Literature DB >> 34585261

A temporospatial histomorphometric analysis of bone density adjacent to acid-etched self-tapping dental implants with an external hexagon connection in the female baboon.

Lara L Ryan1, Sean S Kohles2,3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize osseointegration as the percent of bone-implant contact (%BIC) along the surface (0.0 mm) as well as at surface profiles 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm lateral to the implant, determining any differences between early occlusally loaded and non-loaded implants.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In ten adult female baboons, 120 dental implants were randomly placed in opposing mandibular and maxillary locations. Eighty sites had two groups of healing (no load) of either 1 (n = 40) or 2 (n = 40) months leading to 3 months of functional loading. These sites received full acid-etched surface implants. The 40 control implants represented healing only periods (no load) for 1 (n = 10), 2 (n = 10), 4 (n = 10), and 5 (n = 10) months. These implants were of a vertically split surface texture design (acid-etched and machined). Block sections and photomicrographs were obtained. Blinded histometric analyses determined the %BIC via a superimposed template.
RESULTS: The unloaded groups (1, 2, and 4 months) had higher %BIC compared to the 5-month group (p < 0.0001). The loaded groups exhibited mean bone densities of 59.2% and 55.5% (1-month healing at 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm, respectively) and 61.0% and 57.1% (2-month healing at 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm, respectively) with no significant difference between healing time (p = 0.4118).
CONCLUSION: There was a lateral increase in %BIC in the loaded compared to unloaded groups. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The decrease in bone densities at the 5-month unloaded group suggests that there is a critical earlier time period when dental implants should be placed into functional load.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acid-etched; Animal model; Bone adaptation; Histomorphometry; Implant

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34585261     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04195-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  30 in total

1.  Linear poroelastic cancellous bone anisotropy: trabecular solid elastic and fluid transport properties.

Authors:  Sean S Kohles; Julie B Roberts
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Crestal bone loss due to abutment manipulation and an internal silver deposition implant design in a canine model.

Authors:  Stefan Fickl; Christian F J Stappert; Sean S Kohles
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Applications of an anisotropic parameter to cortical bone.

Authors:  S S Kohles
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Histological evaluation of peri-implant bone at implants subjected to occlusal overload or plaque accumulation.

Authors:  F Isidor
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.977

5.  Immediate loading of Brånemark implants in edentulous mandibles: a preliminary report.

Authors:  T J Balshi; G J Wolfinger
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.454

6.  Effect of Implant Thread Geometry on Secondary Stability, Bone Density, and Bone-to-Implant Contact: A Biomechanical and Histological Analysis.

Authors:  Paolo Trisi; Marco Berardini; Antonello Falco; Michele Podaliri Vulpiani
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.454

Review 7.  The Role of Occlusion in Implant Therapy: A Comprehensive Updated Review.

Authors:  Rachel A Sheridan; Ann M Decker; Alexandra B Plonka; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.454

8.  Immediate loading of threaded implants at stage 1 surgery in edentulous arches: ten consecutive case reports with 1- to 5-year data.

Authors:  D P Tarnow; S Emtiaz; A Classi
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Elastic and physicochemical relationships within cortical bone.

Authors:  S S Kohles; D A Martinez
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000-03-15

10.  Direct assessment of profilometric roughness variability from typical implant surface types.

Authors:  Sean S Kohles; Melissa B Clark; Christopher A Brown; James N Kenealy
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.