Literature DB >> 34584881

Effects of cefuroxime axetil combined with Xingpi Yanger granules on the serum gastrin, motilin, and somatostatin levels in children with upper respiratory tract infection accompanied by diarrhea: results of a randomized trial.

Xiaohong Ren1, Yuying Wang2, Zimeng He3, Hongli Liu4, Kun Xue1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to investigate the effects of cefuroxime axetil combined with Xingpi Yanger granules on the treatment of upper respiratory tract infection accompanied by diarrhea and on serum gastrin (GAS), motilin (MOT), and somatostatin (SS) levels in children.
METHODS: In total, 124 children with upper respiratory tract infection accompanied by diarrhea admitted to the department of pediatrics in our hospital from May 2019 to May 2020 were selected and divided into a study group (n=62) and a reference group (n=62), according to admission number. The reference group children received routine treatment, while the children in the study group were treated with cefuroxime axetil combined with Xingpi Yanger granules. After treatment, each clinical index of the children in both groups was detected to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the different treatment methods.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in gender ratio, average age, mean body temperature, mean duration of diarrhea, average weight, or place of residence between the 2 groups (P>0.05); the total clinical effective rate after treatment in the study group was significantly higher than that in the reference group (P<0.05); the dehydration correction time, antipyretic time, antidiarrheal time, and total treatment time in the study group were all significantly lower than those in the reference group (P<0.001); the serum GAS and MOT levels at T1, T2, and T3 in the study group were significantly lower than those in the reference group (P<0.001), whereas the SS levels at T1, T2, and T3 in the study group were significantly higher than those in the reference group (P<0.001); and the incidence of adverse reactions of the children in the study group was significantly lower than that in the reference group (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Cefuroxime axetil combined with Xingpi Yanger granules can significantly lower serum GAS, MOT, and SS levels and shorten treatment time in children with upper respiratory tract infection accompanied by diarrhea, with significant clinical efficacy and high safety, and is thus worthy of application and promotion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100049234. 2021 Translational Pediatrics. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cefuroxime axetil; Xingpi Yanger granules; diarrhea; upper respiratory tract infection

Year:  2021        PMID: 34584881      PMCID: PMC8429862          DOI: 10.21037/tp-21-314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Pediatr        ISSN: 2224-4336


Introduction

Upper respiratory tract infection, defined as a generic term of acute inflammation in the nasal cavity, pharynx, or larynx, is a common acute respiratory infection (1,2). Due to their still developing immune function, children have weaker protection against bacterial invasion, with those younger than 5 years old being susceptible to upper respiratory tract infection. Diarrhea is a common complication of upper respiratory tract infection in children. It is mainly caused by immune system disorder, bacterial invasion, or common colds, with those in critical condition occasionally suffering from convulsions, acute abdominal pain, or other effects, which cumulatively pose a significant threat to children’s physical and mental health (3,4). The risk of respiratory tract infection in children with diarrhea is significantly increased. According to related reports, under the same environmental conditions, the risk of respiratory tract infection in children with diarrhea is 28% higher than that in normal children. Cefuroxime axetil, a commonly used antibiotic drug has a good therapeutic effect on the treatment of upper respiratory tract infection precipitated by a variety of pathogenic bacteria. Xingpi Yanger granules are a Chinese patent medicine, whose activity includes clearing away heat and toxic materials, relieving diarrhea, nourishing the blood, and tranquilization, and can be used to treat acute and chronic diarrhea caused by intestinal flora disturbance. When using antibiotics to treat respiratory tract infections in children, antibiotics should be used regularly to avoid the occurrence of antibiotic resistance, and a series of side effects caused by excessive use of antibiotics should also be paid attention to. Pay attention to the combination of drug treatment and the increase of physical resistance to avoid over-treatment. With the aim providing a better reference for clinical treatment, we investigated the effects of cefuroxime axetil combined with Xingpi Yanger granules on the treatment of upper respiratory tract infection accompanied by diarrhea in children. We present the following article in accordance with the CONSORT reporting checklist (available at https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-21-314).

Methods

General information

A total of 124 children with upper respiratory tract infection accompanied by diarrhea admitted to the department of pediatrics in Baoji maternal and child health care hospital from May 2019 to May 2020 were enrolled and divided into a study group (n=62) and a reference group (n=62), according to admission number. The study is a parallel study and allocation ratio is 1:1. All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). The study was approved by ethics board of Baoji maternal and child health care hospital (No.: 2018121403) and informed consent was taken from all the patients.

Inclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria were as follows: (I) children met the diagnostic criteria of upper respiratory tract infection and diarrhea as outlined in the 17th edition of the Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics (5); (II) children had diarrhea lasting for more than 1 day and that required medical treatment; and (III) according to the conditions of approval mandated by the Hospital Ethics Committee, the children and their family members all signed the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

The exclusion criteria were as follows: (I) children had severe diseases of the respiratory system, nervous system, or urinary system; (II) children had systemic infection or infections on other sites, and (III) children had poor mental status or treatment compliance and could not cooperate with others.

Study methods

In the reference group, the children received routine clinical treatment by the means of placing ice bags on children’s heads, using ethanol to wipe the areas around the great vessels (e.g., the axilla, groin, neck), or advising them to drink more warm water (6,7). In addition to physical cooling, the children were given ibuprofen suspension (State Food and Drug Administration approval number H19991011; Shanghai Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) orally no more than 4 times a day at 5–10 mg/kg until their body temperature returned to normal. The children were also given ribavirin granules (State Food and Drug Administration approval number H20066463; Sunflower Pharmaceutical Group Defeier Co., Ltd., Hengshui, China) orally, at 10 mg/kg, 3 times a day, along with live combined Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus tablets (State Food and Drug Administration approval number S19980004; Inner Mongolia Shuangqi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Inner Mongolia, China), 2 tablets each time and 3 times each day. In addition, depending on each child’s condition, intravenous infusion was carried out to correct electrolyte levels and maintain acid-base balance (8,9). In addition to above treatment in the control group, the children in the study group were administered cefuroxime axetil dispersible tablets (State Food and Drug Administration approval number H20030854; Guangzhou Nucien Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China) 0.125 g each time, twice each day. Furthermore, the children were also given Xingpi Yanger granules (State Food and Drug Administration approval number Z20025415; Guizhou Jianxing Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Guiyang, China); the granules were mixed with warm water. The administration protocol for the Xingpi Yanger granules was follows: children younger than 1 year: 2 g each time and twice each day; children aged 1–2 years old: 4 g each time and twice each day: children aged 3–6 years old: 4 g each time and 3 times per day. The children in both groups underwent 3 consecutive treatment cycles, with 1 cycle lasting 3 days.

Observation indices

The evaluation of clinical efficacy is detailed in . The dehydration correction time, antipyretic time, antidiarrheal time, and total treatment time were recorded and compared between the 2 groups (secondary outcome). Five milliliters of fasting venous blood was collected from the children in both groups before treatment (T0), 1 day after treatment (T1), 3 days after treatment (T2), and 7 days after treatment (T3). After centrifugation, the upper serum was collected, and gastrin (GAS) (primary outcome), motilin (MOT) expression levels (primary outcome) in the serum samples were detected by using a multimode reader (HED-SY96S, Shandong Horde Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., Weifang, China) with auxiliary kits. Meanwhile, the somatostatin (SS) levels (primary outcome) were acquired by radioimmunoassay. The adverse reactions between the 2 groups were also compared.
Table 1

Evaluation of clinical efficacy

Clinical efficacySymptoms
RecoveryAfter 1–2 days of treatment, the body temperature returned to normal, with no indication of further increase; the stool frequency returned to normal, and symptoms of abdominal pain and diarrhea completely disappeared
Marked effectivenessAfter 1–2 days of treatment, the temperature returned to normal, but occasionally increased again; stool frequency returned to normal, and the symptoms of diarrhea and abdominal pain disappeared
EffectivenessAfter 2–3 days of treatment, the body temperature decreased by more than 1 °C but did not return to normal, and the frequency of diarrhea and severity of abdominal pain decreased significantly compared with the pretreatment period
IneffectivenessChildren did not meet the above criteria and showed further deterioration

Total effective rate = recovery rate + marked effectiveness rate + effectiveness rate.

Total effective rate = recovery rate + marked effectiveness rate + effectiveness rate.

Statistical methods

All study data were processed for statistical analysis by SPSS 21.0 software (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA), and GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA. USA) was used to visualize the data. Measurement data are expressed by (), and were analyzed by t-test. Enumeration data are expressed as numbers and percentages and were analyzed by χ2 test. A P value <0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference.

Results

Comparison of clinical data between the 2 groups

showed the participant flow of this study. There were no significant differences in gender ratio, average age, mean body temperature, mean duration of diarrhea, average weight, and place of residence between the 2 groups (P>0.05), and the groups were thus comparable ().
Figure 1

Participant flow of this study.

Table 2

Comparison of clinical data between the 2 groups

TypesStudy group (n=62)Reference group (n=62)χ2/tP
Gender0.1300.718
   Male35 (56.45%)33 (53.23%)
   Female27 (43.55%)29 (46.77%)
Average age (years old)2.18±1.332.23±1.080.2300.819
Mean body temperature (°C)39.24±0.3339.31±0.411.0470.297
Mean duration of diarrhea (d)1.27±0.261.31±0.220.9250.357
Average weight (kg)12.24±2.5312.29±2.480.1110.912
Place of residence0.1310.717
   Urban area28 (45.16%)26 (41.94%)
   Rural area34 (54.84%)36 (58.06%)
Participant flow of this study.

Comparison of clinical efficacy between the 2 groups

The total clinical effective rate after treatment in the study group was significantly higher than that in the reference group (P<0.05), as shown in .
Table 3

Comparison of clinical efficacy between the two groups [n (%)]

GroupnRecoveryMarked effectivenessEffectivenessIneffectivenessTotal effective rate
Study group6219 (30.65%)28 (45.16%)12 (19.35%)3 (4.84%)95.16% (59/62)
Reference group6210 (16.13%)22 (35.48%)18 (29.03%)12 (19.35%)80.65% (50/62)
χ29.043
P0.003

Total effective rate = recovery rate + marked effectiveness rate + effectiveness rate.

Total effective rate = recovery rate + marked effectiveness rate + effectiveness rate.

Comparison of clinical improvement between the 2 groups

The dehydration correction time, antipyretic time, antidiarrheal time, and total treatment time in the study group were all significantly lower than those in the reference group (P<0.05), as shown in .
Table 4

Comparison of clinical improvement between the 2 groups (, d)

GroupnDehydration correction timeAntipyretic timeAntidiarrheal timeTotal treatment time
Study group621.16±0.421.13±0.381.52±0.415.82±1.73
Reference group621.75±0.361.62±0.291.94±0.448.22±1.63
t8.3988.0715.4997.950
P0.0000.0000.0000.000

Comparison of serum GAS levels at different time points between the 2 groups

There were significant differences in the GAS levels at T1, T2, and T3 between the 2 groups (P<0.05), as shown in .
Figure 2

Comparison of serum GAS levels at different time points between the 2 groups (). The abscissa represents T0, T1, T2, and T3, while the ordinate represents GAS level. The GAS levels at T0, T1, T2, and T3 in the study group were 1,249.35±54.33, 1,092.46±45.38, 859.45±37.43, and 733.63±31.64 µg/L, respectively. The GAS levels at T0, T1, T2, and T3 in the reference group were 1,257.46±54.59, 1,135.77±42.49, 925.31±36.78, and 817.52±33.98 µg/L, respectively. *, indicates that there were significant differences in the GAS levels at T1 between the 2 groups (t=5.486; P<0.000). **, indicates that there were significant differences in the GAS levels at T2 between the 2 groups (t=9.882; P=0.000). ***, indicates that there were significant differences in the GAS levels at T3 between the 2 groups (t=14.227; P=0.000).

Comparison of serum GAS levels at different time points between the 2 groups (). The abscissa represents T0, T1, T2, and T3, while the ordinate represents GAS level. The GAS levels at T0, T1, T2, and T3 in the study group were 1,249.35±54.33, 1,092.46±45.38, 859.45±37.43, and 733.63±31.64 µg/L, respectively. The GAS levels at T0, T1, T2, and T3 in the reference group were 1,257.46±54.59, 1,135.77±42.49, 925.31±36.78, and 817.52±33.98 µg/L, respectively. *, indicates that there were significant differences in the GAS levels at T1 between the 2 groups (t=5.486; P<0.000). **, indicates that there were significant differences in the GAS levels at T2 between the 2 groups (t=9.882; P=0.000). ***, indicates that there were significant differences in the GAS levels at T3 between the 2 groups (t=14.227; P=0.000).

Comparison of MOT levels at different time points between the 2 groups

There were significant differences in the MOT levels at T1, T2, and T3 between the 2 groups (P<0.05), as shown in .
Figure 3

Comparison of MOT levels at different time points between the 2 groups (). The abscissa represents T0, T1, T2 and T3, while the ordinate represents MOT level. The MOT levels at T0, T1, T2, and T3 in the study group were 594.35±36.17, 526.47±33.49, 452.33±25.48, and 282.34±21.37 µg/L, respectively. The MOT levels at T0, T1, T2, and T3 in the reference group were 589.47±34.15, 561.26±34.87, 503.26±24.35, and 319.55±21.69 µg/L, respectively. *, indicates that there were significant differences in the MOT levels at T1 between the 2 groups (t=5.666; P<0.000). **, indicates that there were significant differences in the MOT levels at T2 between the 2 groups (t=11.378; P=0.000). ***, indicates that there were significant differences in the MOT levels at T3 between the 2 groups (t=9.622; P=0.000).

Comparison of MOT levels at different time points between the 2 groups (). The abscissa represents T0, T1, T2 and T3, while the ordinate represents MOT level. The MOT levels at T0, T1, T2, and T3 in the study group were 594.35±36.17, 526.47±33.49, 452.33±25.48, and 282.34±21.37 µg/L, respectively. The MOT levels at T0, T1, T2, and T3 in the reference group were 589.47±34.15, 561.26±34.87, 503.26±24.35, and 319.55±21.69 µg/L, respectively. *, indicates that there were significant differences in the MOT levels at T1 between the 2 groups (t=5.666; P<0.000). **, indicates that there were significant differences in the MOT levels at T2 between the 2 groups (t=11.378; P=0.000). ***, indicates that there were significant differences in the MOT levels at T3 between the 2 groups (t=9.622; P=0.000).

Comparison of SS levels at different time points between the 2 groups

There were significant differences in the SS levels at T1, T2, and T3 between the 2 groups (P<0.05), as shown in .
Figure 4

Comparison of SS levels at different time points between the 2 groups (). The abscissa represents T0, T1, T2, and T3, while the ordinate represents the SS level. The SS levels at T0, T1, T2, and T3 in the study group were 23.56±3.17, 29.62±4.51, 32.46±4.18, and 45.72±4.57 pg/mL, respectively. The SS levels at T0, T1, T2, and T3 in the reference group were 23.63±3.21, 26.02±4.31, 27.11±3.91, and 35.61±4.21 pg/mL, respectively. *, indicates that there were significant differences in the SS levels at T1 between the 2 groups (t=4.544; P<0.000). **, indicates that there were significant differences in the SS levels at T2 between the 2 groups (t=7.360; P=0.000). ***, indicates that there were significant differences in the SS levels at T3 between the 2 groups (t=12.812; P=0.000).

Comparison of SS levels at different time points between the 2 groups (). The abscissa represents T0, T1, T2, and T3, while the ordinate represents the SS level. The SS levels at T0, T1, T2, and T3 in the study group were 23.56±3.17, 29.62±4.51, 32.46±4.18, and 45.72±4.57 pg/mL, respectively. The SS levels at T0, T1, T2, and T3 in the reference group were 23.63±3.21, 26.02±4.31, 27.11±3.91, and 35.61±4.21 pg/mL, respectively. *, indicates that there were significant differences in the SS levels at T1 between the 2 groups (t=4.544; P<0.000). **, indicates that there were significant differences in the SS levels at T2 between the 2 groups (t=7.360; P=0.000). ***, indicates that there were significant differences in the SS levels at T3 between the 2 groups (t=12.812; P=0.000).

Comparison of adverse reactions between the 2 groups

The total incidence of adverse reactions of the patients in the study group was significantly lower than that in the reference group (P<0.05), as shown in .
Figure 5

Comparison of adverse reactions between the 2 groups [n (%)]. The abscissa represents anaphylaxis, sitophobia, and rash, while the ordinate represents the case.

Comparison of adverse reactions between the 2 groups [n (%)]. The abscissa represents anaphylaxis, sitophobia, and rash, while the ordinate represents the case. The number of cases of anaphylaxis, photophobia, and rash were 1, 2, and 1, respectively, in the study group; and 5, 6 and 2, respectively, in the reference group. There were significant differences in the total incidence of adverse reactions between the 2 groups (χ2=6.279; P=0.012).

Discussion

Upper respiratory tract infection is mainly caused by the invasion of various pathogenic bacteria, including viruses and bacteria, and studies have reported that most children are subject to secondary bacterial infection; therefore, the combination of antiviral and antibacterial therapy should be carried out in clinical treatment (10-12). Additionally, upper respiratory tract infection is characterized by a critical onset and high recurrence rate—reaching up to over 10 times annually—which seriously affects children’s growth, development, and their daily life. Treatment of this disease has thus become a major concern of pediatricians (13-15). In addition, the invasion of pathogenic bacteria incurred by upper respiratory tract infection can also lead to immune system disorders, which mainly manifest as an alteration in intestinal flora, meaning diarrhea is a common complication of upper respiratory tract infection. The affected children with diarrhea mostly present with increased frequency of defecation, changed stool shapes, and, in some severe cases, are even accompanied by different degrees of vomiting, abdominal pain, and other symptoms, or dehydration caused by an acid–base imbalance in their bodies (16). Generally, children with diarrhea have an acute and rapid progression; consequently, timely targeted drug treatment according to children’s clinical symptoms should be conducted to improve treatment effects. Moreover, the regulation of the balance of intestinal flora should be prioritized in the treatment of upper respiratory tract infection accompanied by diarrhea in children (17,18). Xingpi Yanger granules, are a commonly used Chinese medicinal compound preparation for the treatment of upper respiratory tract infection in children. This compound has fewer side effects and higher clinical safety than do other drugs and exerts the effects of invigorating the spleen to eliminate dampness, regulating intestinal hormones and enhancing stronger adsorption of pathogenic bacteria, reducing the damage of pathogenic bacteria to the intestinal gastric mucosa to a certain extent, relieving intestinal clinical symptoms, and promoting the treatment of diarrhea (19-21). Cefuroxime axetil is a cephalosporin antibiotic, and its mechanism of action is to inhibit the synthesis of the bacterial cell wall by covalently binding to bacterial transpeptidase, which leads to bacterial death; it can also bind to penicillin to inhibit the formation of the bacterial cross-linking wall in the proliferation phase and kill bacteria in the reproduction phase; therefore, it is often used to treat upper respiratory tract infection caused by various bacteria. Cefuroxime axetil has good oral absorption and broad-spectrum antibacterial activity. Cefuroxime axetil has been widely used in the treatment of upper respiratory tract infections and diarrhea. The treatment of cefuroxime axetil in patients with upper respiratory tract infection and diarrhea can effectively remove bacteria in patients with good tolerance, safe and reliable curative effect, and has important clinical application value (22,23). GAS and MOT increased and SS decreased in children with pneumonia secondary diarrhea, indicating that there were changes in gastrointestinal hormones in children with diarrhea. Gastrointestinal hormones can significantly affect the secretion, movement and absorption of gastrointestinal tract, biliary tract and pancreas, and play a certain role in the pathophysiology of diarrhea. Xingpi Yanger granule has obvious regulatory effect on GAS, MOT and SS in children with pneumonia secondary diarrhea. The clinical effect of Xingpi Yanger granule was good, and the serum gastrin, plasma motilin and somatostatin were close to normal after treatment. MOT can stimulate the motility of intestinal smooth muscles, GAS is a hormone secreted by the mucosa of the small intestine that can increase the secretion of gastric acid and the contraction of antrum, and SS is a common inhibitory hormone that can reduce the basal level of gastric acid and relieve the peristalsis of the gastrointestinal tract in patients to some extent (24). In this study, the results revealed that serum GAS and MOT levels at T1, T2, and T3 in the study group were significantly lower than those in the reference group, whereas the SS levels at T1, T,2 and T3 in the study group were significantly higher than those in the reference group, indicating that cefuroxime axetil combined with Xingpi Yanger granules could lower serum GAS and MOT levels, improve SS levels, delay the peristalsis of the gastrointestinal tract, and reduce the occurrence of diarrhea. Pedata et al. (25) reported that after the children with pneumonia accompanied by diarrhea were treated with Xingpi Yanger granules, the serum MOT levels after treatment (448.71±13.42 µg/L) were significantly lower than those before treatment (583.29±42.66 µg/L), indicating that Xingpi Yanger granules can inhibit the secretion of serum MOT and improve intestinal function in children. In conclusion, cefuroxime axetil combined with Xingpi Yanger granules can effectively improve gastrointestinal function in children with upper respiratory tract infection accompanied by diarrhea with significant clinical efficacy and high safety, and is thus worthy of application and promotion. The article’s supplementary files as
  24 in total

1.  Peripheral TREM1 responses to brain and intestinal immunogens amplify stroke severity.

Authors:  Qingkun Liu; Emily M Johnson; Rachel K Lam; Qian Wang; Hong Bo Ye; Edward N Wilson; Paras S Minhas; Ling Liu; Michelle S Swarovski; Stephanie Tran; Jing Wang; Swapnil S Mehta; Xi Yang; Joshua D Rabinowitz; Samuel S Yang; Mehrdad Shamloo; Christoph Mueller; Michelle L James; Katrin I Andreasson
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 25.606

Review 2.  Old and New Gut Hormone, Gastrin and Acid Suppressive Therapy.

Authors:  Ken Haruma; Tomoari Kamada; Noriaki Manabe; Mitsuhiko Suehiro; Hirofumi Kawamoto; Akiko Shiotani
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.216

3.  Feline upper respiratory tract infection and disease in Australia.

Authors:  Dalton Nguyen; Vanessa R Barrs; Mark Kelman; Michael P Ward
Journal:  J Feline Med Surg       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.015

4.  Erythema Nodosum Leprosum Triggered by Antecedent Influenza Vaccine and Respiratory Tract Infection: A Case Report.

Authors:  Matthew K Sandre; Sonia M Poenaru; Andrea K Boggild
Journal:  J Cutan Med Surg       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.092

5.  Somatostatin stimulates colonic MUC2 expression through SSTR5-Notch-Hes1 signaling pathway.

Authors:  Shuailing Song; Xiao Li; Chong Geng; Yanni Li; Chunhui Wang
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Mucosa-Associated Microbiota in the Gastrointestinal Tract of Healthy Japanese Subjects.

Authors:  Saori Kashiwagi; Yuji Naito; Ryo Inoue; Tomohisa Takagi; Takahiro Nakano; Yutaka Inada; Akifumi Fukui; Kazuhiro Katada; Katsura Mizushima; Kazuhiro Kamada; Kazuhiko Uchiyama; Osamu Handa; Takeshi Ishikawa; Yoshito Itoh
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 3.216

7.  Co-processing of cefuroxime axetil by spray drying technique for improving compressibility and flow property.

Authors:  Punit Rathod; Dhaval Mori; Ramesh Parmar; Moinuddin Soniwala; Jayant Chavda
Journal:  Drug Dev Ind Pharm       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Mechanism of Asbt (Slc10a2)-related bile acid malabsorption in diarrhea after pelvic radiation.

Authors:  Lina Wang; Yan Zhou; Xiaohu Wang; Guangwen Zhang; Bin Guo; Xiaoming Hou; Juntao Ran; Qiuning Zhang; Chengcheng Li; Xueshan Zhao; Yichao Geng; Shuangwu Feng
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.694

9.  Somatostatin receptors (SSTR1-5) on inhibitory interneurons in the barrel cortex.

Authors:  Agnieszka Lukomska; Grzegorz Dobrzanski; Monika Liguz-Lecznar; Malgorzata Kossut
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.270

10.  Overexpression of somatostatin receptor type 2 in neuroendocrine tumors for improved Ga68-DOTATATE imaging and treatment.

Authors:  Rachael Guenter; Tolulope Aweda; Danilea M Carmona Matos; Samuel Jang; Jason Whitt; Yi-Qiang Cheng; X Margaret Liu; Herbert Chen; Suzanne E Lapi; Renata Jaskula-Sztul
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Effect of somatostatin on postoperative gastrointestinal function and stress level in children with acute abdomen: a prospective randomized controlled study].

Authors:  Bo-Xiang Qi; Lei Zhu; Li-Ping Sheng; Na-Na Wen; Xiao Cheng; Shuang-Shuang Hu; Tong Qian
Journal:  Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-07-15

Review 2.  FDA-Approved Oximes and Their Significance in Medicinal Chemistry.

Authors:  Jyothi Dhuguru; Eugene Zviagin; Rachid Skouta
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.