Literature DB >> 34554536

Does offspring sex ratio differ between urban and forest populations of great tits (Parus major)?

Nóra Ágh1, Ivett Pipoly2, Krisztián Szabó3, Ernő Vincze2, Veronika Bókony4, Gábor Seress2, András Liker2.   

Abstract

Since male and female offspring may have different costs and benefits, parents may use sex ratio adjustment to increase their own fitness under different environmental conditions. Urban habitats provide poorer conditions for nestling development in many birds. Therefore, we investigated whether great tits (Parus major) produce different brood sex ratios in urban and natural habitats. We determined the sex of nestlings of 126 broods in two urban and two forest sites between 2012 and 2014 by molecular sexing. We found that brood sex ratio did not differ significantly between urban and forest habitats either at egg-laying or near fledging. Male offspring were larger than females in both habitats. This latter result suggests that male offspring may be more costly to raise than females, yet our findings suggest that urban great tits do not produce more daughters despite the unfavourable breeding conditions. This raises the possibility that other aspects of urban life, such as better post-fledging survival, might favour males and thereby compensate for the extra energetic costs of producing male offspring.
© 2020. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brood sex ratio; Sex-dependent mortality; Sexual size dimorphism; Tarsus length; Urbanization

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 34554536     DOI: 10.1007/s42977-020-00024-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Futur        ISSN: 2676-8607


  10 in total

1.  Evolution. The benefits of allocating sex.

Authors:  S A West; E A Herre; B C Sheldon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Facultative adjustment of the offspring sex ratio and male attractiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Isobel Booksmythe; Brian Mautz; Jacqueline Davis; Shinichi Nakagawa; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2015-09-25

3.  Mortality costs of sexual selection and parental care in natural populations of birds.

Authors:  András Liker; Tamás Székely
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Sex and environmental sensitivity in blue tit nestlings.

Authors:  Lars Råberg; Martin Stjernman; Jan-Ake Nilsson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  SEX-RATIO MANIPULATION IN COLOR-BANDED POPULATIONS OF ZEBRA FINCHES.

Authors:  Nancy Burley
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 6.  A review of urban impacts on avian life-history evolution: Does city living lead to slower pace of life?

Authors:  Tuul Sepp; Kevin J McGraw; Ants Kaasik; Mathieu Giraudeau
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 10.863

7.  Impact of urbanization on abundance and phenology of caterpillars and consequences for breeding in an insectivorous bird.

Authors:  Gábor Seress; Tamás Hammer; Veronika Bókony; Ernő Vincze; Bálint Preiszner; Ivett Pipoly; Csenge Sinkovics; Karl L Evans; András Liker
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.657

8.  Sex ratio manipulation and selection for attractiveness.

Authors:  N Burley
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-02-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Sex-biased breeding dispersal is predicted by social environment in birds.

Authors:  Zsolt Végvári; Gergely Katona; Balázs Vági; Robert P Freckleton; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Tamás Székely; András Liker
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.