Literature DB >> 28122386

Endoscopic management of Barrett's esophagus: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement.

Bas Weusten1,2, Raf Bisschops3, Emanuel Coron4, Mário Dinis-Ribeiro5, Jean-Marc Dumonceau6, José-Miguel Esteban7, Cesare Hassan8, Oliver Pech9, Alessandro Repici10, Jacques Bergman2, Massimiliano di Pietro11.   

Abstract

Current practices for the management of Barrett's esophagus (BE) vary across Europe, as several national European guidelines exist. This Position Statement from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) is an attempt to homogenize recommendations and, hence, patient management according to the best scientific evidence and other considerations (e.g. health policy). A Working Group developed consensus statements, using the existing national guidelines as a starting point and considering new evidence in the literature. The Position Statement wishes to contribute to a more cost-effective approach to the care of patients with BE by reducing the number of surveillance endoscopies for patients with a low risk of malignant progression and centralizing care in expert centers for those with high progression rates.Main statements MS1 The diagnosis of BE is made if the distal esophagus is lined with columnar epithelium with a minimum length of 1 cm (tongues or circular) containing specialized intestinal metaplasia at histopathological examination. MS2 The ESGE recommends varying surveillance intervals for different BE lengths. For patients with an irregular Z-line/columnar-lined esophagus of < 1 cm, no routine biopsies or endoscopic surveillance is advised. For BE ≥ 1 cm and < 3 cm, BE surveillance should be repeated every 5 years. For BE ≥ 3 cm and < 10 cm, the interval for endoscopic surveillance should be 3 years. Patients with BE with a maximum extent ≥ 10 cm should be referred to a BE expert center for surveillance endoscopies. Patients with limited life expectancy and advanced age should be discharged from endoscopic surveillance. MS3 The diagnosis of any degree of dysplasia (including "indefinite for dysplasia") in BE requires confirmation by an expert gastrointestinal pathologist. MS4Patients with visible lesions in BE diagnosed as dysplasia or early cancer should be referred to a BE expert center. All visible abnormalities, regardless of the degree of dysplasia, should be removed by means of endoscopic resection techniques in order to obtain optimal histopathological staging MS5 All patients with a BE ≥ 10 cm, a confirmed diagnosis of low grade dysplasia, high grade dysplasia (HGD), or early cancer should be referred to a BE expert center for surveillance and/or treatment. BE expert centers should meet the following criteria: annual case load of ≥10 new patients undergoing endoscopic treatment for HGD or early carcinoma per BE expert endoscopist; endoscopic and histological care provided by endoscopists and pathologists who have followed additional training; at least 30 supervised endoscopic resection and 30 endoscopic ablation procedures to acquire competence in technical skills, management pathways, and complications; multidisciplinary meetings with gastroenterologists, surgeons, oncologists, and pathologists to discuss patients with Barrett's neoplasia; access to experienced esophageal surgery; and all BE patients registered prospectively in a database. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28122386     DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-122140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  97 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic therapy for confirmed low-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Silvia Pecere; Guido Costamagna
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-10-29

2.  The global prevalence of Barrett's esophagus: A systematic review of the published literature.

Authors:  Inês Marques de Sá; Pedro Marcos; Prateek Sharma; Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 3.  Critical appraisal of guidelines for screening and surveillance of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Spyridon Michopoulos
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-07

4.  Safety and Acceptability of Esophageal Cytosponge Cell Collection Device in a Pooled Analysis of Data From Individual Patients.

Authors:  Wladyslaw Januszewicz; Wei Keith Tan; Katie Lehovsky; Irene Debiram-Beecham; Tara Nuckcheddy; Susan Moist; Sudarshan Kadri; Massimiliano di Pietro; Alex Boussioutas; Nicholas J Shaheen; David A Katzka; Evan S Dellon; Rebecca C Fitzgerald
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 5.  Endoscopic Management of Refractory Benign Esophageal Strictures.

Authors:  Alessandro Fugazza; Alessandro Repici
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 6.  Clinical Guidelines Update on the Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Michelle Clermont; Gary W Falk
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Screening and Prevention of Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Oliver Pech
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2019-07-25

8.  Barrets Oesophagus and Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Villy Våge
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Risk of Neoplastic Progression Among Patients with an Irregular Z Line on Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  David Itskoviz; Zohar Levi; Doron Boltin; Alex Vilkin; Yifat Snir; Rachel Gingold-Belfer; Yaron Niv; Iris Dotan; Ram Dickman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 10.  How Should We Report Endoscopic Results in Patient's with Barrett's Esophagus?

Authors:  Venkata Subhash Gorrepati; Prateek Sharma
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.