Literature DB >> 34552002

Reading Proficiency Trends Following Newborn Hearing Screening Implementation.

Christine Yoshinaga-Itano1,2, Craig A Mason3, Mallene Wiggin4, Scott D Grosse5, Marcus Gaffney5, Phillip M Gilley4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate trends in population-level school-aged reading scores among students with hearing loss in an urban Colorado school district after implementation of universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) and Early Hearing Detection and Intervention.
METHODS: The final sample included 1422 assessments conducted during the 2000-2001 through 2013-2014 school years for 321 children with hearing loss in grades 3 through 10. Longitudinal hierarchical linear modeling analyses were used to examine reading proficiency (controlling for birth year, grade in school, free and reduced lunch status, additional disability services, and English not spoken in the home). The Colorado Student Assessment Program was administered to students in third through 10th grades throughout the state. The test years chosen included children born before and after implementation of UNHS.
RESULTS: After implementation of UNHS, significant longitudinal reading proficiency improvements were observed by birth year and grade overall and for all subgroups. However, gains in reading proficiency were substantially less for children eligible for free and reduced lunch and those with moderate-severe to profound hearing loss. With each succeeding birth cohort and grade, increased numbers of children participated in testing because of improved language skills, with higher proportions identified as proficient or advanced readers.
CONCLUSIONS: Notable improvements in reading proficiency after Early Hearing Detection and Intervention implementation were demonstrated, as all groups of children with hearing loss became more likely to achieve proficient and advanced reading levels. On the other hand, some disparities increased, with greater improvements in reading proficiency for children in economically advantaged families.
Copyright © 2021 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34552002      PMCID: PMC9109733          DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-048702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   9.703


  13 in total

1.  The Stanford Achievement Test, 9th Edition: National Norming and Performance Standards for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students.

Authors:  C B Traxler
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2000

2.  Reading and communication skills after universal newborn screening for permanent childhood hearing impairment.

Authors:  D C McCann; S Worsfold; C M Law; M Mullee; S Petrou; J Stevenson; H M Yuen; C R Kennedy
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Large-scale academic achievement testing of deaf and hard-of-hearing students: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Sen Qi; Ross E Mitchell
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2011-06-28

4.  The Colorado Newborn Hearing Screening Project: effects on speech and language development for children with hearing loss.

Authors:  C Yoshinaga-Itano; D Coulter; V Thomson
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Developmental outcomes of children with hearing loss born in Colorado hospitals with and without universal newborn hearing screening programs.

Authors:  C Yoshinaga-Itano; D Coulter; V Thomson
Journal:  Semin Neonatol       Date:  2001-12

6.  Age at Intervention for Permanent Hearing Loss and 5-Year Language Outcomes.

Authors:  Teresa Y C Ching; Harvey Dillon; Laura Button; Mark Seeto; Patricia Van Buynder; Vivienne Marnane; Linda Cupples; Greg Leigh
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss.

Authors:  C Yoshinaga-Itano; A L Sedey; D K Coulter; A L Mehl
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Language Outcomes in Young Children with Mild to Severe Hearing Loss.

Authors:  J Bruce Tomblin; Melody Harrison; Sophie E Ambrose; Elizabeth A Walker; Jacob J Oleson; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Population Outcomes of Three Approaches to Detection of Congenital Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Melissa Wake; Teresa Y C Ching; Karen Wirth; Zeffie Poulakis; Fiona K Mensah; Lisa Gold; Alison King; Hannah E Bryson; Sheena Reilly; Field Rickards
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  What Contribution Did Economic Evidence Make to the Adoption of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Policies in the United States?

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Craig A Mason; Marcus Gaffney; Vickie Thomson; Karl R White
Journal:  Int J Neonatal Screen       Date:  2018-07-20
View more
  1 in total

1.  Association Between Expanded Genomic Sequencing Combined With Hearing Screening and Detection of Hearing Loss Among Newborns in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Yunqian Zhu; Liyuan Hu; Lin Yang; Laishuan Wang; Yulan Lu; Xinran Dong; Tiantian Xiao; Zhengmin Xu; Bingbing Wu; Wenhao Zhou
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-07-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.