Literature DB >> 34565810

On the Detection of the Correct Number of Factors in Two-Facet Models by Means of Parallel Analysis.

André Beauducel1, Norbert Hilger1.   

Abstract

Methods for optimal factor rotation of two-facet loading matrices have recently been proposed. However, the problem of the correct number of factors to retain for rotation of two-facet loading matrices has rarely been addressed in the context of exploratory factor analysis. Most previous studies were based on the observation that two-facet loading matrices may be rank deficient when the salient loadings of each factor have the same sign. It was shown here that full-rank two-facet loading matrices are, in principle, possible, when some factors have positive and negative salient loadings. Accordingly, the current simulation study on the number of factors to extract for two-facet models was based on rank-deficient and full-rank two-facet population models. The number of factors to extract was estimated from traditional parallel analysis based on the mean of the unreduced eigenvalues as well as from nine other rather traditional versions of parallel analysis (based on the 95th percentile of eigenvalues, based on reduced eigenvalues, based on eigenvalue differences). Parallel analysis based on the mean eigenvalues of the correlation matrix with the squared multiple correlations of each variable with the remaining variables inserted in the main diagonal had the highest detection rates for most of the two-facet factor models. Recommendations for the identification of the correct number of factors are based on the simulation results, on the results of an empirical example data set, and on the conditions for approximately rank-deficient and full-rank two-facet models.
© The Author(s) 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  exploratory factor analysis; facet model; parallel analysis

Year:  2021        PMID: 34565810      PMCID: PMC8377342          DOI: 10.1177/0013164420982057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0013-1644            Impact factor:   3.088


  12 in total

1.  Separating trait effects from trait-specific method effects in multitrait-multimethod models: a multiple-indicator CT-C(M-1) model.

Authors:  Michael Eid; Tanja Lischetzke; Fridtjof W Nussbeck; Lisa I Trierweiler
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2003-03

2.  Factors and factors of personality.

Authors:  J P Guilford
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  A RATIONALE AND TEST FOR THE NUMBER OF FACTORS IN FACTOR ANALYSIS.

Authors:  J L HORN
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1965-06       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.

Authors:  D T CAMPBELL; D W FISKE
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1959-03       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Remarks on Parallel Analysis.

Authors:  A Buja; N Eyuboglu
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1992-10-01       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.

Authors:  R B Cattell
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1966-04-01       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Determining the number of factors using parallel analysis and its recent variants.

Authors:  Sangdon Lim; Seungmin Jahng
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2019-06-10

8.  Tandem criteria for analytic rotation in factor analysis.

Authors:  A L Comrey
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1967-06       Impact factor: 2.500

9.  How to determine the number of factors to retain in exploratory factor analysis: A comparison of extraction methods under realistic conditions.

Authors:  Max Auerswald; Morten Moshagen
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2019-01-21
View more
  1 in total

1.  Factor Retention Using Machine Learning With Ordinal Data.

Authors:  David Goretzko; Markus Bühner
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2022-05-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.