Literature DB >> 3457765

Hypersensitivity to mercury, nickel and chromium in relation to dental materials.

D Burrows.   

Abstract

Three metals which are used in dental materials are recognized as causing sensitization sufficiently frequently to consider whether problems might arise from their use in dentistry. These metals are, mercury, nickel and chromium. Nickel is by far the commonest sensitizer, 10 per cent of women are allergic to nickel; sensitization usually occurs through jewellery or fasteners on articles of clothing. Chromium (as chromate) is a much less common sensitizer for several reasons. Sensitization only occurs through hexavalent salts of chromate and the degree of exposure of humans to these salts is much less than to either nickel or mercury. The true incidence of mercury sensitization is difficult to ascertain because many of the materials which were used for patch testing previously and on which statistics were based, contained unnecessarily high concentrations of mercury, and the pattern of mercury allergy is changing because many substances which contain mercury and were used frequently are not now employed. Although metallic mercury can sensitize the evidence would suggest that if dental amalgams ever cause people to become allergic to mercury, it is an extremely rare occurrence. Problems with mercury-containing amalgams in those sensitized are also rare, only 28 cases have been recorded in the literature. Thus, it is likely that at the present time sensitization to mercury is uncommon and decreasing. There is even less evidence that nickel or chromate in dental materials actively sensitize and it is exceptionally rare to have problems with these metals in a prosthesis in someone who is already sensitized.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3457765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Dent J        ISSN: 0020-6539            Impact factor:   2.512


  5 in total

1.  Assessment of nickel release from stainless steel crowns.

Authors:  Nahid Ramazani; Rahil Ahmadi; Mansure Darijani
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2014-05-31

2.  Assessment of nickel release from various dental appliances used routinely in pediatric dentistry.

Authors:  Parimala Kulkarni; Suchi Agrawal; Arpana Bansal; Ankur Jain; Utkarsh Tiwari; Ayushi Anand
Journal:  Indian J Dent       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

3.  A CAD/CAM Zirconium Bar as a Bonded Mandibular Fixed Retainer: A Novel Approach with Two-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Maen Zreaqat; Rozita Hassan; Abdul Fatah Hanoun
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2017-07-27

4.  In vivo study on the release of nickel, chromium, and zinc in saliva and serum from patients treated with fixed orthodontic appliances.

Authors:  Dilip Daniel Quadras; U S Krishna Nayak; N Suchetha Kumari; H R Priyadarshini; Srinivasa Gowda; Bennete Fernandes
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug

5.  DNA damage in oral mucosa cells of patients with fixed orthodontic appliances.

Authors:  Farzin Heravi; Mohammad Reza Abbaszadegan; Mohsen Merati; Nadia Hasanzadeh; Ezzat Dadkhah; Farzaneh Ahrari
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2013-11-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.