| Literature DB >> 34548892 |
Martin Lubega1, Charles Peter Osingada1, Phillip Kasirye2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) is the leading genetic disease in sub-Saharan Africa and therefore remains a global public health threat. Use of complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) most especially herbal medicine (HM) in chronic diseases such as sickle cell disease has widely been reported in Africa where advanced technologies are greatly lacking. Despite a large presence of the sickle cell disease in Uganda, the extent to which herbal medicines are used in management of children with sickle cell disease has not been documented. This study purposed to determine the prevalence of herbal medicine (HM) use and associated factors among caregivers of children with SCD at Mulago National Referral Hospital.Entities:
Keywords: Herbal medicine; caregivers; use
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34548892 PMCID: PMC8435373 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2021.39.163.20740
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pan Afr Med J
socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents
| Characteristic | Frequency (N = 384) | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| 18 - 32 | 194 | 50.5 |
| 33 - 75 | 190 | 49.5 |
|
| ||
| Male | 89 | 23.2 |
| Female | 292 | 76.8 |
|
| ||
| Single | 63 | 16.4 |
| Married/cohabiting | 272 | 70.8 |
| Separated | 32 | 8.4 |
| Widowed | 17 | 4.4 |
|
| ||
| *Baganda | 231 | 60.2 |
| Basoga | 33 | 8.6 |
| Banyankole | 21 | 5.5 |
| Batooro | 13 | 3.4 |
| Iteso | 10 | 2.6 |
| Others | 76 | 19.7 |
|
| ||
| Christians | 296 | 77.1 |
| Muslims | 88 | 22.9 |
|
| ||
| Primary and below | 110 | 28.6 |
| Secondary and beyond | 274 | 71.4 |
|
| ||
| Rural | 101 | 26.3 |
| Urban | 283 | 73.7 |
|
| ||
| Housewife | 70 | 18.2 |
| Farmers | 34 | 8.9 |
| Businessman/woman | 134 | 33.3 |
| Professional job | 50 | 13.0 |
| Vocational job | 73 | 19.0 |
| No job | 29 | 7.6 |
|
| ||
| ≤ 200,000 | 206 | 53.6 |
| >200,000 | 178 | 46.4 |
Baganda are the commonest ethnic tribe in the central region of Uganda where Mulago Hospital is also located
bivariate analysis of socio-demographic factors associated with herbal medicine use among caretakers of children with sickle cell disease attending Mulago sickle cell clinic
| Variable | Ever used HM N (%), (N = 298) | Never used HM, N (%), N = 86 | P-value | Cured Odds Ratio (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Male | 67 (75.3) | 22 (24.7) | 0.549 | 0.844 (0.484 – 1.471) |
| Female | 231 (78.3) | 64 (21.7) | ||
|
| ||||
| 18 – 32 | 150 (77.3) | 44 (22.7) | 0.892 | 0.967 (0.599 – 1.563) |
| 33 - 75 | 148 (77.9) | 42 (22.1) | ||
|
| ||||
| Christians | 225 (76.0) | 71 (24.0) | 0.170 | 0.651 (0.352 – 1.206) |
| Muslims | 73 (83.0) | 15 (17.0) | ||
|
| ||||
| Un married | 86 (76.8) | 26 (23.2) | 0.805 | 0.936 (0.554 – 1.581) |
| Married | 212 (77.9) | 60 (22.1) | ||
|
| ||||
| Primary and below | 85 (77.3) | 25 (22.7) | 0.921 | 0.974 (0.574 – 1.653) |
| Secondary and above | 213 (77.7) | 61 (22.3) | ||
|
| ||||
| Employed | 75 (75.8) | 24 (24.2) | 0.609 | 0.869 (0.507 – 1.489) |
| unemployed | 223 (78.2) | 62 (21.8) | ||
|
| ||||
| ≤ 200,000 | 163 (79.1) | 43 (20.9) | 0.442 | 1.207 (0.747 – 1.952) |
| ≥ 200,001 | 135 (75.8) | 43 (24.2) | ||
|
| ||||
| Rural | 81 (80.2) | 20 (19.8) | 0.466 | 1.232 (0.702 – 2.160) |
| Urban | 217 (76.7) | 66 (23.3) |
Female caretakers/ attendants more commonly bring the sick children to hospitals in our setting.
bivariate analysis of individual, community, and health service related factors associated with herbal medicine use among caretakers of children with sickle cell disease
| Variable | Ever used HM, N (%) N = 298 | Never used HM, N (%) N = 86 | P-value | Cured Odds Ratio (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HM cures symptoms faster than CM | Agree | 109 (90.8) | 11 (9.2) | 0.000* | 3.932 (2.002 – 7.725) |
| Disagree | 189 (71.6) | 75 (28.4) | |||
| HM has fewer side effects | Agree | 203 (88.6) | 26 (11.4) | 0.000* | 4.931(2.930-8.300) |
| Disagree | 95 (61.3) | 60 (38.7) | |||
| HM is more effective in treating SCD | Agree | 89 (83.2) | 18 (16.8) | 0.103 | 1.609 (0.905 – 2.861) |
| Disagree | 209 (75.5) | 68 (24.5) | |||
| HM improves lives of SCD children | Agree | 112 (88.2) | 15 (11.8) | 0.000* | 2.850 (1.558 – 5.216) |
| Disagree | 186 (72.4) | 71 (27.6) | |||
| HM is manages pain more effectively | Agree | 70 (90.9) | 7 (9.1) | 0.002* | 3.465 (1.529 – 7.851) |
| Disagree | 228 (74.3) | 79 (25.7) | |||
| CM works better when use together with HM | Agree | 206 (82.1) | 45 (17.9) | 0.004* | 2.040 (1.251 – 3.328) |
| Disagree | 92 (69.2) | 41 (30.8) | |||
| HM is cheaper | Agree | 184 (79.0) | 49 (21.0) | 0.425 | 1.219 (0.749 – 1.983) |
| Disagree | 114 (75.5) | 37 (24.5) | |||
| HM is easier to access information on use | Agree | 223 (80.5) | 54 (19.5) | 0.028* | 1.762 (1.059 – 2.933) |
| Disagree | 75 (70.1) | 32 (29.9) | |||
| Costs of CM make people to use HM | Agree | 220 (79.7) | 56 (20.3) | 0.114 | 1.511(0.904 – 2.524) |
| Disagree | 78 (72.2) | 30 (27.8) | |||
| Television adverts encourage HM | Agree | 242 (83.7) | 47 (16.3) | 0.000* | 3.586 (2.144 – 5.998) |
| Disagree | 56 (58.9) | 39 (41.1) | |||
| Cultures influence HM | Agree | 205 (80.1) | 51 (19.9) | 0.100 | 1.513(0.922 – 2.482) |
| Disagree | 93 (72.7) | 35 (27.3) | |||
| HM is readily available | Agree | 242 (80.9) | 57 (19.1) | 0.003* | 2.199 (1.290 – 3.747) |
| Disagree | 56 (65.9) | 29 (34.1) | |||
| Radio adverts encourage HM use | Agree | 225 (79.2) | 59 (20.8) | 0.199 | 1.410 (0.833 – 2.388) |
| Disagree | 73 (73.0) | 27 (27.0) | |||
| Drug shortages at the clinic encourage HM use | Agree | 210 (78.7) | 57 (21.3) | 0.457 | 1.214 (0.728 – 2.025) |
| Disagree | 88 (75.2) | 29 (24.8) | |||
| Health workers’ poor communication encourages HM use | Agree | 104 (80.0) | 26 (20.0) | 0.420 | 1.237 (0.737 – 2.077) |
| Disagree | 194 (76.4) | 60 (23.6) | |||
| Long waiting times at clinic encourages HM use | Agree | 147 (81.2) | 34 (18.8) | 0.109 | 1.489 (0.914 – 2.426) |
| Disagree | 151 (74.4) | 52 (25.6) | |||
| Vendors’ good communication encourages HM use | Agree | 244 (80.3) | 60 (19.7) | 0.015* | 1.958 (1.134 – 3.382) |
| Disagree | 54 (67.5) | 26 (32.5) |
HM = Herbal Medicine, CM = Conventional medicine, * results are statistically significant at p-value of < 0.05
multivariate analysis of factors associated with herbal medicine use among caretakers of children with sickle cell disease attending Mulago sickle cell clinic
| Variable | Adjusted Odds Ratio | 95% C.I. | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.906 | (0.494 - 1.662) | 0.750 |
| Gender | 0.753 | (0.366 -1.549) | 0.440 |
| Religion | 0.904 | (0.442 -1.849) | 0.782 |
| Marital | 1.176 | (0.608 - 2.277) | 0.630 |
| Highest Education level | 0.681 | (0.341 -1.358) | 0.275 |
| Job | 0.839 | (0.368 -1.914) | 0.677 |
| Earning | 1.277 | (0.596 -2.737) | 0.530 |
| Residence | 1.109 | (0.555 -2.217) | 0.769 |
| HM cures symptoms faster than CM | 3.439 | (1.447 - 8.176) | 0.005* |
| HM has fewer side effects | 3.528 | (1.917 -6.494) | 0.000* |
| HM is more effective in treating SCD | 0.628 | (0.268 -1.470) | 0.283 |
| HM makes life of children better | 1.824 | (0.816 -4.077) | 0.143 |
| HM is more effective in managing pain | 1.984 | (0.757 - 5.202) | 0.163 |
| CM works better when used with HM | 1.668 | (0.928 - 2.998) | 0.087 |
| HM is cheaper than CM | 0.810 | (0.420 -1.561) | 0.529 |
| It is easy to access information on HM use | 0.999 | (0.494 -2.019) | 0.998 |
| CM is costly so people resort to HM | 1.235 | (0.651 - 2.343) | 0.519 |
| TV adverts on HM use encourage HN use | 4.185 | (2.036 -8.603) | 0.000* |
| Cultures influence HM use | 1.491 | (0.806 -2.758) | 0.203 |
| HM is readily available in communities | 2.037 | (1.016 -4.084) | 0.045 |
| Radio adverts encourage in HM use | 0.613 | (0.293 -1.283) | 0.194 |
| Lack of medicines at the clinic encourages HM use | 0.719 | (0.369 -1.402) | 0.333 |
| Poor communication by H/W encourage HM | 0.804 | (0.415 - 1.555) | 0.516 |
| Long waiting time at the clinic encourages HM use | 1.443 | (0.775 -2.687) | 0.248 |
| Good communication of HM vendors encourages use | 1.270 | (0.644 -2.508) | 0.490 |
Results are statistically significant at p-value of < 0.05