Hai Chen1,2, Xianquan Xu2, Tengfei Ge3, Congshu Hua4, Xiaodong Zhu2, Qikui Wang2, Zaicheng Yu1, Renquan Zhang1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Anhui Chest Hospital, Hefei, People's Republic of China. 3. The Third Department of Thoracic Surgery, Anhui Chest Hospital, Hefei, People's Republic of China. 4. The First Department of Thoracic Surgery, Anhui Chest Hospital, Hefei, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence and cancer-specific death rate of lung cancer (LC) have risen in recent decades. A universally applicable prognostic signature for both adenocarcinoma LC (LUAD) and squamous cell carcinoma LC (LUSC) is still lacking. METHODS: A total of 453 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-LUAD cohort and 452 patients from TCGA-LUSC cohort were enrolled, and a prognostic model was constructed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis based on the consensus prognostic genes in both cohorts. The newly defined pan-lung cancer risk count (PLCRC) of each patient was calculated via the summation formula. RESULTS: A total of 23 genes were selected for the calculation of the PLCRC. The PLCRC showed a moderate prognostic value in the entire (p < 0.001, HR: 2.75, AUC: 0.643), LUAD (p < 0.001, HR: 2.51, AUC: 0.636) and LUSC (p < 0.001, HR: 2.89, AUC: 0.656) cohorts. The PLCRC was an independent prognostic factor after adjusting the clinical features. The PLCRC was also effective in nine external validation cohorts and in patients with different clinical features. Activation of extracellular matrix pathways and infiltration of immunocytes promoted the tumorigenesis and development of both LUAD and LUSC. We generated a universally applicable prognostic signature, the PLCRC, which could dichotomize patients with significantly different clinical outcomes and guide the clinical treatment of LC patients. Chemotherapy is more suitable for patients with a low PLCRC, while anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 immunotherapy is more suitable for patients with a high PLCRC. CONCLUSION: We established and validated a newly defined prognostic signature, the PLCRC, for both LUAD and LUSC patients and provided clinical strategies for patients from different risk subgroups.
BACKGROUND: The prevalence and cancer-specific death rate of lung cancer (LC) have risen in recent decades. A universally applicable prognostic signature for both adenocarcinoma LC (LUAD) and squamous cell carcinoma LC (LUSC) is still lacking. METHODS: A total of 453 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-LUAD cohort and 452 patients from TCGA-LUSC cohort were enrolled, and a prognostic model was constructed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis based on the consensus prognostic genes in both cohorts. The newly defined pan-lung cancer risk count (PLCRC) of each patient was calculated via the summation formula. RESULTS: A total of 23 genes were selected for the calculation of the PLCRC. The PLCRC showed a moderate prognostic value in the entire (p < 0.001, HR: 2.75, AUC: 0.643), LUAD (p < 0.001, HR: 2.51, AUC: 0.636) and LUSC (p < 0.001, HR: 2.89, AUC: 0.656) cohorts. The PLCRC was an independent prognostic factor after adjusting the clinical features. The PLCRC was also effective in nine external validation cohorts and in patients with different clinical features. Activation of extracellular matrix pathways and infiltration of immunocytes promoted the tumorigenesis and development of both LUAD and LUSC. We generated a universally applicable prognostic signature, the PLCRC, which could dichotomize patients with significantly different clinical outcomes and guide the clinical treatment of LC patients. Chemotherapy is more suitable for patients with a low PLCRC, while anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 immunotherapy is more suitable for patients with a high PLCRC. CONCLUSION: We established and validated a newly defined prognostic signature, the PLCRC, for both LUAD and LUSC patients and provided clinical strategies for patients from different risk subgroups.
Authors: Kristin Bergethon; Alice T Shaw; Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou; Ryohei Katayama; Christine M Lovly; Nerina T McDonald; Pierre P Massion; Christina Siwak-Tapp; Adriana Gonzalez; Rong Fang; Eugene J Mark; Julie M Batten; Haiquan Chen; Keith D Wilner; Eunice L Kwak; Jeffrey W Clark; David P Carbone; Hongbin Ji; Jeffrey A Engelman; Mari Mino-Kenudson; William Pao; A John Iafrate Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-01-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Keunchil Park; Eng-Huat Tan; Ken O'Byrne; Li Zhang; Michael Boyer; Tony Mok; Vera Hirsh; James Chih-Hsin Yang; Ki Hyeong Lee; Shun Lu; Yuankai Shi; Sang-We Kim; Janessa Laskin; Dong-Wan Kim; Catherine Dubos Arvis; Karl Kölbeck; Scott A Laurie; Chun-Ming Tsai; Mehdi Shahidi; Miyoung Kim; Dan Massey; Victoria Zazulina; Luis Paz-Ares Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2016-04-12 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Pasi A Jänne; Alice T Shaw; José Rodrigues Pereira; Gaëlle Jeannin; Johan Vansteenkiste; Carlos Barrios; Fabio Andre Franke; Lynda Grinsted; Victoria Zazulina; Paul Smith; Ian Smith; Lucio Crinò Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2012-11-28 Impact factor: 41.316