Bare Foot and In-shoe Plantar Pressure in Diabetic Males and Females - Is There Difference?

PURPOSE: High plantar pressure is one of the factors associated with foot ulceration in diabetic patients. High-risk limbs could eventually be identified through this approach. The study was conducted to evaluate the difference in the barefoot and in-shoe plantar pressure among diabetic males and females. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted and purposive sampling was employed for the recruitment of subjects in King Abdullah walking center. The dynamic plantar pressure generated by each subject was recorded using "novel footprint software" and up to five successful trials were collected for each subject of right and left foot.
RESULTS: The mean age of female and male patients was 50.6 ± 13.4 and 46.07 ± 11.17, respectively. The mean difference between the weights was higher in males. The barefoot peak plantar pressure between gender in left limb was found significant. Moreover, the mean difference in plantar pressure at maximum concentration and maximum force of right and left limb between males and females was found statistically significant. The mean difference in in-shoe plantar pressure at maximum force of left limb between males and females was found statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: As the prevalence of diabetes is increasing, the risk of plantar pressure also increasing simultaneously. The difference in plantar pressure among diabetic males and females is critically important as our study indicated that the bare foot and in-shoe plantar pressure was found higher in males than females as males had higher weight than females. Further longitudinal studies are required to be conducted in this context.

Introduction

The occurrence of diabetes mellitus (DM) due to paucity of insulin production or insulin incompetence is commonly found in affecting normal functions of a human body.1 DM is considered the 7th cause of death in the world.2 According to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF), there are 382 million people worldwide with diabetes in 2013.3 IDF expects that the number of people with diabetes will reach 592 million in 2035 (1 in every 10 people will have diabetes).3 The prevalence of diabetes among Saudi population aged 20–79 years is 23.9%.4,5 Saudi Arabia has the highest prevalence of diabetes compared to its neighboring Gulf countries.4,5 Prevalence of diabetes among Saudi Arabia’s population is among the highest around the world, with approximately 2 million people diagnosed with the disease by 2010 and 3.8 million in 2014.6

Plantar pressure is an approach to measure the pressure between support surface and food on a regular basis for locomotor activities. It becomes important to derive such data in gait and posture research to investigate sport biomechanics, injury prevention, footwear design, and lower limb issues.7 Footwear is very important for protecting the feet from excessive pressure and providing stability during walking and other daily activities. Footwear design is very significant for the health of the foot, characteristics of foot varies across race, gender, environment, lifestyle and, therefore, population. These variances should be considered when designing the arch insoles.

Biomechanical impairments are led by diabetic neuropathy, which results in impaired plantar foot pressure.8 Increased risks of foot ulcer among patients are due to neuropathy and foot deformity.8 The occurrence of mostly foot ulcers and injuries is because of clawed toes and metatarsal heads inclined to repetitive increased plantar pressure as well as shear stress.9 Foot supports 95% of the overall body weight and holds the ground force throughout gait.10,11 Impaired sensation in lower extremity is witnessed among 20–50% of diabetic patients,12 which consequently directs toward impaired weight bearing trend on the foot’s plantar surface.13 Foot ulceration is commonly the most repeated cause of amputation among individuals with diabetes.14 More than 85% of diabetes is related with lower extremity amputation.15 Previous studies have reported the increase in dynamic foot pressure, which consequently leads toward the development of diabetic foot ulcer.16–23 The initial standard treatment protocol for diabetic feet encompasses of foot care and proper shoes.2

Plantar insoles are usually utilized in treating musculoskeletal pain and issues in the lower limbs. In particular, scientific findings have reported the prescription of this device for deteriorating plantar pressure, enhancing foot ulcers caused by diabetes, and relieving pain in the lumbar region and lower limbs.24,25 The insole is one of the economical, essential, and practical approaches for reducing and preventing foot ulceration in diabetic patients. Venous blood flow, weight-bearing joints, and inter-vertebral stress were affected through prolonged standing, and thus, cause discomfort and pain as well as worsen musculoskeletal circumstances.26

There are few clinical trials that address the use of and response to insoles in the standing posture in spite of the evidence nature of the issue. Thereby, it is essential to evaluate the effect of insole wearing on the plantar pressure of diabetic patients.27 The use of insoles has been examined by few studies for verifying the reduction of complaints, regardless of relating them with weight-bearing modifications or other mechanical constructs that may demonstrate the modification.37 The effectiveness of this intervention has been assessed in few studies, but none have made comparisons between different insoles in a work environment. In this regard, these gaps in knowledge for interventions intended at static and standing positions should be addressed in symptomatic workers with respect to comparisons of insoles and plantar behaviour found on the market.28,29 Plantar pressure can be influenced by different material density and thickness of the orthopaedic insoles.

According to our extensive literature search, Mickle & Steele’s30 study was the only one to look at the impact of obesity on the plantar pressure distribution, and it found that obese people had considerably higher peak pressure. Obese feet were shown to have a flatter structure and more plantar soft tissue thickness.30 Different body distribution patterns have an impact on plantar pressure. Limited data is available in this regard, therefore we planned this study to observe the mean difference in plantar pressure at peak concentration, maximum concentration and maximum force between diabetic males and females.

Patients and Methods

A cross sectional study was conducted and purposive sampling was employed for the recruitment of subjects in King Abdullah walking center. A total of sixty subjects (30 male; 30 female) were selected. After removing the participant’s shoes and socks, weight was measured by using mechanical scale and dynamic plantar pressure was measured by using a portable platform NOVEL AT - 4 (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Plantar pressure platform.

Information related to persuaders was provided to subjects. Informants were asked to walk straight with head in front of wall regardless of targeting the pressure platform. To ensure repeatability, up to five successful trials were collected for each subject of right and left foot. The dynamic plantar pressure generated by each subject was recorded using “novel footprint software”.

Subjects were given custom made insoles designed and manufactured for each subject using their plantar pressure profile, the insoles were used with appropriate shoes with a Velcro® Dacron-backed closure or laces to fasten the shoe. The first metatarsophalangeal joint was lodged in the widest aspect of the shoe and 1 to 1.25 cm between the end of shoe and the longest toe was allowed.

Data collection commenced with demographic and anthropometric data and information on duration of the diabetic mellitus. A single examiner has performed all the clinical examinations for preserving repeatability and consistency and for avoiding inter-observational differences. The MNSI-q questions were responded by patients, which include common sensory symptoms questions. The system was recommended for comparative differences of plantar pressure distributions under constant calibration and condition before use even though studies indicated that the sensor was sensitive to loading speed, temperature, and surface conditions. The insoles are calibrated to ensure accuracy of measurements.

In different foot areas, peak plantar pressures, plantar pressure at maximum concentration force were recorded in males and females. The subjects walked freely in the department for reproducing their typical gait for approximately 3 minutes prior to executing measurements. Subjects were familiarized with the system when performing several training runs. The study was approved by the institutional review board and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The informed consent was taken from the participants prior to enrollment in the study.

The statistical analysis was performed via IBM SPSS statistical software version 25. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to evaluate the data distribution and found normally distributed. Data was described through means and percentages. Independent t-test was applied to observe the mean difference in males and females. P- value of ≤0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Table 1 presents and summarizes the demographic features of study population. The mean age of female and male patients was 50.6 ± 13.4 and 46.07 ± 11.17, respectively. The mean difference between the weights of both subjects was 10.43 ± 3.3. This shows that male subjects had put more weight as compared to female subjects.

Table 1

Demographic Features of Study Population

Variables	Male	Female
n	30	30
Age	46.07 ± 11.17	50.6 ± 13.4
Weight	87.21 ± 18.90	76.78 ± 15.60

Table 2 presents the bare foot plantar pressure at peak, maximum concentration and maximum force between males and females. The peak plantar pressure between gender in left limb was found significant. Moreover, the mean difference in plantar pressure at maximum concentration and maximum force of right and left limb between males and females was found statistically significant.

Table 2

Barefoot Plantar Pressure in Diabetic Males and Females

Variables	Male	Female	Mean Difference	P-value
E-Med peak plantar pressure
Right Limb	623.67 ± 330.71	636.44 ± 235.39	12.77 ± 95.32	>0.05
Left Limb	554.17 ± 265.71	669.77 ± 221.88	115.6 ± 43.83	<0.05
Plantar pressure at Max. Con. Area (cm2)
Right Limb	158.95 ± 100.75	123.39 ± 16.34	−35.56 ± 84.41	<0.05
Left Limb	157.32 ± 99.75	123.49 ± 16.60	−33.83 ± 83.15	<0.05
Plantar pressure at Max. Force
Right Limb	912.66 ± 363.2	743.66 ± 200.46	−169.56± 162.74	<0.05
Left Limb	908.5 ± 358.24	765.12 ± 155.33	−143.83± 202.91	<0.05

Table 3 presents the in-shoe plantar pressure at peak, maximum concentration and maximum force between males and females. The mean difference in plantar pressure at maximum force of left limb between males and females was found statistically significant.

Table 3

In-shoe Plantar Pressure

Variables	Male	Female	Mean Difference	P-value
In-shoe peak plantar pressure
Right Limb	97.12 ± 17.65	99.03 ± 17.87	1.91 ± 0.22	>0.05
Left Limb	194.65 ± 16.15	197.79± 17.15	3.14 ± 1	>0.05
Plantar pressure at Max. Con. Area (cm2)
Right Limb	75.18 ± 87.55	77.29 ± 71.14	2.11 ± 16.41	>0.05
Left Limb	75.06 ± 86.28	73.50 ± 71.77	−1.56 ± 14.51	>0.05
Plantar pressure at Max. Force
Right Limb	435.027±495.15	427.60±437.73	−7.42 ± 57.42	>0.05
Left Limb	474.69 ± 629.26	456.01±450.95	18.69 ±178.31	<0.05

Discussion

The study was conducted to observe the mean difference in bare foot and in-shoe plantar pressure in diabetic males and females. According to research, 55% of diabetic ulcers occur on the toes, but 22% of all ulcers occur in the forefoot and/or mid foot area.31 In other investigations, abnormal plantar pressure distribution and increased pressure caused ulcerations, notably at the height of the metatarsophalangeal joints,32 and half of the plantar foot ulcers were characterized as being situated under the metatarsal heads and hallux.33

A study discovered a link between plantar pressure and gender, BMI, and age. In general, the authors found no link between gender and plantar pressure distribution, as they observed in the prior study.34 The main difference was that while both males and females had disorders in the forefoot, females had more abnormal plantar pressure in the lateral portion of the foot and mid foot. Hills et al34 also discovered that obese females had higher pressure beneath the mid foot than obese males. In a research, females had higher BMI than men; the authors can only infer that increased body mass causes overload in these locations. However, in our study the barefoot plantar pressure at maximum concentration and force was higher in males than females and in-shoe plantar pressure at maximum force in left limb was also higher in males as in our study the weight of males participants was higher than females.

The overall peak pressures who wore custom-made insoles on the foot soles of the patients were 1.91 ± 0.22 for right limb and 3.14 ± 1 for left limb. A previous study conducted by Ledoux et al35 to report the overall peak pressures among studied subjects. The study has found in-shoe pressure measurement system and additionally witnessed mean peak pressures of 194 kPa for patients irrespective of ulcers.

Diabetes is witnessed to a pressure imbalance between the rear foot and forefoot throughout walking. Higher peak plantar pressure was shown by Mueller et al36 in diabetic patients in the forefoot since skin deteriorates more often in the forefoot as compared to the rear foot throughout barefoot walking. Anterior displacement of weight-bearing was witnessed by Pataky et al38 among diabetic patients. The existence of plantar ulcers was found in forefoot and toe regions. Increased pressure was reported by Zequera et al38 in second toe and metatarsal heads in a small sample size. Additionally, this assessment might be led by neurological modifications such as alternative, motor, and sensorial gait patterns, besides the biomechanical modifications throughout the disease procedure. Similar foot attributes were identified while investigating habitually right and left foot morphology to this study, particularly, wider feet in the toe region, can be reported in barefoot patients.

This study has observed several limitations when explaining the findings from this study. Firstly, subject-specific strike patterns were not taken into consideration specifically for the barefoot population in this study, but this is preliminarily essential for running. In addition, less than 20% of the barefoot population was a forefoot striker throughout the running test, which is uniform with prior reported percentage of forefoot strikes with self-selected speed.

Conclusion

By concluding, a pressure shift was witnessed to the forefoot in diabetic patients. As the prevalence of diabetes is increasing, the risk of plantar pressure also increasing simultaneously. The difference in plantar pressure among diabetic males and females is critically important as our study indicated that the bare foot and in-shoe plantar pressure was found higher in males than females as males had higher weight than females. Further longitudinal studies are required to be conducted in this context.