| Literature DB >> 34545676 |
Jun Zhou1, Yinghao Yin1, Yuan Yang1, Dongyi Peng1, Jingchao Wei1, Guangming Yin1, Yuxin Tang1,2,3.
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the possibility of miR-423-5p modified adipose-derived stem cell (ADSCs) therapy on streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetes mellitus erectile dysfunction (DMED) rats. MiR-423-5p was knocked down in ADSCs. ADSCs, NC-miR-ADSCs and miR-ADSCs were co-cultured with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). Normal and high glucose media were supplemented. The supernatant and HUVECs were collected for assessment of eNOS and VEGFa expression, cell proliferation, and apoptosis. HUVECs co-cultured with ADSCs or miR-ADSCs exhibited higher eNOS and VEGFa protein expression levels compared to DM groups. MiR-ADSCs enhanced HUVEC proliferation compared to the ADSCs and NC-miR-ADSCs. Lower apoptotic rates were observed when HUVECs were co-cultured with miR-ADSCs, compared to ADSCs and NC-miR-ADSCs. Fifteen male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats aged 12 weeks were induced to develop diabetes mellitus by intraperitoneal injection with STZ, and five healthy SD rats were used as normal controls. Eight weeks after developing diabetes, the rats received ADSCs and miR-ADSCs via injection into the corpora cavernosa, whereas normal controls and DM controls were injected with saline. Erectile function and histological assessment of penile tissues were performed 8 weeks after injection. The ICP/MAP indicated that erectile function was impaired in the DM rats compared with the normal group. Injection of ADSCs and miR-ADSCs improved erectile function significantly and was associated with the overexpression of eNOS and VEGFa. MiR-423-5p knockdown in ADSCs ameliorated high glucose-mediated damage to HUVECs and improved erectile function in DM rats by inducing eNOS and VEGFa overexpression, indicating that miR-423-5p may be a potential target in the treatment of DMED.Entities:
Keywords: ADSCs; VEGFa; diabetes mellitus; eNOS; erectile dysfunction; miR-423-5p
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34545676 PMCID: PMC8505849 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.16927
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
FIGURE 1NOS3 and VEGFa are the target genes of miR‐423‐5p. (A) Predicted miR‐423‐5p binding sites of the NOS3 and VEGFa genes are shown in red. (B) Luciferase reporter assay showing post‐transcriptional repression of the NOS3 and VEGFa genes. Cells were cotransfected with miR‐423‐5p mimics and pmirGLO‐NOS3.3UTR or pmirGLO‐VEGFA.3UTR cloned into expression vector downstream of the luciferase gene
FIGURE 2(A) Relative miR‐423‐5p expression after miR‐423‐5p knockdown in ADSCs. Approximately 12 and 24 h after inhibition of miR‐423‐5p, RNA was extracted for qRT‐PCR analysis. miR‐423‐5p expression was downregulated at both 12 and 24 h (p < 0.001). (B) Western blot: eNOS and VEGFA expression after miR‐423‐5p knockdown in ADSCs. (C and D) Relative eNOS and VEGFa expression levels increased with miR‐423‐5p inhibition. p < 0.05 versus normal ADSCs
FIGURE 3Changes in cell function when HUVECs are co‐cultured with ADSCs, NC‐miR‐ADSCs and miR‐ADSCs in normal or high glucose supplemented media. (A) eNOS expression in the culture medium; (B) VEGFa expression in the culture medium; (C) cell proliferation; (D) eNOS and VEGFa protein expression levels; (E) relative eNOS protein expression levels; (F) relative VEGFa protein expression levels; (G) flow cytometry; y axis is propidium Iodide(PI), x is Annexin V. The upper right quadrant represents late apoptotic and necrotic cells, while the lower right quadrant represents early apoptotic cells. *p < 0.01 compared to miR‐ADSCs + HUVEC in normal glucose conditions; # p < 0.05 compared to NC‐miR‐ADSCs + HUVEC in high glucose conditions
FIGURE 4MiR‐ADSCs improve erectile function upon cavernous nerve electrostimulation in diabetic SD rats. (A) Representative tracings of Intracavernosal Pressure (ICP) in cm H2O for normal rats (N), diabetes mellitus rats (DM), ADSC‐injected rats (ADSCs) and miR‐ADSC‐injected rats (miR‐ADSC). (B) Erectile function is presented as the ICP/MAP ratio in each group. *p < 0.05 compared to the DM group; # p < 0.05 compared to the DM group. (C) eNOS and VEGFa protein expression levels; (D) relative eNOS protein expression levels, *p < 0.05 compared to the DM group, # p < 0.05 compared to the ADSC group; (E) relative VEGFa protein expression levels, *p < 0.05 compared to the DM group, # p < 0.05 compared to the ADSC group
FIGURE 5Expression of VEGFa and eNOS in the penile cavernous tissue 12 weeks after ADSCs/miR‐ADSCs implantation. (A) Expression of VEGFa and eNOS assessed by immunofluorescene staining and the mason trichrome staining of the cavernous tissue. (B) Comparison of VEGFa and eNOS expression and the ratio of muscle and collagen in different treatment groups. *p < 0.05 compared to the ADSCs group and miR‐ADSCs group