Literature DB >> 12442349

The new bisphosphonate, Zometa (zoledronic acid), decreases skeletal complications in both osteolytic and osteoblastic lesions: a comparison to pamidronate.

Allan Lipton1, E Small, Fred Saad, D Gleason, David Gordon, M Smith, Lee Rosen, M Ortu Kowalski, Dirk Reitsma, John Seaman.   

Abstract

Bisphosphonates are the treatment of choice for lytic bone lesions associated with breast cancer. In contrast, bone lesions associated with prostate cancer are predominately osteoblastic. Zoledonic acid (Zol) is a new-generation bisphosphonate that is approximately 2-3 orders of magnitude more potent than pamidronate (Pam) in preclinical models and has demonstrated clinical efficacy in patients with both lytic and blastic lesions. Zoledonic acid (4 mg via 15 min infusion) every 3-4 weeks was directly compared to Pam (90 mg via 2 hr infusion) in 767 patients with breast cancer and bone metastases. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients experiencing a skeletal-related event (SRE) over 13 months. Zoledonic acid was as effective as Pam, and the proportion of Zol-treated patients with an SRE (42% in the hormonal therapy strata and 44% in the chemotherapy strata) was comparable to the original studies comparing Pam to placebo. Among 371 breast cancer patients receiving hormonal therapy, the proportion of patients with an SRE was 47% for Pam vs. 57% for placebo (P = 0.057), and among 380 patients treated with chemotherapy, the proportions with an SRE were 43% for Pam vs. 56% for placebo (P = 0.008) at 12 months. Zoledronic acid (4 mg) has been compared to placebo in a randomized Phase III trial involving 422 men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer metastatic to bone. Zoledonic acid demonstrated a significant advantage over placebo for median time to first SRE (median not reached for Zol vs. 321 days for placebo; P = 0.011), the proportion of patients with an SRE over 15 months (33 vs. 44% for placebo; P = 0.021), and mean skeletal morbidity rate (number of SREs/time, 0.08 vs. 1.49 for placebo; P = 0.006). In addition, the effects of Zol were apparent early. At 3 months, only 12% of Zol-treated patients had an SRE vs. 23% for placebo (P = 0.003), and at 6 months, the proportions were 21 vs. 31% for placebo (P = 0.025). In contrast, a previous study of Pam in 236 prostate cancer patients found that Pam was no more effective than placebo in reducing bone pain or SREs over 6 months. In these studies, Zol was well tolerated with a safety profile similar to other IV bisphosphonates. In conclusion, Zol is the first bisphosphonate to demonstrate efficacy in both lytic and blastic disease. The unique properties of this novel agent should be further explored in future clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12442349     DOI: 10.1081/cnv-120014886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Invest        ISSN: 0735-7907            Impact factor:   2.176


  32 in total

1.  Adverse events associated with hormonal therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ravi J Kumar; Al Barqawi; E David Crawford
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

Review 2.  Management of bone metastases in breast cancer.

Authors:  Allan Lipton
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2005-03

3.  MAPK11 in breast cancer cells enhances osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption.

Authors:  Zhimin He; Jin He; Zhiqiang Liu; Jingda Xu; Sofia F Yi; Huan Liu; Jing Yang
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 4.079

4.  Bone-targeted agents and skeletal-related events in breast cancer patients with bone metastases: the state of the art.

Authors:  M Clemons; K A Gelmon; K I Pritchard; A H G Paterson
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 5.  The role of bisphosphonates in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Authors:  Fred Saad; Pierre Karakiewicz; Paul Perrotte
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2005-01-22       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Patients with bone metastases from solid tumors initiating treatment with a bone-targeted agent in 2011: a descriptive analysis using oncology clinic data in the US.

Authors:  Rohini K Hernandez; Jane Quigley; Melissa Pirolli; David Quach; Kristina S Chen; Jorge Arellano; Alexander Liede
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Emerging Therapeutic for the Treatment of Skeletal-related Events Associated With Metastatic Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Paul R Sieber
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2014

8.  Maspin expression inhibits osteolysis, tumor growth, and angiogenesis in a model of prostate cancer bone metastasis.

Authors:  Michael L Cher; Hector R Biliran; Sunita Bhagat; Yonghong Meng; Mingxin Che; Jaron Lockett; Judith Abrams; Rafael Fridman; Michael Zachareas; Shijie Sheng
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-06-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Loss of osteoprotegerin expression in the inner ear causes degeneration of the cochlear nerve and sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Shyan-Yuan Kao; Judith S Kempfle; Jane B Jensen; Deborah Perez-Fernandez; Andrew C Lysaght; Albert S Edge; Konstantina M Stankovic
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 5.996

10.  Breaking down bone: new insight into site-specific mechanisms of breast cancer osteolysis mediated by metalloproteinases.

Authors:  Theresa A Guise
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.