Literature DB >> 34551967

Effective Treatment of Established Bone Metastases Can Be Achieved by Combinatorial Osteoclast Blockade and Depletion of Granulocytic Subsets.

Aude-Hélène Capietto1,2, Seunghyun Lee1, David Clever1, Emily Eul1, Haley Ellis3, Cynthia X Ma3, Roberta Faccio4,3.   

Abstract

Osteoclast (OC) blockade has been successful in reducing tumor growth in bone in preclinical settings, but antiresorptive drugs, such as zoledronic acid (ZA), fail to improve the overall survival rate of patients with bone metastasis despite ameliorating skeletal complications. To address this unmet clinical need, we interrogated what other cells modulated tumor growth in bone in addition to OCs. Because myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC)-heterogeneous populations expressing CD11b, Ly6C, and Ly6G markers-originate in the bone marrow and promote tumor progression, we hypothesized that their accumulation hinders ZA antitumor effects. By using a murine model of bone metastasis insensitive to OC blockade, we assessed the antitumor effect of MDSC depletion using anti-Gr1 in mice bearing skeletal lung [Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC)], melanoma (B16-F10), and mammary (4T1) tumors. Differently from soft tissue tumors, anti-Gr1 did not reduce bone metastases and led to the paradoxical accumulation of bone marrow-resident CD11b+Ly6CintLy6Gint cells that differentiated into OCs when cultured in vitro Anti-Gr1-mediated depletion of Ly6G+ granulocytic MDSCs combined with ZA-induced OC blockade reduced growth of established skeletal metastases compared with each agent alone. CD15+ granulocytic populations were increased in patients with breast cancer with progressive bone disease after antiresorptive treatment compared with those with stable bone disease. We provide evidence that antiresorptive therapies fail to reduce bone metastases in the presence of elevated granulocytic populations and that effective treatment of established skeletal metastases requires combinatorial depletion of granulocytes and OC blockade. ©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34551967      PMCID: PMC8642282          DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-21-0232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res        ISSN: 2326-6066            Impact factor:   12.020


  48 in total

1.  Macrophages as potential targets for zoledronic acid outside the skeleton-evidence from in vitro and in vivo models.

Authors:  T L Rogers; N Wind; R Hughes; F Nutter; H K Brown; I Vasiliadou; P D Ottewell; I Holen
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 6.730

Review 2.  Cancer immunoediting: from immunosurveillance to tumor escape.

Authors:  Gavin P Dunn; Allen T Bruce; Hiroaki Ikeda; Lloyd J Old; Robert D Schreiber
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 25.606

3.  Triple-negative breast cancer: immune modulation as the new treatment paradigm.

Authors:  Mary L Disis; Sasha E Stanton
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2015

Review 4.  Understanding the Bone in Cancer Metastasis.

Authors:  Jaime Fornetti; Alana L Welm; Sheila A Stewart
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Adjuvant denosumab in early breast cancer (D-CARE): an international, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Robert Coleman; Dianne M Finkelstein; Carlos Barrios; Miguel Martin; Hiroji Iwata; Roberto Hegg; John Glaspy; Alvaro Montaño Periañez; Katia Tonkin; Ines Deleu; Joohyuk Sohn; John Crown; Suzette Delaloge; Tian Dai; Ying Zhou; Danielle Jandial; Arlene Chan
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Differences in Tumor Microenvironment Dictate T Helper Lineage Polarization and Response to Immune Checkpoint Therapy.

Authors:  Shiping Jiao; Sumit K Subudhi; Ana Aparicio; Zhongqi Ge; Baoxiang Guan; Yuji Miura; Padmanee Sharma
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  The bisphosphonate zoledronic acid decreases tumor growth in bone in mice with defective osteoclasts.

Authors:  Angela C Hirbe; Anke J Roelofs; Desiree H Floyd; Hongju Deng; Stephanie N Becker; Lisa G Lanigan; Anthony J Apicelli; Zhiqiang Xu; Julie L Prior; Mark C Eagleton; David Piwnica-Worms; Michael J Rogers; Katherine Weilbaecher
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 8.  The new bisphosphonate, Zometa (zoledronic acid), decreases skeletal complications in both osteolytic and osteoblastic lesions: a comparison to pamidronate.

Authors:  Allan Lipton; E Small; Fred Saad; D Gleason; David Gordon; M Smith; Lee Rosen; M Ortu Kowalski; Dirk Reitsma; John Seaman
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.176

9.  Silencing of Irf7 pathways in breast cancer cells promotes bone metastasis through immune escape.

Authors:  Bradley N Bidwell; Clare Y Slaney; Nimali P Withana; Sam Forster; Yuan Cao; Sherene Loi; Daniel Andrews; Thomas Mikeska; Niamh E Mangan; Shamith A Samarajiwa; Nicole A de Weerd; Jodee Gould; Pedram Argani; Andreas Möller; Mark J Smyth; Robin L Anderson; Paul J Hertzog; Belinda S Parker
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Effective combinatorial immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Xin Lu; James W Horner; Erin Paul; Xiaoying Shang; Patricia Troncoso; Pingna Deng; Shan Jiang; Qing Chang; Denise J Spring; Padmanee Sharma; John A Zebala; Dean Y Maeda; Y Alan Wang; Ronald A DePinho
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  1 in total

1.  Bone Microenvironment-Suppressed T Cells Increase Osteoclast Formation and Osteolytic Bone Metastases in Mice.

Authors:  Danna L Arellano; Patricia Juárez; Andrea Verdugo-Meza; Paloma S Almeida-Luna; Juan A Corral-Avila; Florian Drescher; Felipe Olvera; Samanta Jiménez; Bennett D Elzey; Theresa A Guise; Pierrick G J Fournier
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 6.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.