Literature DB >> 34547543

State-level structural sexism and cesarean sections in the United States.

Amanda Nagle1, Goleen Samari2.   

Abstract

The United States (U.S.) has one of the highest cesarean rates in the world yet little research considers structural factors, like racism and sexism, associated with the higher than recommended cesarean rate. New research operationalizes and quantifies structural sexism across U.S. states, which allows for consideration of how social norms and values around women and their bodies relate to the overmedicalization of birth through cesarean sections. We obtained restricted natality data for 2018 from the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics. In 2018, among people 15-49 years, 987,187 births fit the criteria for low-risk of cesarean section. Structural sexism scores were derived from 6 elements covering economic, political, cultural, and physical arenas that were totaled and standardized to create an aggregate index for each state and DC (scores range from -1.06 to 1.4). Using multivariable logistic and multilevel mixed effects logistic regression models, we examined the associations between structural sexism and low-risk cesarean section for all fifty states and the District of Columbia, controlling for relevant confounders. We found that structural sexism in 2018 was highest in historically religious mountain states and the South. Nationally, the low-risk cesarean rate was 25.1%. Multilevel models show that people living in states with higher structural sexism scores were more likely to have a cesarean section (OR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.07-1.39). Structural sexism is related to low-risk cesarean rates in U.S., providing evidence that social ideas and norms about women and their bodies are related to overmedicalization of birth. Health policymakers, providers and scholars should pay attention to structural drivers, including structural sexism, as a factor that affects overmedicalization of birth and subsequent health outcomes for pregnant people and their infants.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean section; Obstetric violence; Overmedicalization; Sexism; Structural sexism

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34547543      PMCID: PMC9305667          DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   5.379


  20 in total

Review 1.  Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits?

Authors:  Kimberly D Gregory; Sherri Jackson; Lisa Korst; Moshe Fridman
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Disciplinary discourses: rates of cesarean section explained by medicine, midwifery, and feminism.

Authors:  Amy Su May Lee; Maggie Kirkman
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2008-05

3.  Trends in low-risk cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990-2013.

Authors:  Michelle J K Osterman; Joyce A Martin
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2014-11-05

4.  The evolution of birth medicalisation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Christophe Clesse; Joëlle Lighezzolo-Alnot; Sylvie de Lavergne; Sandrine Hamlin; Michèle Scheffler
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 2.372

5.  Moving beyond disrespect and abuse: addressing the structural dimensions of obstetric violence.

Authors:  Michelle Sadler; Mário Jds Santos; Dolores Ruiz-Berdún; Gonzalo Leiva Rojas; Elena Skoko; Patricia Gillen; Jette A Clausen
Journal:  Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2016-06-04

Review 6.  Elective cesarean section and decision making: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Chris McCourt; Jane Weaver; Helen Statham; Sarah Beake; Jenny Gamble; Debra K Creedy
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.689

Review 7.  Psychosocial sequelae of cesarean delivery: review and analysis of their causes and implications.

Authors:  Marci Lobel; Robyn Stein DeLuca
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Elective Deliveries and Neonatal Outcomes in Full-Term Pregnancies.

Authors:  Julien O Teitler; Rayven Plaza; Thomas Hegyi; Lakota Kruse; Nancy E Reichman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 5.363

9.  Mistreatment of Women in Childbirth: Time for Action on This Important Dimension of Violence against Women.

Authors:  Rachel Jewkes; Loveday Penn-Kekana
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop.

Authors:  Catherine Y Spong; Vincenzo Berghella; Katharine D Wenstrom; Brian M Mercer; George R Saade
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  1 in total

1.  Childbearing Biographies and Midlife Women's Health.

Authors:  Mieke Beth Thomeer; Rin Reczek; Clifford Ross
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2022-02-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.