Literature DB >> 27016821

Biochemical passive reactors for treatment of acid mine drainage: Effect of hydraulic retention time on changes in efficiency, composition of reactive mixture, and microbial activity.

Yaneth Vasquez1, Maria C Escobar2, Carmen M Neculita3, Ziv Arbeli2, Fabio Roldan4.   

Abstract

Biochemical passive treatment represents a promising option for the remediation of acid mine drainage. This study determined the effect of three hydraulic retention times (1, 2, and 4 days) on changes in system efficiency, reactive mixture, and microbial activity in bioreactors under upward flow conditions. Bioreactors were sacrificed in the weeks 8, 17 and 36, and the reactive mixture was sampled at the bottom, middle, and top layers. Physicochemical analyses were performed on reactive mixture post-treatment and correlated with sulfate-reducing bacteria and cellulolytic and dehydrogenase activity. All hydraulic retention times were efficient at increasing pH and alkalinity and removing sulfate (>60%) and metals (85-99% for Fe(2+) and 70-100% for Zn(2+)), except for Mn(2+). The longest hydraulic retention time (4 days) increased residual sulfides, deteriorated the quality of treated effluent and negatively impacted sulfate-reducing bacteria. Shortest hydraulic retention time (1 day) washed out biomass and increased input of dissolved oxygen in the reactors, leading to higher redox potential and decreasing metal removal efficiency. Concentrations of iron, zinc and metal sulfides were high in the bottom layer, especially with 2 day of hydraulic retention time. Sulfate-reducing bacteria, cellulolytic and dehydrogenase activity were higher in the middle layer at 4 days of hydraulic retention time. Hydraulic retention time had a strong influence on overall performance of passive reactors.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acid mine drainage (AMD); Biochemical passive reactor (BPR); Efficiency; Hydraulic retention time (HRT); Metal removal; Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27016821     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  5 in total

1.  Experiment on the treatment of acid mine drainage with optimized biomedical stone particles by response surface methodology.

Authors:  Junzhen Di; Mingxin Wang; Zhitao Zhu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Comparison of the efficiency of chitinous and ligneous substrates in metal and sulfate removal from mining-influenced water.

Authors:  Patricio X Pinto; Souhail R Al-Abed; John McKernan
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 6.789

3.  Metagenomic Analysis of Biochemical Passive Reactors During Acid Mine Drainage Bioremediation Reveals Key Co-selected Metabolic Functions.

Authors:  Marcela Villegas-Plazas; Janeth Sanabria; Ziv Arbeli; Yaneth Vasquez; Fabio Roldan; Howard Junca
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 4.192

4.  Hydraulic retention time and pH affect the performance and microbial communities of passive bioreactors for treatment of acid mine drainage.

Authors:  Tomo Aoyagi; Takaya Hamai; Tomoyuki Hori; Yuki Sato; Mikio Kobayashi; Yuya Sato; Tomohiro Inaba; Atsushi Ogata; Hiroshi Habe; Takeshi Sakata
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.298

Review 5.  From hairballs to hypotheses-biological insights from microbial networks.

Authors:  Lisa Röttjers; Karoline Faust
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 16.408

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.