| Literature DB >> 34556783 |
Paulina Pruszkowska-Przybylska1, Magdalena Kobus2, Aleksandra Iljin3, Joanna A Wiktorska4, Elżbieta Żądzińska2,5, Aneta Sitek2.
Abstract
The association between second to fourth finger ratio and thyroid diseases is unexplained. There is a possible interaction between prenatal exposition to sex hormone and thyroid functions in the adulthood. The study included 175 adults investigated in Łódź in the central Poland. It consisted of two main parts: a survey including questions about occurrence of thyroid gland dysfunction and anthropometric measurements (body mass and height and length of the second and fourth finger, waist and hip circumferences). The women who had thyroid disease had higher 2D:4D digit ratio (left hand) (mean = 1.004; SD = 0.036) than healthy ones (mean = 0.989; SD = 0.030) (t = - 2105; p = 0.038; d = 0.707). The association between thyroid diseases occurrence and prenatal steroid hormone exposition is noticed. Only females who had thyroid diseases tend to have higher 2D:4D digit ratio, for left hand.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34556783 PMCID: PMC8460635 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98436-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Differences in age, BMI, 2D:4D (R) and 2D:4D (L) between females and males.
| Sex | Variables for individuals who had not thyroid diseases | T | d | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Means | N | SD | Q25 | Median | Q75 | ||||
| Females | 51.159 | 69 | 12.582 | 43.000 | 49.000 | 60.000 | 0.435 | 0.664 | 0.073 |
| Males | 50.188 | 69 | 13.905 | 38.000 | 47.000 | 61.000 | |||
| Females | 1.034 | 69 | 0.008 | 1.030 | 1.033 | 1.038 | − 3.640 | 0.625 | |
| Males | 1.039 | 69 | 0.008 | 1.033 | 1.038 | 1.043 | |||
| Females | 0.925 | 69 | 0.062 | 0.880 | 0.920 | 0.960 | − 2.440 | 0.420 | |
| Males | 0.958 | 69 | 0.092 | 0.890 | 0.960 | 1.020 | |||
| Females | 0.980 | 69 | 0.033 | 0.958 | 0.986 | 1.000 | 0.862 | 0.390 | 0.147 |
| Males | 0.975 | 69 | 0.035 | 0.951 | 0.974 | 1.000 | |||
| Females | 0.989 | 69 | 0.030 | 0.971 | 0.986 | 1.014 | 1.694 | 0.093 | 0.295 |
| Males | 0.980 | 69 | 0.031 | 0.963 | 0.986 | 1.000 | |||
Bold indicates statistically significant results (p < 0.05).
Frequency distribution among investigated individuals in the BMI categories.
| BMI WHO categories | Sex | Lack of thyroid diseases N (%) | Thyroid diseases N (%) | Row | Chi2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Underweight | Female | 1 (1.14) | 0 | 1 | – | – |
| Male | 1 (1.14) | 0 | 1 | |||
| Total | 2 | 0 | 2 | |||
| Normal weight | Female | 40 (57.97) | 12 (37.50) | 52 | 2.715 | 0.099 |
| Male | 17 (24.64) | 1 (20.00) | 18 | |||
| Total | 57 | 13 | 70 | |||
| Overweight | Female | 20 (28.99) | 12 (37.50) | 32 | 8.713 | |
| Male | 34 (49.28) | 3 (60.00) | 37 | |||
| Total | 54 | 15 | 69 | |||
| Obese | Female | 8 (11.59) | 8 (25.00) | 16 | 8.597 | |
| Male | 17 (24.64) | 1 (20.00) | 18 | |||
| Total | 25 | 9 | 34 | |||
| Column total | 138 | 37 | 175 |
Bold indicates statistically significant results (p < 0.05).
Frequency differences between investigated individuals who reported and those who did not report thyroid diseases in the 2D:4D digit ratio categories (below 1—male pattern, above or equal 1—female pattern) for the both hands.
| Sex | Thyroid diseases N | 2D4D (R) < 1 | 2D4D (R) > = 1 | Row | Chi2 | OR | CI (95%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | No | 42 (24.00) | 27 (15.43) | 69 (39.43) | 0.025 | 0.876 | 0.933 | 0.394 | 2.214 |
| Yes | 20 (11.43) | 12 (6.86) | 32 (18.29) | ||||||
| Total | 62 (35.43) | 39 (22.29) | 101 (57.71) | ||||||
| Male | No | 48 (27.43) | 21 (12.00) | 69 (39.43) | 0.243 | 0.622 | 0.571 | 0.061 | 5.424 |
| Yes | 4 (2.29) | 1 (0.57) | 5 (2.86) | ||||||
| Total | 52 (29.71) | (12.57) | 74 (42.29) | ||||||
| Column total | 114 (65.14) | 61 (34.86) | 175 | ||||||
Association between age, BMI, WHR versus 2D:4D finger ratio for both hands separately for healthy and ill man and women.
| Pair of variables | Females without thyroid diseases N = 69 | Males without thyroid diseases N = 69 | Females with thyroid diseases N = 32 | Males with thyroid diseases N = 5 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spearman R | Spearman R | Spearman R | Spearman R | |||||
| BMI box cox & WHR | 0.811 | 0.819 | 0.749 | 0.900 | ||||
| BMI box cox & 2D4D P | 0.047 | 0.701 | − 0.099 | 0.420 | 0.133 | 0.469 | − 0.400 | 0.505 |
| BMI box cox & 2D4D L | 0.018 | 0.883 | − 0.037 | 0.761 | 0.108 | 0.558 | − 0.900 | |
| BMI box cox & Age | 0.470 | 0.120 | 0.325 | 0.266 | 0.141 | 0.300 | 0.624 | |
| WHR & 2D4D P | 0.013 | 0.918 | − 0.112 | 0.360 | − 0.015 | 0.939 | − 0.700 | 0.188 |
| WHR & 2D4D L | − 0.031 | 0.803 | − 0.065 | 0.593 | 0.048 | 0.801 | − 0.800 | 0.104 |
| WHR & Age | 0.422 | 0.168 | 0.169 | 0.202 | 0.284 | 0.500 | 0.391 | |
| 2D4D P & 2D4D L | 0.653 | 0.404 | 0.435 | 0.300 | 0.624 | |||
| 2D4D P & Age | 0.137 | 0.261 | − 0.167 | 0.170 | − 0.259 | 0.152 | − 0.900 | |
| 2D4D L & BMI box cox | 0.018 | 0.883 | − 0.037 | 0.761 | 0.108 | 0.558 | − 0.900 | |
| 2D4D L & Age | 0.027 | 0.823 | 0.025 | 0.839 | 0.030 | 0.872 | − 0.100 | 0.873 |
| Age & 2D4D L | 0.027 | 0.823 | 0.025 | 0.839 | 0.030 | 0.872 | − 0.100 | 0.873 |
Bold indicates statistically significant results (p < 0.05).
Differences in age, BMI, 2D:4D (R), 2D:4D (L) among individuals who had thyroid diseases and healthy one separately for females and males.
| Sex | Thyroid diseases | Variables | t | d | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Means | N | SD | Q25 | Median | Q75 | |||||
| Females | ||||||||||
| No | 51.159 | 69 | 12.582 | 43.000 | 49.000 | 60.000 | − 0.675 | 0.501 | 0.195 | |
| Yes | 52.969 | 32 | 13.094 | 42.500 | 52.000 | 65.000 | ||||
| No | 1.034 | 69 | 0.008 | 1.030 | 1.033 | 1.038 | − 2.594 | 0.470 | ||
| Yes | 1.038 | 32 | 0.009 | 1.031 | 1.038 | 1.044 | ||||
| No | 0.928 | 69 | 0.062 | 0.880 | 0.920 | 0.960 | − 1.601 | 0.113 | 0.572 | |
| Yes | 0.953 | 32 | 0.108 | 0.860 | 0.950 | 1.030 | ||||
| No | 0.980 | 69 | 0.033 | 0.958 | 0.986 | 1.000 | − 0.916 | 0.362 | 0.257 | |
| Yes | 0.986 | 32 | 0.038 | 0.961 | 0.985 | 1.021 | ||||
| No | 0.989 | 69 | 0.030 | 0.971 | 0.986 | 1.014 | − 2.105 | 0.707 | ||
| Yes | 1.004 | 32 | 0.036 | 0.973 | 1.000 | 1.042 | ||||
| Males | ||||||||||
| No | 50.188 | 69 | 13.905 | 38.000 | 47.000 | 61.000 | − 0.868 | 0.388 | 0.389 | |
| Yes | 55.800 | 5 | 14.923 | 45.000 | 47.000 | 70.000 | ||||
| No | 1.039 | 69 | 0.008 | 1.033 | 1.038 | 1.043 | 0.147 | 0.884 | 0.133 | |
| Yes | 1.038 | 5 | 0.007 | 1.034 | 1.041 | 1.042 | ||||
| No | 0.958 | 69 | 0.092 | 0.890 | 0.960 | 1.020 | − 1.188 | 0.239 | 0.605 | |
| Yes | 1.008 | 5 | 0.072 | 0.950 | 1.010 | 1.040 | ||||
| No | 0.975 | 69 | 0.035 | 0.951 | 0.974 | 1.000 | − 0.868 | 0.834 | 0.452 | |
| Yes | 0.956 | 5 | 0.048 | 0.925 | 0.948 | 0.975 | ||||
| No | 0.980 | 69 | 0.031 | 0.963 | 0.986 | 1.000 | 1.114 | 0.269 | 0.088 | |
| Yes | 0.977 | 5 | 0.037 | 0.959 | 0.960 | 1.000 | ||||
Bold indicates statistically significant results (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Differences in 2D:4D (L) among females who had thyroid diseases and healthy ones (t = − 2.105; p = 0.038; d = 0.707).