Literature DB >> 34548714

High-Dimensional Precision Medicine From Patient-Derived Xenografts.

Naim U Rashid1,2, Daniel J Luckett1, Jingxiang Chen1, Michael T Lawson1, Longshaokan Wang3, Yunshu Zhang3, Eric B Laber3, Yufeng Liu1,4,5, Jen Jen Yeh2,6,7, Donglin Zeng1, Michael R Kosorok1,4.   

Abstract

The complexity of human cancer often results in significant heterogeneity in response to treatment. Precision medicine offers the potential to improve patient outcomes by leveraging this heterogeneity. Individualized treatment rules (ITRs) formalize precision medicine as maps from the patient covariate space into the space of allowable treatments. The optimal ITR is that which maximizes the mean of a clinical outcome in a population of interest. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) studies permit the evaluation of multiple treatments within a single tumor, and thus are ideally suited for estimating optimal ITRs. PDX data are characterized by correlated outcomes, a high-dimensional feature space, and a large number of treatments. Here we explore machine learning methods for estimating optimal ITRs from PDX data. We analyze data from a large PDX study to identify biomarkers that are informative for developing personalized treatment recommendations in multiple cancers. We estimate optimal ITRs using regression-based (Q-learning) and direct-search methods (outcome weighted learning). Finally, we implement a superlearner approach to combine multiple estimated ITRs and show that the resulting ITR performs better than any of the input ITRs, mitigating uncertainty regarding user choice. Our results indicate that PDX data are a valuable resource for developing individualized treatment strategies in oncology. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers; Deep learning autoencoders; Machine learning; Outcome weighted learning; Precision medicine; Q-learning

Year:  2020        PMID: 34548714      PMCID: PMC8451968          DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1828091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  39 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Independent filtering increases detection power for high-throughput experiments.

Authors:  Richard Bourgon; Robert Gentleman; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A Generalization Error for Q-Learning.

Authors:  Susan A Murphy
Journal:  J Mach Learn Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.654

4.  Estimation and extrapolation of optimal treatment and testing strategies.

Authors:  James Robins; Liliana Orellana; Andrea Rotnitzky
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Marginal Mean Models for Dynamic Regimes.

Authors:  S A Murphy; M J van der Laan; J M Robins
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 6.  Clinical trial designs for predictive marker validation in cancer treatment trials.

Authors:  Daniel J Sargent; Barbara A Conley; Carmen Allegra; Laurence Collette
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Heterogeneity in breast cancer.

Authors:  Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Reinforcement learning strategies for clinical trials in nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Yufan Zhao; Donglin Zeng; Mark A Socinski; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Super-Learning of an Optimal Dynamic Treatment Rule.

Authors:  Alexander R Luedtke; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 0.968

10.  Estimating Optimal Treatment Regimes from a Classification Perspective.

Authors:  Baqun Zhang; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian; Min Zhang; Eric Laber
Journal:  Stat       Date:  2012-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.