Literature DB >> 34565898

Conscientious Objection, Not Refusal: The Power of a Word.

Cynthia Jones-Nosacek1.   

Abstract

Conscientious objection (CO) in medicine grew out of the need to protect healthcare providers who objected to performing abortions after the Roe v. Wade decision in the 1970s which has since over time expanded to include sterilization, contraception, in vitro fertilization, stem cell research, and end-of-life issues. Since 2006, there has been a growing amount of published literature arguing for the denial of CO. Over the last three years, there has also been an increase in calling this conscientious refusal. This article will argue that the term conscientious objection is more accurate than conscientious refusal because those who object are not refusing to provide care. CO also emphasizes that there are reasoned arguments behind one's decision not to perform certain actions because of one's own principles and values.
SUMMARY: How something is presented matters. Objection emphasizes the thought behind the action while refusal gives the impression that medical care is not given. © Catholic Medical Association 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics; Catholic identity in health care; Conscience in medicine; Conscientious objection; Conscientious refusal; Ethics

Year:  2021        PMID: 34565898      PMCID: PMC8375369          DOI: 10.1177/00243639211008271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Linacre Q        ISSN: 0024-3639


  12 in total

Review 1.  Conscientious objection in medicine.

Authors:  Julian Savulescu
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-04

2.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 385 November 2007: the limits of conscientious refusal in reproductive medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  What is conscience and why is respect for it so important?

Authors:  Daniel P Sulmasy
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2008

4.  Physicians, Not Conscripts - Conscientious Objection in Health Care.

Authors:  Ronit Y Stahl; Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Disentangling Conscience Protections.

Authors:  Nadia N Sawicki
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.683

Review 6.  There is no defence for 'Conscientious objection' in reproductive health care.

Authors:  Christian Fiala; Joyce H Arthur
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2017-07-23       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Civil disobedience, conscientious objection, and evasive noncompliance: a framework for the analysis and assessment of illegal actions in health care.

Authors:  J F Childress
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  1985-02

8.  Physicians' beliefs about conscience in medicine: a national survey.

Authors:  Ryan E Lawrence; Farr A Curlin
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Western bioethics on the Navajo reservation. Benefit or harm?

Authors:  J A Carrese; L A Rhodes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-09-13       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning.

Authors:  Paul H Thibodeau; Lera Boroditsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  The ERDs: Part One - The Social Mission of Catholic Health Care Services.

Authors:  Christine Sybert
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2021-08-13

2.  Referral vs Transfer of Care: Ethical Options When Values Differ.

Authors:  Cynthia Jones-Nosacek
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2021-12-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.