| Literature DB >> 34556101 |
Grazia Savini1, Francesca Scolari1,2, Lino Ometto1, Omar Rota-Stabelli3,4, Davide Carraretto1, Ludvik M Gomulski1, Giuliano Gasperi1, Adly M M Abd-Alla5, Serap Aksoy6, Geoffrey M Attardo7, Anna R Malacrida8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Glossina species (tsetse flies), the sole vectors of African trypanosomes, maintained along their long evolutionary history a unique reproductive strategy, adenotrophic viviparity. Viviparity reduces their reproductive rate and, as such, imposes strong selective pressures on males for reproductive success. These species live in sub-Saharan Africa, where the distributions of the main sub-genera Fusca, Morsitans, and Palpalis are restricted to forest, savannah, and riverine habitats, respectively. Here we aim at identifying the evolutionary patterns of the male reproductive genes of six species belonging to these three main sub-genera. We then interpreted the different patterns we found across the species in the light of viviparity and the specific habitat restrictions, which are known to shape reproductive behavior.Entities:
Keywords: Glossina; Habitat; Male accessory gland genes; Selective pressure; Testis genes; Viviparity
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34556101 PMCID: PMC8461966 DOI: 10.1186/s12915-021-01148-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Biol ISSN: 1741-7007 Impact factor: 7.431
Fig. 1Genome-scaled phylogeny and divergence estimates. Bayesian consensus tree inferred on a dataset of 478,000 nucleotides by PhyloBayes using relaxed clocks and node/fossil constraints. Numbers at nodes are main divergence estimates and 95% High Posterior Densities, HPD (in parentheses) expressed in millions of years. Bars are the 95% HPD. All nodes received full support (100 Bootstrap support and 1.00 posterior probabilities, PP) in a Maximum Likelihood (RAxML) and Bayesian (PhyloBayes) analysis, except for the split of M. domestica from Glossina which had a PP of 0.96
Fig. 2Evolution of TSTGs and MAGGs orthologs on the Glossina phylogeny. Number of genes orthologous to G. m. morsitans TSTGs and MAGGs for all considered Glossina species
Fig. 3Mean d/d ratio for tsetse genes grouped according to GO functional categories. GO functional categories (Molecular Function Level III) are reported for MAGGs and TSTGs (red and orange bars, respectively). Notched box plots show medians and extend to the first and third quartiles. Only categories with at least two members are shown. Numbers of genes assigned to each class is reported above the box plots
Fig. 4Consensus evolutionary analysis of orthologous genes in the six Glossina species. Upper and lower are the trees derived from analyses of nonsynonymous (d) and synonymous (d) substitutions, respectively. MAGGs, TSTGs, and “all genes” are represented (from left to right). The d/d for each species is given in parentheses
Fig. 5Selection rate in the different lineages. Rate of positively selected genes (n candidates/mya): bars are number of candidate genes (identified using branch and/or branch-site codon substitution model tests in PAML) per million years (based on time tree) in each of the Glossina terminal branches
Fig. 6Reproductive genes under selective pressure in the Glossina lineages. Numbers of unique and shared candidates for TSTGs (A) and MAGGs (B) are reported. Among these groups, genes found to encode spermatophore proteins in G. m. morsitans (29) are indicated in boxes and labelled with an (S). In brackets, the novel tsetse protein-coding genes (NTP) are indicated. Species belonging to the Morsitans and Palpalis species group are indicated in blue and red, respectively