| Literature DB >> 18501364 |
Todd C Pataky1, Paolo Caravaggi, Russell Savage, Daniel Parker, John Y Goulermas, William I Sellers, Robin H Crompton.
Abstract
This study investigates the relation between walking speed and the distribution of peak plantar pressure and compares a traditional ten-region subsampling (10RS) technique with a new technique: pedobarographic statistical parametric mapping (pSPM). Adapted from cerebral fMRI methodology, pSPM is a digital image processing technique that registers foot pressure images such that homologous structures optimally overlap, thereby enabling statistical tests to be conducted at the pixel level. Following previous experimental protocols, we collected pedobarographic records from 10 subjects walking at three different speeds: slow, normal, and fast. Walking speed was recorded and correlated with the peak pressures extracted from the 10 regions, and subsequently with the peak pixel data extracted after pSPM preprocessing. Both methods revealed significant positive correlation between peak plantar pressure and walking speed over the rearfoot and distal forefoot after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. The 10RS analysis found positive correlation in the midfoot and medial proximal forefoot, but the pixel data exhibited significant negative correlation throughout these regions (p<5x10(-5)). Comparing the statistical maps from the two approaches shows that subsampling may conflate pressure differences evident in pixel-level data, obscuring or even reversing statistical trends. The negative correlation observed in the midfoot implies reduced longitudinal arch collapse with higher walking speeds. We infer that this results from pre- or early-stance phase muscle activity and speculate that preferred walking speed reflects, in part, a balance between the energy required to tighten the longitudinal arch and the apparent propulsive benefits of the stiffened arch.Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18501364 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.03.034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomech ISSN: 0021-9290 Impact factor: 2.712