in this study.