BACKGROUND: Public health experts recommend school-based policies as a population based approach to increase youth physical activity. The purpose of this case study is to describe one, largely rural, state's efforts to translate this recommendation into practice. Details about the genesis, implementation and evolution of two state level policies (physical education and physical activity), as well as in-house efforts of a State Department of Education to monitor policy compliance and challenges encountered are described. Two specific years are highlighted, due to policy and monitoring enhancements made during those particular time periods. METHODS: Data for this paper come from the West Virginia Department of Education for two time periods: 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 (n=369 elementary schools). Descriptive statistics for quantitative data and content analysis for qualitative data were used to document school level compliance and provide context for implementation challenges. RESULTS: Greater than 70% of school principals reported achievement of physical education and physical activity policy expectations for each year. Limited staff was the predominant explanation for nonfulfillment of physical education expectations, followed by lack of time and facilities. Recess and classroom-based physical activity were the primary strategies used to comply with the physical activity expectations. PE and PA policy compliance varied significantly by certain school characteristics in each school year studied. CONCLUSIONS: Further investigation is warranted on how states translate public health policy recommendations into practice, including how physical education and physical activity policies are developed and monitored at the state level and how to support states and schools with monitoring and implementation challenges.
BACKGROUND: Public health experts recommend school-based policies as a population based approach to increase youth physical activity. The purpose of this case study is to describe one, largely rural, state's efforts to translate this recommendation into practice. Details about the genesis, implementation and evolution of two state level policies (physical education and physical activity), as well as in-house efforts of a State Department of Education to monitor policy compliance and challenges encountered are described. Two specific years are highlighted, due to policy and monitoring enhancements made during those particular time periods. METHODS: Data for this paper come from the West Virginia Department of Education for two time periods: 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 (n=369 elementary schools). Descriptive statistics for quantitative data and content analysis for qualitative data were used to document school level compliance and provide context for implementation challenges. RESULTS: Greater than 70% of school principals reported achievement of physical education and physical activity policy expectations for each year. Limited staff was the predominant explanation for nonfulfillment of physical education expectations, followed by lack of time and facilities. Recess and classroom-based physical activity were the primary strategies used to comply with the physical activity expectations. PE and PA policy compliance varied significantly by certain school characteristics in each school year studied. CONCLUSIONS: Further investigation is warranted on how states translate public health policy recommendations into practice, including how physical education and physical activity policies are developed and monitored at the state level and how to support states and schools with monitoring and implementation challenges.
Entities:
Keywords:
compliance monitoring; physical activity; physical education; public health recommendations; school policy
Authors: William B Strong; Robert M Malina; Cameron J R Blimkie; Stephen R Daniels; Rodney K Dishman; Bernard Gutin; Albert C Hergenroeder; Aviva Must; Patricia A Nixon; James M Pivarnik; Thomas Rowland; Stewart Trost; François Trudeau Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Russell R Pate; Michael G Davis; Thomas N Robinson; Elaine J Stone; Thomas L McKenzie; Judith C Young Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-08-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Matthew T Mahar; Sheila K Murphy; David A Rowe; Jeannie Golden; A Tamlyn Shields; Thomas D Raedeke Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Ross C Brownson; Cheryl M Kelly; Amy A Eyler; Cheryl Carnoske; Lisa Grost; Susan L Handy; Jay E Maddock; Delores Pluto; Brian A Ritacco; James F Sallis; Thomas L Schmid Journal: J Phys Act Health Date: 2008-07
Authors: Alicia M Manteiga; Amy A Eyler; Cheryl Valko; Ross C Brownson; Kelly R Evenson; Thomas Schmid Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Jordan A Carlson; James F Sallis; Jamie F Chriqui; Linda Schneider; Lindsey C McDermid; Peggy Agron Journal: J Sch Health Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 2.118
Authors: Angie L Cradock; Jessica L Barrett; Cheryl Carnoske; Jamie F Chriqui; Kelly R Evenson; Jeanette Gustat; Isobel B Healy; Katie M Heinrich; Stephenie C Lemon; Nancy Oʼhara Tompkins; Hannah L Reed; Susan G Zieff Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2013 May-Jun
Authors: Kenneth H Cooper; Jayne D Greenberg; Darla M Castelli; Mitch Barton; Scott B Martin; James R Morrow Journal: Res Q Exerc Sport Date: 2016-04-21 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Jordan A Carlson; Alexandra M Mignano; Gregory J Norman; Thomas L McKenzie; Jacqueline Kerr; Elva M Arredondo; Hala Madanat; Kelli L Cain; John P Elder; Brian E Saelens; James F Sallis Journal: Am J Health Promot Date: 2014 Jan-Feb
Authors: Kenneth R Allison; Karen Vu-Nguyen; Bessie Ng; Nour Schoueri-Mychasiw; John J M Dwyer; Heather Manson; Erin Hobin; Steve Manske; Jennifer Robertson Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-08-08 Impact factor: 3.295