Literature DB >> 15965752

Sex and environmental sensitivity in blue tit nestlings.

Lars Råberg1, Martin Stjernman, Jan-Ake Nilsson.   

Abstract

In birds and mammals with sexual size dimorphism (SSD), the larger sex is typically more sensitive to adverse environmental conditions, such as food shortage, during ontogeny. However, some recent studies of altricial birds have found that the larger sex is less sensitive, apparently because large size renders an advantage in sibling competition. Still, this effect is not an inevitable outcome of sibling competition, because several studies of other species of altricial birds have found the traditional pattern. We investigated if the sexes differ in environmental sensitivity during ontogeny in the blue tit, a small altricial bird with c. 6% SSD in body mass (males larger than females). We performed a cross-fostering and brood size manipulation experiment during 2 years to investigate if the sexes were differently affected as regards body size (body mass, tarsus and wing length on day 14 after hatching) and pre-fledging survival. We also investigated if the relationship between body size and post-fledging survival differed between the sexes. Pre-fledging mortality was higher in enlarged than in reduced broods, representing poor and good environments, respectively, but the brood size manipulation did not affect the mortality rate of males and females differently. In both years, both males and females were smaller on day 14 after hatching in enlarged as compared to reduced broods. In one of the years, we also found significant Sex x Experiment interactions for body size, such that females were more affected by poor environmental conditions than that of males. Body size was positively correlated with post-fledging survival, but we found no interactive effects of sex and morphological traits on survival. We conclude that in the blue tit, females (the smaller sex) are more sensitive to adverse environmental conditions which, in our study, was manifest in terms of fledgling size. A review of published studies of sex differences in environmental sensitivity in sexually size-dimorphic altricial birds suggests that the smaller sex is more sensitive than the larger sex in species with large brood size and vice versa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15965752     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-005-0133-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

1.  Gender and viability selection on morphology in fledgling pied flycatchers.

Authors:  J Potti; J A Dávila; J L Tella; O Frías; S Villar
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Offspring sex ratio in red-winged blackbirds is dependent on maternal age.

Authors:  J L Blank; V Nolan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A DNA test to sex most birds.

Authors:  R Griffiths; M C Double; K Orr; R J Dawson
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Visualizing and quantifying natural selection.

Authors:  E D Brodie; A J Moore; F J Janzen
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring.

Authors:  R L Trivers; D E Willard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Interaction between maternal effects: onset of incubation and offspring sex in two populations of a passerine bird.

Authors:  Alexander V Badyaev; Geoffrey E Hill; Michelle L Beck
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-03-04       Impact factor: 3.225

  6 in total
  15 in total

1.  Long-term effects of manipulated natal brood size on metabolic rate in zebra finches.

Authors:  Simon Verhulst; Marie-Jeanne Holveck; Katharina Riebel
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Sex-specific development of cell-mediated immunity under experimentally altered rearing conditions in blue tit nestlings.

Authors:  Anna Dubiec; Mariusz Cichoń; Kinga Deptuch
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Metal pollution does not bias offspring sex ratio in great tit (Parus major).

Authors:  Tapio Eeva; Saila Sillanpää; Esa Lehikoinen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Negative impact of urban habitat on immunity in the great tit Parus major.

Authors:  Juliette Bailly; Renaud Scheifler; Marie Belvalette; Stéphane Garnier; Elena Boissier; Valérie-Anne Clément-Demange; Maud Gète; Matthieu Leblond; Baptiste Pasteur; Quentin Piget; Mickaël Sage; Bruno Faivre
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Does offspring sex ratio differ between urban and forest populations of great tits (Parus major)?

Authors:  Nóra Ágh; Ivett Pipoly; Krisztián Szabó; Ernő Vincze; Veronika Bókony; Gábor Seress; András Liker
Journal:  Biol Futur       Date:  2020-06-25

6.  Catch-up growth in Japanese quail (Coturnix Japonica): relationships with food intake, metabolic rate and sex.

Authors:  Eunice H Chin; Andrea L Storm-Suke; Ryan J Kelly; Gary Burness
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 2.200

7.  Male-biased brood sex ratio depresses average phenotypic quality of barn swallow nestlings under experimentally harsh conditions.

Authors:  Nicola Saino; Rosa Mary de Ayala; Roberta Martinelli; Giuseppe Boncoraglio
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Aggressive behavior of the male parent predicts brood sex ratio in a songbird.

Authors:  Eszter Szász; László Zsolt Garamszegi; Gergely Hegyi; Eszter Szöllősi; Gábor Markó; János Török; Balázs Rosivall
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-06-29

9.  Impacts of parasites in early life: contrasting effects on juvenile growth for different family members.

Authors:  Thomas E Reed; Francis Daunt; Adam J Kiploks; Sarah J Burthe; Hanna M V Granroth-Wilding; Emi A Takahashi; Mark Newell; Sarah Wanless; Emma J A Cunningham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Logging affects fledgling sex ratios and baseline corticosterone in a forest songbird.

Authors:  Rhiannon Leshyk; Erica Nol; Dawn M Burke; Gary Burness
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.