| Literature DB >> 34547511 |
Shitiz Sriwastava1, Saurabh Kataria2, Samiksha Srivastava3, Shaghayegh Kazemlou4, Si Gao5, Sijin Wen5, Hamidreza Saber6, Richa Tripathi7, Zubeda Sheikh7, Sarah Peterson8, Ronald Gwinn8, Evanthia Bernitsas9.
Abstract
Background High efficacy disease modifying therapies (DMT) in the management of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) have a favorable effect on relapse rate and disability progression; however, they can expose patients to significant risks, such as progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Objective The study aims to investigate prognostic factors that can determine outcome in MS-related PML patients. Methods We conducted a literature review and meta-analysis of 194 patients from 62 articles in PubMed, SCOPUS and EMBASE. Results Out of 194 patients (66.5% women, 33.5% men), 81% had progression in their EDSS score by at least 1 point from the time of PML diagnosis (EDSS-P group). The remaining patients had either stable or improved EDSS (EDSS-S group). In univariate analysis, older age at the time of PML diagnosis was associated with higher probability of disability accumulation and worsening of EDSS by at least 1 point (mean age = 44.8, p = 0.046). After adjusting for other variables, age at time of PML diagnosis remained a significant predictive variable in the multivariable logistic model (OR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.88-0.99, p = 0.037). Natalizumab is the most commonly associated DMT linked to PML, followed by fingolimod and others including dimethyl fumarate, ocrelizumab, alemtuzumab. Among the different treatments used, no therapeutic agent was found to be superior in improving post-PML EDSS. Conclusions Younger age and lower JCV viral load at the time of PML diagnosis were associated with better outcome in MS-associate PML, while none of the PML therapies was superior over the others or associated with favorable outcome.Entities:
Keywords: Disease modifying therapy; EDSS; Fatality; Fingolimod; Multiple sclerosis; Natalizumab; Ocrelizumab; PML
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34547511 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2021.577721
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuroimmunol ISSN: 0165-5728 Impact factor: 3.478