Literature DB >> 34542610

Gently handling the acutely failing right ventricle … at last!

Roberto Lorusso1,2, Silvia Mariani1,2, Justine M Ravaux1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hybrid approach; Left ventricular assist devices; Percutaneous approach; Right ventricular assist device; Right ventricular failure

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34542610      PMCID: PMC8557793          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivab248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


× No keyword cloud information.
A minimally invasive approach for temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) implantation has been a ‘dream’ for many operators, care-givers and, especially, patients. Indeed, MCS implant has been associated for a long time with invasive approaches, which were required to position the drainage and return cannulas. These approaches often involve invasive surgery to gain accesses to the intrathoracic structures and main vessels, turning MCS implantation into a high-risk procedure. Moreover, such invasive approaches are burdened with further potential complications such as infection of the wound, bleeding from the implantation site, difficult nursing management and significant limitation to patient’s mobility. Patients diagnosed with acute right ventricular failure (aRVF) after a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation often experience the above-mentioned scenario. Indeed, the management of early aRVF after LVAD implantation may require the use of a dedicated temporary right ventricular assist device (RVAD) and, sometimes, even a durable RVAD [1]. Peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has been applied as bridge to recovery for the post-LVAD failing right ventricle (RV). Nevertheless, it is characterized by several drawbacks such as the decrease of LVAD preload due to RV unloading, the increase of LVAD afterload with risk of reduced forward blood flow and protracted aortic valve closure, potentially leading to thrombotic events. Furthermore, a complete RV and pulmonary bypass might lead to a marked reduction of the blood flow through the pulmonary vascular system, which is associated to vascular and lung reperfusion damage once the normal circulation is restored [2]. It goes without saying, therefore, that managing post-LVAD aRVF requires a peculiar decision-making process and the application of alternative and innovative solutions. An increased awareness about post-LVAD aRVF, the appraisal of its actual incidence and a higher attention to a timely diagnosis and management have led to a broader use of dedicated temporary MCS able to support the failing RV through less invasive techniques. The major breakthrough in this setting has certainly been represented by the development of a percutaneous approach to the pulmonary artery (PA) [3]. Indeed, reaching the PA with the percutaneous implantation of a single-lumen (Biomedicus, Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis) or double-lumen (ProtekDuo®, TandemLife) cannula [4], as well as a the availability of a dedicated percutaneous RVAD (Impella RP, Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA), has introduced new concepts and options in the management of aRVF [5, 6]. The paper by Natanov et al. [7] illustrates a limited, yet significant single-center experience with a percutaneous-based access for the treatment of aRVF after LVAD implantation. In 14 patients recruited during a 62-month period, Natanov et al. [7] investigated the feasibility of a trans-jugular approach for the establishment of a veno-pulmonary MCS (in some patients with oxygenator, reproducing an OxyRVAD configuration) as support of the failing RV during or after LVAD implantation [7]. All patients received a 15-F single-lumen return cannula (Bio-Medicus, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) in the PA, implanted with the use of a guidewire previously inserted and positioned with a Swan-Ganz catheter into the PA. The draining canula was always implanted with a Seldinger technique into the femoral vein. Among the 14 patients, 12 survived and demonstrated favourable outcomes in terms of RV recovery (n = 7), implantation of a durable RVAD (n = 4) or heart transplantation (n = 1). Rather than the novelty of a specific trans-jugular percutaneous technique, already described in several publications [2-5], Natanov et al. [7] developed the concept of a minimally invasive PA approach simultaneous to LVAD implantation. The possibility to accomplish a minimally invasive RV support in such circumstances is certainly an additional step towards an enhanced LVAD patient management. The reduced impact of this technique compared to the traditional temporary RVADs allows for a prophylactic and timely support of the failing RV during and after LVAD implantation [8]. Interestingly, as 7 patients showed RV recovery, 6 of them (85.7%) underwent implantation of the temporary RVAD simultaneously to LVAD surgery. This successful synchronous approach of LVAD implantation combined with an RV support device emphasizes the need for adequate timing in the management of post-LVAD aRVF. Indeed, as identified by Harjola et al. [9] in the consensus paper from the European Society of Cardiology about general RVF management or also in the experience of Kapur et al. [10] about medically refractory RVF, the timing of RVF management is the key to success. A proper planning of the strategy for RVF prevention and treatment should consider also the appropriateness of the logistic environment. As performing a minimally invasive PA cannulation requires the presence of fluoroscopy, the use of a hybrid operating room and the presence of a multidisciplinary team may be required to offer an adequate, timely and less invasive approach to these patients. For decades, aRVF has represented a neglected and troublesome complication, with challenging management and dismal results, particularly after LVAD implantation. Nowadays, it has become a well-manageable adverse event, with several minimally invasive and percutaneous solutions to overcome it. Obviously, care must be taken since life-threatening complications may also occur while percutaneously reaching the PA, but adequate knowledge and training may turn this approach into a doable procedure in the overall RVF scenario, but particularly in LVAD patients. Further research in this setting is ongoing, and consistent information will soon be available to ultimately confirm the efficacy and most likely superiority of percutaneous approaches as compared to more traditional and invasive ones. Percutaneous access to dedicated and isolated RV dysfunction is now a reality … at last!
  10 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Acute Right Ventricular Failure.

Authors:  Navin K Kapur; Michele L Esposito; Yousef Bader; Kevin J Morine; Michael S Kiernan; Duc Thinh Pham; Daniel Burkhoff
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Novel percutaneous dual-lumen cannula-based right ventricular assist device provides effective support for refractory right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Michael Salna; A Reshad Garan; Ajay J Kirtane; Dimitrios Karmpaliotis; Phil Green; Hiroo Takayama; Joseph Sanchez; Paul Kurlansky; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Paolo C Colombo; Yoshifumi Naka; Koji Takeda
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2020-04-01

3.  A novel approach to percutaneous right-ventricular mechanical support.

Authors:  Hiroo Takayama; Yoshifumi Naka; Susheel K Kodali; Julie A Vincent; Linda J Addonizio; Ulrich P Jorde; Mathew R Williams
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Comparison of Percutaneous and Surgical Right Ventricular Assist Device Support After Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Insertion.

Authors:  Ellie J Coromilas; Koji Takeda; Masahiko Ando; Marisa Cevasco; Phillip Green; Dimitri Karmpaliotis; Ajay Kirtane; Veli K Topkara; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Hiroo Takayama; Yoshifumi Naka; Daniel Burkhoff; Paolo C Colombo; A Reshad Garan
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 5.712

5.  Effects of a percutaneous mechanical circulatory support device for medically refractory right ventricular failure.

Authors:  Navin K Kapur; Vikram Paruchuri; Ravikiran Korabathina; Ramzi Al-Mohammdi; James O Mudd; Jordan Prutkin; Michele Esposito; Ameer Shah; Michael S Kiernan; Candice Sech; Duc Thinh Pham; Marvin A Konstam; David Denofrio
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 10.247

6.  Acute lung injury after mechanical circulatory support implantation in patients on extracorporeal life support: an unrecognized problem.

Authors:  David Boulate; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Matteo Pozzi; Michaela Niculescu; Alain Combes; Pascal Leprince; Matthias Kirsch
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-03-10       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 7.  Contemporary management of acute right ventricular failure: a statement from the Heart Failure Association and the Working Group on Pulmonary Circulation and Right Ventricular Function of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Veli-Pekka Harjola; Alexandre Mebazaa; Jelena Čelutkienė; Dominique Bettex; Hector Bueno; Ovidiu Chioncel; Maria G Crespo-Leiro; Volkmar Falk; Gerasimos Filippatos; Simon Gibbs; Adelino Leite-Moreira; Johan Lassus; Josep Masip; Christian Mueller; Wilfried Mullens; Robert Naeije; Anton Vonk Nordegraaf; John Parissis; Jillian P Riley; Arsen Ristic; Giuseppe Rosano; Alain Rudiger; Frank Ruschitzka; Petar Seferovic; Benjamin Sztrymf; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Mehmet Birhan Yilmaz; Stavros Konstantinides
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 15.534

8.  Pulmonary artery cannulation to enhance extracorporeal membrane oxygenation management in acute cardiac failure.

Authors:  Roberto Lorusso; Giuseppe Maria Raffa; Samuel Heuts; Valeria Lo Coco; Paolo Meani; Ehsan Natour; Elham Bidar; Thijs Delnoij; Antonio Loforte
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2020-02-01

Review 9.  Right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Valeria Lo Coco; Maria Elena De Piero; Giulio Massimi; Giovanni Chiarini; Giuseppe M Raffa; Mariusz Kowalewski; Jos Maessen; Roberto Lorusso
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Minimal invasive temporary percutaneous right ventricular circulatory support after left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Ruslan Natanov; Marcel Ricklefs; Nodir Madrahimov; Felix Fleissner; Axel Haverich; Christian Kühn
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-10-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.