| Literature DB >> 34553791 |
Mikhail Feofanov1,2, Vladimir Akhmetov2, Konstantin Amsharov1,2.
Abstract
Herein, we report a new method for synthesis of extended perylenes and terrylenes. The technique is based on the cascade dehydrative π-extensions (DPEX) of aryl aldehydes, in which stepwise annulations activate previously "dormant" substituents. Two- and fourfold cyclizations of 3-aryl-biphenyl-2,2'-dicarbaldehydes offer a rapid path to unsymmetrical perylenes and elusive terrylene derivatives, respectively. DPEX of 3,3''-(phenanthrene-1,8-diyl)bis (([1,1'-biphenyl]-2,2'-dicarbaldehyde)) leads to the biradical structure, which proceeds in situ into oxidative electrocyclization at room temperature. The described domino process complements and expands DPEX approach to a large family of fused acenes and related PAHs.Entities:
Keywords: domino reactions; perylenes; pi-extension; polycyclic aromatic compounds; terrylenes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34553791 PMCID: PMC9299636 DOI: 10.1002/chem.202103098
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chemistry ISSN: 0947-6539 Impact factor: 5.020
Scheme 1Reported synthesis of terrylene (top) and the synthesis of tribenzo terrylene NG1 (bottom) demonstrating the efficiency of the domino DPEX approach.
Scheme 2a) Synthesis of fused acene demonstrating tolerance towards “misplaced” formyl groups under DPEX conditions. b) Description of Domino DPEX.
Scheme 3Synthesis of extended perylene and terrylenes by a) twofold, and b) fourfold cyclisation. c) Synthesis of NG6 in a fivefold domino‐DPEX accompanied by spontaneous electrocyclization. Conditions of domino‐DPEX: SnCl2, iPrOH, H2SO4, CH2Cl2.
Scheme 4Comparison of two‐ and fourfold Domino‐DPEX explaining the low yield in the case of twofold cyclisation as a result of the formation of highly reactive intermediates.
DFT‐calculated (B3LYP/6‐31+G) and optical HOMO‐LUMO gaps of the obtained NGs.
|
Compound |
DFT HOMO‐LUMO gap [eV] |
Optical gap [eV] |
|---|---|---|
|
NG1 |
1.98 |
1.92 |
|
NG2 |
3.05 |
2.83 |
|
NG3 |
3.10 |
2.87 |
|
NG4 |
2.74 |
2.61 |
|
NG5 |
2.29 |
2.20 |
Figure 1UV/vis spectra of NG1‐NG5. The spectra were recorded in CH2Cl2.