| Literature DB >> 34569651 |
Wijdan Al-Ahmadi1, Thomas S Webberley1, Alex Joseph1, Ffion Harris1, Yee-Hung Chan1, Reem Alotibi1, Jessica O Williams1, Alaa Alahmadi1, Thomas Decker2, Timothy R Hughes3, Dipak P Ramji1.
Abstract
Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the vasculature regulated by cytokines. We have previously shown that extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1/2 (ERK1/2) plays an important role in serine 727 phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription-1 (STAT1) transactivation domain, which is required for maximal interferon-γ signaling, and the regulation of modified LDL uptake by macrophages in vitro. Unfortunately, the roles of ERK1/2 and STAT1 serine 727 phosphorylation in atherosclerosis are poorly understood and were investigated using ERK1 deficient mice (ERK2 knockout mice die in utero) and STAT1 knock-in mice (serine 727 replaced by alanine; STAT1 S727A). Mouse Atherosclerosis RT² Profiler PCR Array analysis showed that ERK1 deficiency and STAT1 S727A modification produced significant changes in the expression of 18 and 49 genes, respectively, in bone marrow-derived macrophages, with 17 common regulated genes that included those that play key roles in inflammation and cell migration. Indeed, ERK1 deficiency and STAT1 S727A modification attenuated chemokine-driven migration of macrophages with the former also impacting proliferation and the latter phagocytosis. In LDL receptor deficient mice fed a high fat diet, both ERK1 deficiency and STAT1 S727A modification produced significant reduction in plaque lipid content, albeit at different time points. The STAT1 S727A modification additionally caused a significant reduction in plaque content of macrophages and CD3 T cells and diet-induced cardiac hypertrophy index. In addition, there was a significant increase in plasma IL-2 levels and a trend toward increase in plasma IL-5 levels. These studies demonstrate important roles of STAT1 S727 phosphorylation in particular in the regulation of atherosclerosis-associated macrophage processes in vitro together with plaque lipid content and inflammation in vivo, and support further assessment of its therapeutical potential.Entities:
Keywords: LDL receptor deficient mice; atherosclerosis; extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2; inflammation; signal transducer and activator of transcription-1
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34569651 PMCID: PMC9549671 DOI: 10.1096/fj.202100571RR
Source DB: PubMed Journal: FASEB J ISSN: 0892-6638 Impact factor: 5.834
FIGURE 1The effect of ERK1 deficiency and STAT1 S727A modification on the expression of atherosclerosis‐associated genes and the proliferation of macrophages. BMDM were isolated from C57BL/6J (Control), ERK1−/−, or STAT1 S727A mice and cultured for 24 h. (A) RNA was isolated and gene expression analyzed using RT2 Profiler PCR Arrays as described in Materials and Methods. The heat maps present the log2 fold change in gene expression in BMDM from ERK1−/− or STAT1 S727A mice following normalization to the C57BL/6J control, which was arbitrarily assigned as 1. The Genesis software was used to assess gene expression signals and clustering with a scale of color changes on the top of the heat map showing the intensity of gene expression. The full list of genes together with the changes in their expression are shown in Tables S1 and S2. (B, C) Media were removed from the cells and used to determine cell viability by following LDH release (C) with the remaining cells subjected to the crystal violet assay to assess proliferation (B). The changes in BMDM from ERK1−/− or STAT1 S727A mice were normalized to the control, which was arbitrarily assigned as 100%. The data (mean ± SEM) are from four independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using a one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test (*p ≤ .05; ***p ≤ .001)
The effect of ERK1 deficiency and STAT1 S727A modification on the expression of key atherosclerosis‐associated genes according to function
| Gene function | ERK1−/− | STAT1 S727A | Common genes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stress responses (e.g., inflammatory responses, response to pests, pathogens, or parasites) |
|
|
|
| Apoptosis | ( |
|
|
| Blood coagulation and circulation |
| ||
| Cell adhesion molecules |
|
|
|
| Extracellular matrix molecules |
|
|
|
| Lipid transport and metabolism |
|
|
|
| Cell growth and proliferation |
|
|
|
| Transcriptional regulation |
|
|
|
↑ indicates induction or ↓ reduction in expression with those in parenthesis showing trends (p values between .05 and .1).
Abbreviations: Abca1, ATP‐binding cassette, subfamily A (ABC1), member 1; Ace, angiotensin I converting enzyme (peptidyl‐dipeptidase A) 1; Apoa1, apolipoprotein A‐I; ApoB, apolipoprotein B; Bcl2, B cell leukemia/lymphoma 1; Bcl2a1a (Bfl‐1, A1), B cell leukemia/lymphoma 2 related protein A1a; Bcl2I1 (Bcl‐XL), BCL2‐like 1; Ccl2 (MCP‐1), chemokine (C‐C motif) ligand 2; Ccr1, chemokine (C‐C motif) receptor 1; Ccr2, chemokine (C‐C motif) receptor 2; Cdh5, cadherin 5; Csf2 (GMCSF), colony stimulating factor 2 (granulocyte‐macrophage); Ctgf, connective tissue growth factor; Cxcl1 (Gro1), chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 1; Eln, elastin; Eng1 (Evi‐1), endoglin; Fas (TNFRSF6), TNF receptor superfamily member 6; Fga, fibrinogen α chain; Fgb, fibrinogen β chain; Fgf2 (bFGF), fibroblast growth factor 2; Hbegf (Dtr), heparin‐binding EGF‐like growth factor; Ifng, interferon‐γ; Il1a, interleukin‐1α; Il1b, interleukin‐1β; Il1r1, interleukin 1 receptor, type I; Il1r2, interleukin 1 receptor, type II; Il2, interleukin‐2; Il3, interleukin‐3; Il4, interleukin‐4; Il5, interleukin‐5; Itga2, integrin α2; Itga5, integrin α5 (fibronectin receptor α); Itgax, integrin α X; Lama1, laminin α1; Lif, leukemia inhibitory factor; Lpl, lipoprotein lipase; Lypla1, lysophospholipase 1; Mmp1a, matrix metallopeptidase 1a (interstitial collagenase); Mmp3, matrix metallopeptidase 3; Nfkb1, nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B cells 1, p105; Npy, neuropeptide Y; Nr1h3, nuclear receptor subfamily 1, h group H, member 3; Pdgfa, platelet derived growth factor α; Pdgfb, platelet derived growth factor, B polypeptide; Pdgfrb, platelet derived growth factor receptor, beta polypeptide; Plin2, perlipin 2; Ppara, peroxisome proliferator activated receptor α; Ppard, peroxisome proliferator activated receptor δ; Ptgs1 (COX1), prostaglandin‐endoperoxide synthase 1; Rxra, retinoid X receptor α; Sele, selectin, endothelial cells; Sell (LECAM‐1), selectin, lymphocyte; Selpg (P‐Selectin), selectin, platelet (p‐selectin) ligand; Spp1, secreted phosphoprotein 1; Tgfb1, transforming growth factor‐β1; Tgfb2, transforming growth factor‐β2; Thbs4, thrombospondin 4; Tnc, tenascin C; Tnf, tumor necrosis factor; Tnfaip3, tumor necrosis factor, alpha‐induced protein 3; Vcam1, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1; Vegfa, vascular endothelial growth factor A; Vwf, Von Willebrand factor.
FIGURE 2The ERK1 deficiency and STAT1 S727A modification attenuate chemokine‐driven macrophage migration. Migration of BMDM from C57BL/6J (Control), ERK1−/−, or STAT1 S727A mice in response to the chemokine MCP‐1 (20 ng/ml, +) was carried out as described in Materials and Methods. Migration of BMDM from control mice in the absence of MCP‐1 (−) was also analyzed for comparative purposes. The migration of the cells was assessed by counting the migrated cells using a fluorescence microscope after staining them with DAPI. Representative images are presented in panel A with graphs in panel B showing fold change in migration (mean ± SEM) from four independent experiments (the value in Control + has been arbitrarily assigned as 1). Statistical analysis was performed using a one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test (*p ≤ .05; ***p ≤ .001)
FIGURE 3The effect of ERK1 deficiency and STAT1 S727A modification on key macrophage processes associated with atherosclerosis. BMDM were isolated from C57BL/6J (Control), ERK1−/−, or STAT1 S727A mice. (A) ROS production was stimulated by incubation with 50 μM TBHP for 3 h (+). BMDM from corresponding mice without any treatment with TBHP were also included for comparative purposes (−). Fluorescence was measured at 495 nm and 520 nm for excitation and emission spectra, respectively. Graph shows mean ± SEM from three independent experiments where ROS production in cells in the absence of any TBHP stimulation has been arbitrarily assigned as 1. (B) The cells were treated for 24 h with Dil‐oxLDL (5 μg/ml) and the uptake assessed by flow cytometry. Graph shows mean ± SEM from three independent experiments with Dil‐oxLDL uptake in BMDM from control mice arbitrarily assigned as 1. (C) Phagocytosis was monitored by the uptake of fluorescently labeled Escherichia coli strain K‐12 following 2 h treatment using a VybrantTM Phagocytosis Assay Kit. Graph shows mean ± SEM from four independent experiments with phagocytosis in BMDM from control mice arbitrarily assigned as 1. (D) Macropinocytosis was assessed by determining the uptake of LY (100 μg/ml) after 24 h incubation followed by flow cytometry. Graph shows mean ± SEM from three independent experiments with macropinocytosis in BMDM from control mice arbitrarily assigned as 1. (E) Macrophages were first converted into foam cells by incubation with 0.5 μCi/ml [14C]‐cholesterol and 25 μg/ml AcLDL for 24 h. Cholesterol efflux following incubation for 24 h with 10 μg/ml ApoA1 acceptor was then determined by scintillation counting as described in Materials and Methods. Graph shows mean ± SEM from five independent experiments with efflux in BMDM from control mice arbitrarily assigned as 1. In all cases, statistical analysis was performed using a one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test (***p ≤ .001)
FIGURE 4The effect of ERK1 deficiency and STAT1 S727A modification on cardiac hypertrophy index. LDLR−/−, LDLR−/−/ERK1−/−, or LDLR−/−/STAT1 S727A mice were fed a HFD for 12‐ or 24‐weeks as indicated. Heart hypertrophy was determined by dividing the heart weight (HW; mg) by the tibia length (TL; mm) for each mice. Graph shows mean ± SEM (n = 12, n = 12 and n = 11, respectively, for LDLR−/−, LDLR−/−/ERK1−/−, or LDLR−/−/STAT1 S727A mice fed HFD for 12 weeks and n = 12, n = 12 and n = 11, respectively, for LDLR‐/, LDLR−/−/ERK1−/− or LDLR−/−/STAT1 S727A mice fed HFD for 24 weeks). Statistical analysis was performed using a two‐way ANOVA with Sidak post hoc test (**p ≤ .01)
FIGURE 5ERK1 deficiency and STAT1 S727A modification impact the lipid content and occlusion of plaques. LDLR−/−, LDLR−/−/ERK1−/−, or LDLR−/−/STAT1 S727A mice were fed HFD for 12 or 24 weeks. Sections of the aortic root were stained with Oil red O and hematoxylin counterstain. Representative images are shown in panel A (5× magnification and scale bar of 400 μm). The graphs in panel B‐C show mean ± SEM of lipid content within the plaque [n = 12, n = 10 and n = 12, respectively, for LDLR−/−, LDLR−/−/ERK1−/−, or LDLR−/−/STAT1 S727A mice fed HFD for 12 weeks (B) and n = 12, n = 13, and n = 14, respectively, for LDLR−/−, LDLR−/−/ERK1−/−, or LDLR−/−/STAT1 S727A mice fed HFD for 24 weeks (C)]. The graphs in panel D‐E shows mean ± SEM of percentage plaque occlusion [n = 13, n = 11, and n = 11, respectively, for LDLR−/−, LDLR−/−/ERK1−/−, or LDLR−/−/STAT1 S727A mice fed HFD for 12 weeks (D) and n = 13, n = 14, and n = 15, respectively, for LDLR−/−, LDLR−/−/ERK1−/−, or LDLR−/−/STAT1 S727A mice fed HFD for 24 weeks (E)]. Statistical analysis was performed using a one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test (*p ≤ .05; **p ≤ .01; ***p ≤ .001)
FIGURE 6The STAT1 S727A modification attenuates plaque macrophage content following feeding of HFD for 12 weeks. LDLR−/−, LDLR−/−/ERK1−/−, or LDLR−/−/STAT1 S727A mice were fed a HFD for 12 or 24 weeks (A, C and B, D, respectively). Sections of the aortic root were stained for MOMA‐2 positive macrophages. Representative images are shown in panels A‐B (5× magnification and scale bar of 400 μm). The graphs show mean ± SEM of the MOMA‐2 macrophage content within the plaque [n = 9, n = 11, and n = 10, respectively, for LDLR−/−, LDLR−/−/ERK1−/−, or LDLR−/−/STAT1 S727A mice fed HFD for 12 weeks (C) and n = 13, n = 14, and n = 13, respectively for LDLR−/−, LDLR−/−/ERK1−/−, or LDLR−/−/STAT1 S727A mice fed HFD for 24 weeks (D)]. Statistical analysis was performed using a one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test (*p ≤ .05; ***p ≤ .001)
FIGURE 7The effect of ERK1 deficiency and STAT1 S727A modification on CD3+ T‐cell content following feeding of HFD. LDLR−/−, LDLR−/−/ERK1−/−, or LDLR−/−/STAT1 S727A mice were fed HFD for 12 or 24 weeks (A, C and B, D, respectively). Sections of the aortic root were stained for CD3+ positive T cells. Representative images are shown in panels A‐B (5× magnification and scale bar of 400 μm). The graphs show mean ± SEM of the CD3+ T cells within the plaque [n = 9, n = 10, and n = 9, respectively, for LDLR−/−, LDLR−/−/ERK1−/−, or LDLR−/−/STAT1 S727A mice fed HFD for 12 weeks (C) and n = 11, n = 13, and n = 14, respectively, for LDLR−/−, LDLR−/−/ERK1−/−, or LDLR−/−/STAT1 S727A mice fed HFD for 24 weeks (D)]. Statistical analysis was performed using a one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test on log‐transformed data (*p ≤ .05; **p ≤ .01)
FIGURE 8The effect of ERK1 deficiency and STAT1 S727A modification on the smooth muscle cell content of plaques. LDLR−/−, LDLR−/−/ERK1−/−, or LDLR−/−/STAT1 S727A mice were fed HFD for 12 or 24 weeks (A, C and B, D, respectively). Sections of the aortic root were stained for smooth muscle cell content. Representative images are shown in panels A‐B (5× magnification and scale bar of 400 μm). The graphs show mean ± SEM of smooth muscle cell content within the plaque [n = 10, n = 9, and n = 11 respectively, for LDLR−/−, LDLR−/−/ERK1−/−, or LDLR−/−/STAT1 S727A mice fed HFD for 12 weeks (C) and n = 13, n = 12, and n = 14, respectively, for LDLR−/−, LDLR−/−/ERK1−/−, or LDLR−/−/STAT1 S727A mice fed HFD for 24 weeks (D)]. Statistical analysis was performed using a one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test
Plasma cytokine levels in LDLR−/−, LDLR−/−/ERK1−/− and LDLR−/−/STAT1 S727A mice following feeding of HFD for 12 weeks
| Cytokine | LDLR−/−(pg/ml) |
| LDLR−/−/ERK1−/−(pg/ml) |
| Change | LDLR−/−/STAT1 S727A (pg/ml) |
| Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL‐1β | 1.25 ± 0.50 | 11 | 0.51 ± 0.15 | 6 | NS | 0.54 ± 0.14 | 5 | NS |
| IL‐2 | 1.16 ± 0.06 | 14 | 1.06 ± 0.06 | 10 | NS | 1.42 ± 0.09 | 12 | ↑ ( |
| IL‐4 | 0.35 ± 0.13 | 7 | 0.54 ± 0.28 | 3 | NS | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 2 | NS |
| IL‐5 | 3.35 ± 0.26 | 14 | 2.65 ± 0.20 | 10 | NS | 7.58 ± 2.52 | 12 | ↑ ( |
| IL‐6 | 72.55 ± 22.27 | 14 | 42.91 ± 14.41 | 10 | NS | 28.95 ± 4.49 | 11 | NS |
| IFN‐γ | 0.39 ± 0.10 | 14 | 0.42 ± 0.11 | 11 | NS | 0.66 ± 0.09 | 11 | NS |
| KC/GRO | 174.40 ± 18.50 | 15 | 129.50 ± 12.20 | 11 | NS | 155.00 ± 15.00 | 12 | NS |
| TNF‐α | 16.80 ± 2.10 | 15 | 14.27 ± 1.37 | 11 | NS | 13.00 ± 1.00 | 12 | NS |
| IL‐10 | 17.30 ± 1.00 | 15 | 16.59 ± 2.27 | 10 | NS | 19.98 ± 0.90 | 12 | NS |
Significant or trend of increase (↑) are shown with p values in parenthesis. NS, not significant; N, numbers of animals (plasma with undetectable assay readings were removed before statistical analysis).
FIGURE 9Summary of key outcomes from this study. ↑, Increase; ↓, decrease; T, trend toward significance