Literature DB >> 34591135

Metagenomic Analysis of Biochemical Passive Reactors During Acid Mine Drainage Bioremediation Reveals Key Co-selected Metabolic Functions.

Marcela Villegas-Plazas1,2, Janeth Sanabria1, Ziv Arbeli3, Yaneth Vasquez4, Fabio Roldan3, Howard Junca5.   

Abstract

Acid mine drainage (AMD) is the major pollutant generated by the mining industry, and it is characterized by low pH and high concentration of metals and sulfate. The use of biochemical passive reactors (BPRs) is a promising strategy for its bioremediation. To date, there are various studies describing the taxonomical composition of BPR microbial communities, generally consisting of an assemblage of sulfate-reducing organisms inside Deltaproteobacteria, and a diverse set of anaerobic (ligno)cellulolytic bacteria; however, insights about its functional metagenomic content are still scarce. In previous studies, a laboratory-scale AMD bioremediation using biochemical passive reactors was designed and performed, tracking operation parameters, chemical composition, and changes, together with taxonomic composition of the microbiomes harbored in these systems. In order to reveal the main functional content of these communities, we used shotgun metagenomics analyses to explore genes of higher relative frequencies and their inferred functions during the AMD bioremediation from three BPRs representing the main microbiome compositions detected in the system. Remarkably, genes encoding for two-component regulatory systems and ABC transporters related to metal and inorganic ions, cellulose degradation enzymes, dicarboxylic acid production, and sulfite reduction complex were all detected at increased frequency. Our results evidenced that higher taxonomic diversity of the microbiome was arising together with a functional redundancy of the specific metabolic roles, indicating its co-selection and suggesting that its enrichment on BPRs may be implicated in the cumulative efficiency of these systems.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AMD; Biochemical passive reactors; Bioremediation; Gene frequency; Metagenomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34591135     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-021-01872-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.192


  21 in total

Review 1.  Acid mine drainage remediation options: a review.

Authors:  D Barrie Johnson; Kevin B Hallberg
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Comparison of microbial community composition and activity in sulfate-reducing batch systems remediating mine drainage.

Authors:  L P Pereyra; S R Hiibel; A Pruden; K F Reardon
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Long term remediation of highly polluted acid mine drainage: a sustainable approach to restore the environmental quality of the Odiel river basin.

Authors:  Manuel A Caraballo; Francisco Macías; Tobias S Rötting; José Miguel Nieto; Carlos Ayora
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 4.  A critical review on remediation, reuse, and resource recovery from acid mine drainage.

Authors:  Gayathri Naidu; Seongchul Ryu; Ramesh Thiruvenkatachari; Youngkwon Choi; Sanghyun Jeong; Saravanamuthu Vigneswaran
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 5.  Microbial communities, processes and functions in acid mine drainage ecosystems.

Authors:  Lin-xing Chen; Li-nan Huang; Celia Méndez-García; Jia-liang Kuang; Zheng-shuang Hua; Jun Liu; Wen-sheng Shu
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 9.740

6.  Temporal-spatial characteristics and source apportionment of PM2.5 as well as its associated chemical species in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China.

Authors:  Jiajia Gao; Kun Wang; Yong Wang; Shuhan Liu; Chuanyong Zhu; Jiming Hao; Huanjia Liu; Shenbing Hua; Hezhong Tian
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 8.071

7.  Effect of hydraulic retention time on microbial community in biochemical passive reactors during treatment of acid mine drainage.

Authors:  Yaneth Vasquez; Maria C Escobar; Johan S Saenz; Maria F Quiceno-Vallejo; Carmen M Neculita; Ziv Arbeli; Fabio Roldan
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 8.  The Lancet Commission on pollution and health.

Authors:  Philip J Landrigan; Richard Fuller; Nereus J R Acosta; Olusoji Adeyi; Robert Arnold; Niladri Nil Basu; Abdoulaye Bibi Baldé; Roberto Bertollini; Stephan Bose-O'Reilly; Jo Ivey Boufford; Patrick N Breysse; Thomas Chiles; Chulabhorn Mahidol; Awa M Coll-Seck; Maureen L Cropper; Julius Fobil; Valentin Fuster; Michael Greenstone; Andy Haines; David Hanrahan; David Hunter; Mukesh Khare; Alan Krupnick; Bruce Lanphear; Bindu Lohani; Keith Martin; Karen V Mathiasen; Maureen A McTeer; Christopher J L Murray; Johanita D Ndahimananjara; Frederica Perera; Janez Potočnik; Alexander S Preker; Jairam Ramesh; Johan Rockström; Carlos Salinas; Leona D Samson; Karti Sandilya; Peter D Sly; Kirk R Smith; Achim Steiner; Richard B Stewart; William A Suk; Onno C P van Schayck; Gautam N Yadama; Kandeh Yumkella; Ma Zhong
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Biochemical passive reactors for treatment of acid mine drainage: Effect of hydraulic retention time on changes in efficiency, composition of reactive mixture, and microbial activity.

Authors:  Yaneth Vasquez; Maria C Escobar; Carmen M Neculita; Ziv Arbeli; Fabio Roldan
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 7.086

10.  Removal of sulfate and heavy metals by sulfate reducing bacteria in short-term bench scale upflow anaerobic packed bed reactor runs.

Authors:  Tony Jong; David L Parry
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 11.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.