Literature DB >> 34556400

A Socio-Ecological Approach to Understanding the Perinatal Care Experiences of People with Intellectual and/or Developmental Disabilities in Ontario, Canada.

Momina Khan1, Hilary K Brown2, Yona Lunsky3, Kate Welsh4, Susan M Havercamp5, Laurie Proulx4, Lesley A Tarasoff6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accessible and quality care during the perinatal period is critical for optimal maternal and neonatal health. Using the socio-ecological model, the purpose of this study was to explore barriers and facilitators that shape the perinatal care experiences of people with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (IDD).
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 individuals with IDD in Ontario, Canada, who had given birth within the past 5 years. Interviews focused on care experiences before, during, and after pregnancy. Data were analyzed using a directed content analysis approach, and the socio-ecological model guided analysis.
RESULTS: Barriers at the societal (e.g., cultural norms of motherhood), policy/institutional (e.g., child protection policies and practices), interpersonal (e.g., inadequate formal and informal support), and intrapersonal levels (e.g., internalized stigma) contributed to participants having negative perinatal care experiences. Conversely, we identified facilitators on the interpersonal level (e.g., positive interactions with perinatal care providers and familial and social service supports) as positively shaping participants' perinatal care experiences.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings reveal that the perinatal care experiences of people with IDD are shaped by several interrelated factors that largely stem from societal-level barriers, such as dominant (stigmatizing) discourses of disability. To improve the perinatal care experiences of people with IDD, there is a need for interventions at multiple levels. These include the development of policies to support perinatal care for diverse populations and training care providers to enact policies at the institutional and interpersonal levels.
Copyright © 2021 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34556400      PMCID: PMC8595790          DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2021.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Issues        ISSN: 1049-3867


  40 in total

1.  Learning from lives together: medical and social work students' experiences of learning from people with disabilities in the community.

Authors:  E S Anderson; R Smith; L N Thorpe
Journal:  Health Soc Care Community       Date:  2010-05

2.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

Review 3.  'Weighing up and balancing out': a meta-synthesis of barriers to antenatal care for marginalised women in high-income countries.

Authors:  S Downe; K Finlayson; D Walsh; T Lavender
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Primary care of adults with developmental disabilities in Ontario.

Authors:  Yona Lunsky; Robert S Balogh; Virginie Cobigo; Barry Isaacs; Elizabeth Lin; Hélène M J Ouellette-Kuntz
Journal:  Healthc Q       Date:  2014

5.  Evolving views of disability and public health: the roles of advocacy and public health.

Authors:  Gloria Krahn; Vincent A Campbell
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.554

Review 6.  Review of gynecologic and reproductive care for women with developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Dara Abells; Yolanda A Kirkham; Melanie P Ornstein
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.927

7.  Health characteristics of reproductive-aged autistic women in Ontario: A population-based, cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ami Tint; Hilary K Brown; Simon Chen; Meng-Chuan Lai; Lesley A Tarasoff; Simone N Vigod; Susan Parish; Susan M Havercamp; Yona Lunsky
Journal:  Autism       Date:  2021-01-19

8.  Pregnancy outcomes in women with autism: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Heléne Ek Sundelin; Olof Stephansson; Christina M Hultman; Jonas F Ludvigsson
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 4.790

9.  A longitudinal study of women's memories of their childbirth experiences at five years postpartum.

Authors:  Kenji Takehara; Makiko Noguchi; Takuya Shimane; Chizuru Misago
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Pregnancy complications and maternal birth outcomes in women with intellectual and developmental disabilities in Wisconsin Medicaid.

Authors:  Eric Rubenstein; Deborah B Ehrenthal; David C Mallinson; Lauren Bishop; Hsiang-Huo Kuo; Maureen Durkin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.752

View more
  2 in total

1.  Improved Obstetric Care for People with Disabilities: An Urgent Call for Accessibility and Inclusion.

Authors:  Hilary K Brown; Monika Mitra
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 3.017

2.  Barriers to and facilitators of effective communication in perinatal care: a qualitative study of the experiences of birthing people with sensory, intellectual, and/or developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Gul Saeed; Hilary K Brown; Yona Lunsky; Kate Welsh; Laurie Proulx; Susan Havercamp; Lesley A Tarasoff
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 3.105

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.