Literature DB >> 3454919

Contrast sensitivity decline with ageing: a neural or optical phenomenon?

D B Elliott1.   

Abstract

Previous studies of contrast sensitivity changes with age have produced conflicting results. Most recent reports indicate that, with increasing age, contrast sensitivity at medium and high spatial frequencies decreases. Whether this is caused by reduced retinal illumination due to senile pupillary miosis and increased lens absorption, by the greater light scatter of the aged eye or by retinal and neural cell loss and degeneration is also in doubt. We measured the contrast sensitivity functions of 16 young (mean age 21.5 +/- 2.7 years) and 16 older (mean age 72 +/- 4.3 years) subjects with normal healthy eyes, using a modified Rodenstock retinometer and a monitor-based computer system. The former method bypasses the effects of the optical media to measure the contrast sensitivity function of the retinal and neural system alone, while the latter measures the contrast sensitivity function of the whole visual system, including media. The results show the older group to have significantly lower contrast sensitivity at medium (4 c deg-1, p less than 0.1) and high (10.6 c deg-1, p less than 0.001; 16.5 c deg-1, p less than 0.001) spatial frequencies. They also suggest that this is due primarily to retinal and neural changes with age, with optical factors having a slight effect at the highest spatial frequency only.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3454919

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  27 in total

Review 1.  Aging and vision.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  [Frankfurt-Freiburg Contrast and Acuity Test System (FF-CATS). A new test to determine contrast sensitivity under variable ambient and glare luminance levels].

Authors:  E Terzi; J Bühren; W Wesemann; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Simulating age-related optical changes in the human eye.

Authors:  D Whitaker; D B Elliott
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Micro and regular saccades across the lifespan during a visual search of "Where's Waldo" puzzles.

Authors:  Nicholas L Port; Jane Trimberger; Steve Hitzeman; Bryan Redick; Stephen Beckerman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Invariance of the pattern electroretinogram evoked by psychophysically equivalent stimuli in human ageing.

Authors:  J A Muir; H L Barlow; J D Morrison
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Age-related changes in contrast gain related to the M and P pathways.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Normative best-corrected values of the visual image quality metric VSX as a function of age and pupil size.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Jason D Marsack; Larry N Thibos; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Aging and detection of collision events on curved trajectories.

Authors:  Zheng Bian; Amy H Guindon; George J Andersen
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2012-08-14

9.  Role of high-order aberrations in senescent changes in spatial vision.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; Stacey S Choi; Nathan Doble; Joseph L Hardy; Julia W Evans; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Contour enhancement benefits older adults with simulated central field loss.

Authors:  Miyoung Kwon; Chaithanya Ramachandra; Premnandhini Satgunam; Bartlett W Mel; Eli Peli; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.