Xiaotian Li1, Fangjie Xia2, Lihua Chen3, Xiaodong Zhang3, Chunbai Mo4, Wen Shen3. 1. School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China. 2. Department of Radiology, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China. 3. Department of Radiology, Tianjin First Center Hospital, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China. 4. Department of Kidney Transplantation, Tianjin First Center Hospital, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The study was to investigate the feasibility and accuracy of assessment for living renal donors before transplantation by using 3.0 T non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (NCE-MRA). METHODS: 30 renal donors were investigated and underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA) and 3.0 T NCE-MRA before nephrectomy. Two radiologists independently assessed arterial and venous anatomy and potential kidney lesions. The image quality score, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), diameters and lengths of renal arteries and veins were compared between CTA and NCE-MRA. Imaging findings were compared with the surgical results served as reference standard. Agreement was assessed using κ test. The Wilcoxon test and paired sample t test were used for statistically significant differences. RESULTS: The results of image quality score for renal arteries and veins were highly consistent between the two radiologists in NCE-MRA (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the scores of renal arterial and venous branches between NCE-MRA and CTA (p > 0.05). The SNR and CNR of renal vessels were higher than CTA (p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the length of renal vessels measured by the two methods (p > 0.05), and the diameter was smaller than that of CTA (p < 0.05). The detection of normal renal arteries and early branches by both examination techniques was consistent with intraoperative findings. Both methods showed good consistency between the anatomical variation of renal vein and the intraoperative diagnosis (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: 3.0 T NCE-MRA can be used for evaluation of main renal arteries and veins with high accuracy for anatomy and variation classification, and can be used for pre-operative vascular evaluation of living donor kidney transplantation. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: 3.0 T NCE-MRA can be used for evaluation of main renal arteries and veins with high accuracy for anatomy and variation classification, and can be used for pre-operative vascular evaluation of living donor kidney transplantation.
OBJECTIVE: The study was to investigate the feasibility and accuracy of assessment for living renal donors before transplantation by using 3.0 T non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (NCE-MRA). METHODS: 30 renal donors were investigated and underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA) and 3.0 T NCE-MRA before nephrectomy. Two radiologists independently assessed arterial and venous anatomy and potential kidney lesions. The image quality score, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), diameters and lengths of renal arteries and veins were compared between CTA and NCE-MRA. Imaging findings were compared with the surgical results served as reference standard. Agreement was assessed using κ test. The Wilcoxon test and paired sample t test were used for statistically significant differences. RESULTS: The results of image quality score for renal arteries and veins were highly consistent between the two radiologists in NCE-MRA (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the scores of renal arterial and venous branches between NCE-MRA and CTA (p > 0.05). The SNR and CNR of renal vessels were higher than CTA (p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the length of renal vessels measured by the two methods (p > 0.05), and the diameter was smaller than that of CTA (p < 0.05). The detection of normal renal arteries and early branches by both examination techniques was consistent with intraoperative findings. Both methods showed good consistency between the anatomical variation of renal vein and the intraoperative diagnosis (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: 3.0 T NCE-MRA can be used for evaluation of main renal arteries and veins with high accuracy for anatomy and variation classification, and can be used for pre-operative vascular evaluation of living donor kidney transplantation. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: 3.0 T NCE-MRA can be used for evaluation of main renal arteries and veins with high accuracy for anatomy and variation classification, and can be used for pre-operative vascular evaluation of living donor kidney transplantation.
Authors: I Laurence; B Ariff; R A Quest; S Moser; A Glover; D Taube; P Gishen; V Papalois; C Juli Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2012-01-17 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Florian Berger; Rahel A Kubik-Huch; Tilo Niemann; Hans Ruedi Schmid; Michael Poetzsch; Johannes M Froehlich; Jürg H Beer; Michael J Thali; Thomas Kraemer Journal: Radiology Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Enrique Lopez Hänninen; Timm Denecke; Lars Stelter; Maciej Pech; Petr Podrabsky; Johann Pratschke; Jens Ricke; Ralf Schindler; Peter Neuhaus; Ronald Felix; Stefan G Tullius; Stefen G Tullius Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 3.782
Authors: T A Bley; C J François; M L Schiebler; O Wieben; N Takei; J H Brittain; A Munoz Del Rio; T M Grist; S B Reeder Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-05-28 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Mittul Gulati; Harout Dermendjian; Ana M Gómez; Nelly Tan; Daniel J Margolis; David S Lu; H Albin Gritsch; Steven S Raman Journal: Clin Imaging Date: 2016-01-23 Impact factor: 1.605